Skip to main content

Comparing Structure-Oriented and Behavior-Oriented Variability Modeling for Workflows

  • Conference paper
Eternal Systems (EternalS 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 255))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Workflows exist in many different variants in order to adapt the behavior of systems to different circumstances and to arising user’s needs. Variability modeling is a way of keeping track at the model level of the currently supported and used workflow variants. Variability modeling approaches for workflows address two directions: structure-oriented approaches explicitly specify the workflow variants by means of linguistic constructs, while behavior-oriented approaches define the set of all valid compositions of workflow components by means of ontological annotations and temporal logic constraints. In this paper, we describe how both structure-oriented and behavior-oriented variability modeling can be captured in an eXtreme Model-Driven Design paradigm (XMDD). We illustrate this via a concrete case (a variant-rich bioinformatics workflow realized with the jABC platform for XMDD), and we compare the two approaches in order to identify their profiles and synergies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods and Systems. MIT Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering - Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Czarnecki, K., Eisenecker, U.W.: Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, K., Lee, J., Donohoe, P.: Feature-Oriented Project Line Engineering. IEEE Software 19(4) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Margaria, T., Steffen, B.: Agile IT: Thinking in User-Centric Models. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. CCIS, vol. 17, pp. 490–502. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Margaria, T., Steffen, B.: Business Process Modelling in the jABC: The One-Thing-Approach. In: Handbook of Research on Business Process Modeling. IGI Global (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steffen, B., Margaria, T., Nagel, R., Jörges, S., Kubczak, C.: Model-Driven Development with the jABC. In: Bin, E., Ziv, A., Ur, S. (eds.) HVC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4383, pp. 92–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamprecht, A.L., Naujokat, S., Margaria, T., Steffen, B.: Synthesis-Based Loose Programming. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, QUATIC (September 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lamprecht, A.-L., Margaria, T., Steffen, B.: Seven Variations of an Alignment Workflow - An Illustration of Agile Process Design and Management in Bio-jETI. In: Măndoiu, I., Wang, S.-L., Zelikovsky, A. (eds.) ISBRA 2008. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 4983, pp. 445–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwon, Y., Shigemoto, Y., Kuwana, Y., Sugawara, H.: Web API for biology with a workflow navigation system. Nucl. Acids Res. 37(suppl_2), W11–W16 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Larkin, M., Blackshields, G., Brown, N., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J., Gibson, T., Higgins, D.: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23(21), 2947–2948 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Ommering, R.C.: Software reuse in product populations. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 31(7), 537–550 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakera, M., Margaria, T., Renner, C., Steffen, B.: Tool-supported enhancement of diagnosis in model-driven verification. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering 5, 211–228 (2009), doi:10.1007/s11334-009-0091-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Naujokat, S.: Automatische Generierung von Prozessen im jABC. Diplomarbeit, TU Dortmund (September 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steffen, B., Margaria, T., Freitag, B.: Module Configuration by Minimal Model Construction. Technical report, Fakultät für Mathematik und Informatik, Universität Passau (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milner, R.: Communication and concurrency. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. The MIT Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Müller-Olm, M., Schmidt, D., Steffen, B.: Model-Checking - A Tutorial Introduction. Static Analysis, 848 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Manna, Z., Wolper, P.: Synthesis of Communicating Processes from Temporal Logic Specifications. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 6(1), 68–93 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Steffen, B., Margaria, T., von der Beeck, M.: Automatic synthesis of linear process models from temporal constraints: An incremental approach. In: ACM/SIGPLAN Int. Workshop on Automated Analysis of Software, AAS 1997 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Braun, V., Margaria, T., Steffen, B., Yoo, H., Rychly, T.: Safe service customization. In: Intelligent Network Workshop, IN 1997, vol. 2, p. 4. IEEE (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lamprecht, A.L., Margaria, T., Steffen, B.: Bio-jETI: a framework for semantics-based service composition. BMC Bioinformatics 10(suppl.10), S8 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lamprecht, A.L., Naujokat, S., Margaria, T., Steffen, B.: Semantics-based composition of EMBOSS services. Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2(suppl. 1), S5 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lamprecht, A.L., Naujokat, S., Steffen, B., Margaria, T.: Constraint-Guided Workflow Composition Based on the EDAM Ontology. In: Burger, A., Marshall, M.S., Romano, P., Paschke, A., Splendiani, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for Life Sciences, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Berlin, Germany, December 10, vol. 698 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmid, K., Rabiser, R., Grünbacher, P.: A comparison of decision modeling approaches in product lines. In: VaMoS, pp. 119–126 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Völter, M., Groher, I.: Product Line Implementation using Aspect-Oriented and Model-Driven Software Development. In: SPLC, pp. 233–242 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ziadi, T., Hélouët, L., Jézéquel, J.M.: Towards a UML Profile for Software Product Lines. In: Workshop on Product Familiy Engineering (PFE), pp. 129–139 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gomaa, H.: Designing Software Product Lines with UML. Addison Wesley (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Busch, C.: Overview of Generative Software Development. In: Banâtre, J.-P., Fradet, P., Giavitto, J.-L., Michel, O. (eds.) UPP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3566, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Batory, D., Sarvela, J., Rauschmayer, A.: Scaling Step-Wise Refinement. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 30(6), 355–371 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Heidenreich, F., Wende, C.: Bridging the Gap Between Features and Models. In: Aspect-Oriented Product Line Engineering, AOPLE 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Noda, N., Kishi, T.: Aspect-Oriented Modeling for Variability Management. In: SPLC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Apel, S., Janda, F., Trujillo, S., Kästner, C.: Model Superimposition in Software Product Lines. In: Paige, R.F. (ed.) ICMT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5563, pp. 4–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Haugen, Ø., Møller-Pedersen, B., Oldevik, J., Olsen, G., Svendsen, A.: Adding Standardized Variability to Domain Specific Languages. In: SPLC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Clarke, D., Helvensteijn, M., Schaefer, I.: Abstract delta modeling. In: GPCE. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pérez, J., Díaz, J., Soria, C.C., Garbajosa, J.: Plastic Partial Components: A solution to support variability in architectural components. In: WICSA/ECSA, pp. 221–230 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schaefer, I., Lamprecht, A.L., Margaria, T.: Constraint-oriented Variability Modelin. In: Rash, J., Rouff, C. (eds.) 34th Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW-34). IEEE CS Press (to appear, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lamprecht, AL., Margaria, T., Schaefer, I., Steffen, B. (2012). Comparing Structure-Oriented and Behavior-Oriented Variability Modeling for Workflows. In: Moschitti, A., Scandariato, R. (eds) Eternal Systems. EternalS 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 255. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28033-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28033-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28032-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28033-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics