Abstract
Open Source Software (OSS) communities do not often invest in marketing strategies to promote their products in a competitive way. Even the home pages of the web portals of well-known OSS products show technicalities and details that are not relevant for a fast and effective evaluation of the product’s qualities. So, final users and even developers who are interested in evaluating and potentially adopting an OSS product are often negatively impressed by the quality perception they have from the web portal of the product and turn to proprietary software solutions or fail to adopt OSS that may be useful in their activities. In this paper, we define OP2A, an evaluation model and we derive a checklist that OSS developers and web masters can use to design (or improve) their web portals with all the contents that are expected to be of interest for OSS final users. We exemplify the use of the model by applying it to the Apache Tomcat web portal and we apply the model to 47 web sites of well-known OSS products to highlight the current deficiencies that characterize these web portals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Apache Tomcat Web Site, http://tomcat.apache.org/ (last visited: January 2011)
Arnesen, L.P., Dimiti, J.M., Ingvoldstad, J., Nergaard, A., Sitaula, N.K.: SourceForge Analysis, Evaluation and Improvements. Technical Report, University of Oslo (May 2000)
Atos Origin, Method for Qualification and Selection of Open Source Software (QSOS). Web published, http://www.qsos.org (last visited: January 2011)
Del Bianco, V., Chinosi, M., Lavazza, L., Morasca, S., Taibi, D.: How European software industry perceives OSS trustworthiness and what are the specific criteria to establish trust in OSS. Deliverable A5.D.1.5.1 – QualiPSo project – (October 2008), Web published, http://www.qualipso.eu/node/45 (last visited: January 2011)
Del Bianco, V., Lavazza, L., Morasca, S., Taibi, D.: A Survey on Open Source Software Trustworthiness. IEEE Software (to appear)
FSF Free Software Foundation Web Page, http://www.fsf.org (last visited: January 2011)
Golden, B.: Making Open Source Ready for the Enterprise: The Open Source Maturity Model, from “Succeeding with Open Source”. Addison-Wesley (2005)
International Standardization Organization. “ISO 9001:2008”. Web published, http://www.iso.org (last visited: January 2011)
Jacob, R.J.: The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: what you look at is what you get. ACM Transaction on Inf. Syst. 9(2), 152–169 (1991)
Del Bianco, V., Lavazza, I., Morasca, I., Taibi, D., Tosi, D.: An Investigation of the users’ perception of OSS quality. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Open Source Systems (OSS), Notre Dame, IN, USA (May/June 2010)
Lavazza, L., Morasca, S., Taibi, D., Tosi, D.: Analysis of relevant open source projects. Deliverable A5.D.1.5.2 – QualiPSo project – (October 2008), Web published, http://www.qualipso.eu/node/84 (last visited: January 2011)
Minelle, F., Stolfi, F., Raiss, G.: A proposal for a certification scheme for the Italian Public Administration web sites quality. In: W3C – Euroweb Conference, Italy (2001)
Nielsen, J.: User Interface Directions for the Web. Communications of the ACM 42(1), 65–72 (1999)
Nielsen, J., Norman, D.: Usability On The Web Isn’t A Luxury. Information Week (February 2000)
Nielsen, J., Landauer, T.K.: A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of ACM INTERCHI 1993 Conference, pp. 206–213 (1993)
O’Reilly CodeZoo SpikeSource community initiative, being sponsored by Carnegie Mellon West Center for Open Source Investigation and Intel. Business Readiness Rating for Open Source – A Proposed Open Standard to Facilitate Assessment and Adoption of Open Source Software (August 2005)
OP2A, http://www.op2a.org (last visited: January 2011)
Pike, C., Gao, D., Udell, R.: Web Page Usability Analysis. Technical Report, Pennsylvania State University (December 2003)
QualiPSo Web page, http://www.qualipso.org (last visited: January 2011)
Sourceforge Web page, http://www.sourceforge.net (last visited: January 2011)
Taibi, D., Lavazza, L., Morasca, S.: OpenBQR: a framework for the assessment of OSS. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Open Source Systems (OSS), Limerick, Ireland, pp. 173–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
W3C recommendation, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, 2008. Web published, http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ (last visited: September 2010)
Wasserman, A., Pal, M., Chan, C.: Business Readiness Rating Project. Whitepaper 2005, RFC 1, http://www.openbrr.org/wiki/images/d/da/BRR_whitepaper_2005RFC1.pdf (last visited: January 2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lavazza, L., Morasca, S., Taibi, D., Tosi, D. (2012). OP2A: How to Improve the Quality of the Web Portal of Open Source Software Products. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Web Information Systems and Technologies. WEBIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 101. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28082-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28082-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28081-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28082-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)