Skip to main content

The Virtual and Physical Reconstruction of the Octagon and Hadrian’s Temple in Ephesus

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Scientific Computing and Cultural Heritage

Abstract

The so-called Octagon and the Hadrian’s Temple are two prominent buildings in the city center of Roman Ephesus. The Octagon, a monumental tomb monument from the first century B.C., is possibly the grave of the Ptolemaic princess Arsinoe IV, sister of the famous Cleopatra VII. Research on this building was started in 2005. The Hadrian’s Temple was re-erected shortly after its excavation in the 1959s and is therefore one of the prominent landmarks of the site. A new project on its investigation was started in 2009. Both structures have been documented by means of 3D surface scanning. This article presents the first results of both projects. It focuses on the goals, the challenges and the potential that this method offers to archaeologists and architectural historians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A project on the Hadrian’s temple is currently conducted at the Austrian Archaeological Institute (ÖAI), funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF Project P20947-G02). The Octagon-Project is conducted at the ÖAI, funded by the “Gesellschaft der Freunde von Ephesos”.

  2. 2.

    Exemplary architectural documentation has been published by members of the German school for “Archäologische Bauforschung” during the last 100 years, cf. e.g. [7], [8].

  3. 3.

    The dating of the monument is controversial. Traditionally, it is dated to the late Hellenistic or Augustan period based on the architectural decoration. Most recently see [11] with further references. The evaluation of pottery fragments that were found in a sondage behind the Octagon in 1993 seem to confirm the former dating of the end of the 1st century B. C.; see [12].

  4. 4.

    The marble was analysed by W. Prochaska, see [16].

  5. 5.

    Anastylosis by the means of the Venice Charta is the physical reconstruction of a building by using only the original building components.

  6. 6.

    About a former use of a time-of-flight laser scanner in Ephesus see: [21].

References

  1. Ladstätter S (2009) Neue Forschungen zur Kuretenstraße von Ephesos. Akten des Symposiums für Hilke Thür vom 13. Dezember 2006 an der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Archäolog Forsch 15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mueller P, Vereenooghe T, Vergauwen M, Van Gool L, Waelkens M (2006) Photo-realistic and detailed 3D modeling: The Antonine Nymphaeum at Sagalassos (Turkey). http://www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/~pmueller/documents/caa04_pmueller.pdf. Retrieved 7 Apr 2006

  3. Wörrle M (1973) Zur Datierung des Hadrianstempels an der‚ Kuretenstraße’ in Ephesos. Archäolog Anz:470–477

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hueber F (1995) Ephesos. Gebaute Geschichte. Zabern, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  5. Outschar U (1999) Zur Deutung des Hadrianstempels an der Kuretenstraße. In: Friesinger H, Krinzinger F (ed) 100 Jahre österreichische Forschungen in Ephesos. Akten des Symposions Wien 1995. Archäolog Forsch 1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miltner F (1959) XXII. Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Ephesos. Jahresh d Österr Archäol Inst 44 Beibl: 264–273

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knackfuss H (1941) Didyma 1. Die Baubeschreibung. Gebr. Mann, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koldewey R, Puchstein O (1899) Die griechischen Tempel in Unteritalien und Sizilien. A. Asher, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thuswaldner B (2009) Zur computergestützten steingerechten Rekonstruktion des Oktogons in Ephesos. In Ladstätter (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thuswaldner B, Kalasek R (2008) The virtual anastylosis of the octagon in Ephesus. In: Al-Qawasmi J et al (ed) Digit media and its appl in cultural heritage 4, CSAAR Publications

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plattner GA (2009) Zur Bauornamentik des Oktogons in Ephesos. In Ladstätter (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waldner A (2009) Heroon und Oktogon. In Ladstätter (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heberdey R (1905) Vorläufiger Bericht über die Grabungen in Ephesos 1904. Jahresh d Österr Archäol Inst 8 Beibl:70–76

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keil J (1930) XV. Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Ephesos. Jahresh d Österr Archäol Inst 26 Beibl:41–43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thür H (1990) Arsinoe IV, eine Schwester Kleopatras VII, Grabinhaberin des Oktogons in Ephesos? Ein Vorschlag. Jahresh d Österr Archäol Inst 60:43–56

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prochaska W (2009) Petrografische Untersuchungen zu den Marmoren des “Octogons” in Ephesos. Unpublished report

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grossmann GU (1993) Einführung in die historische Bauforschung. WBG, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gruben G (2000) Klassische Bauforschung. In: Borbein AH et al (eds) Klassische Archäologie. Reimer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miltner F (1959) Denkmalpflege in Ephesos. Österr Z f Kunst und Denkmalpfl 13:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  20. Niemeier W et al (2002) 3-D-Geometrieerfassung mit terrestrischen Laserscannern. In: Luhmann T (ed) Photogrammetrie und Laserscanning. Wichmann, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  21. Groh S, Neubauer W (2003) Einsatz eines terrestrischen 3D-Laserscanners in Ephesos. Jahresh d Österr Archäol Inst 72:111–122

    Google Scholar 

  22. Havemeister R, Seifert JP (2003). Master thesis: Untersuchung des Vermessungsverfahrens mit einem Lichtschnittscanner im Vergleich zur Nahbereichsphotogrammetrie

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the head of the Ephesos excavation, S. Ladstätter, for supporting the projects. The director of the Efes Müzesi Selçuk, C. Topal, enabled the scanning of the original frieze blocks in the museum. M. Büyükkolancı made the scanning of fragments possible that are now stored at the Basilica of St. John in Selçuk. F. Öztürk was an invaluable help for organisation, as well as the workmen Yusuf Turan and Mustafa Cobanoğlu and the foreman İbrahim Kınacı. Ch. Kurtze provided the necessary surveying data. We would also like to acknowledge UT Vienna/Department of Spatial Development, Infrastructure and Environmental Planning for infrastructure and IT support as well as UT Vienna/Institute of History of Art, Building Archaeology and Restoration (Prof. M. Doering-Williams) for collaboration and Hilke Thuer for valuable discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursula Quatember .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Quatember, U., Thuswaldner, B., Kalasek, R., Breuckmann, B., Bathow, C. (2013). The Virtual and Physical Reconstruction of the Octagon and Hadrian’s Temple in Ephesus. In: Bock, H., Jäger, W., Winckler, M. (eds) Scientific Computing and Cultural Heritage. Contributions in Mathematical and Computational Sciences, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28021-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics