Abstract
The explosion of information technology in the last two decades has led to a substantial growth in quantity, diversity and complexity of web-accessible linguistic data. These resources become even more useful when linked with each other, and the last few years have seen the emergence of numerous approaches in various disciplines concerned with linguistic resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baader F, Horrocks I, Sattler U (2005) Description logics as ontology languages for the Semantic Web. Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning pp 228–248
Berners-Lee T (2006) Design issues: Linked data. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Bird S, Liberman M (2001) A formal framework for linguistic annotation. Speech Communication 33(1-2):23–60
Bouda P, Cysouw M (this vol.) Treating dictionaries as a Linked-Data corpus. pp 15–23
Bray T, Paoli J, Sperberg-McQueen C, Maler E, Yergeau F (1997) Extensible Markup Language (XML). World Wide Web Journal 2(4):27–66
Burchardt A, Padó S, Spohr D, Frank A, Heid U (2008) Formalising Multi-layer Corpora in OWL/DL – Lexicon Modelling, Querying and Consistency Control. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on NLP (IJCNLP 2008), Hyderabad
Cassidy S (2010) An RDF realisation of LAF in the DADA annotation server. In: Proceedings of the 5th Joint ISO-ACL/SIGSEM Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-5), Hong Kong
Chiarcos C (this vol.) Interoperability of corpora and annotations. pp 161–179
Declerck T, Lendvai P, Mörth K, Budin G, Váradi T (this vol.) Towards Linked Language Data for Digital Humanities. pp 109–116
Dipper S (2005) XML-based stand-off representation and exploitation of multi-level linguistic annotation. In: Proc. Berliner XML Tage 2005 (BXML 2005), Berlin, Germany, pp 39–50
Dostert L (1955) The Georgetown-IBM experiment. In: Locke WN, Booth AD (eds) Machine Translation of Languages, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 124–135
Francis WN, Kucera H (1964) Brown Corpus manual. Manual of information to accompany A standard corpus of present-day edited American English, for use with digital computers. Tech. rep., Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, revised edition 1979
Goldfarb CF, Rubinsky Y (eds) (1990) The SGML handbook. Oxford University Press, New York
Hellmann S (2010) The semantic gap of formalized meaning. In: The 7th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2010), Heraklion, Greece
Hellmann S, Stadler C, Lehmann J (this vol.) The German DBpedia: A sense repository for linking entities. pp 181–189
Ide N (1998) Corpus Encoding Standard: SGML guidelines for encoding linguistic corpora. In: Proceedings of the First International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 1998), pp 463–70
Ide N, Pustejovsky J (2010) What does interoperability mean, anyway? Toward an operational definition of interoperability. In: Proc. Second International Conference on Global Interoperability for Language Resources (ICGL 2010), Hong Kong, China
Ide N, Suderman K (2007) GrAF: A graph-based format for linguistic annotations. In: Proc. Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW 2007), Prague, Czech Republic, pp 1–8
Lassila O, Swick RR (1999) Resource Description Framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium
McGuinness D, Van Harmelen F (2004) OWL Web Ontology Language overview. w3c recommendation. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium
Miles A, Bechhofer S (2009) SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System reference. W3C Recommendation. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium
Morris W (ed) (1969) The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Houghton Mifflin, New York
Nordhoff S (this vol.) Linked Data for linguistic diversity research: Glottolog/Langdoc and ASJP. pp 191–200
Schalley AC (this vol.) TYTO – A collaborative research tool for linked linguistic data. pp 139–149
Text Encoding Initiative (1990) TEI P1 guidelines for the encoding and interchange of machine readable texts. Tech. rep., Text Encoding Initiative, draft Version 1.1 1
Thompson S (1955-58) Motif-index of folk-literature: A classification of narrative elements in folktales, ballads, myths, fables, medieval romances, exempla, fabliaux, jest-books, and local legends. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
W3C OWL Working Group (2009) OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. document overview. W3C Recommendation. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium
Wilcock G (2007) An OWL ontology for HPSG. In: Proc. 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic, pp 169–172
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chiarcos, C., Hellmann, S., Nordhoff, S. (2012). Introduction and Overview. In: Chiarcos, C., Nordhoff, S., Hellmann, S. (eds) Linked Data in Linguistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28249-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28249-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28248-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28249-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)