Abstract
The methodological use of contradiction may be extrapolated and applied to the study of a large number of phenomena, institutions, and even concepts, particularly those that follow a historical line. In principle, therefore, there is nothing particularly unusual about employing this method with federalism. However, what is specific to this case is that the various aspects of the historical study and development of federalism herein dealt with—the theoretical/political, constitutional, and socio-economic or territorial perspective—occur contradictorily and also with an added peculiarity: the elements of the contradiction that occur in the different areas addressed end up proving consistent and uncontradictory, ultimately offering a plausible explanation for what appears to be a sustained crisis of federalism. Thus, the contradiction disappears even though contradiction has contributed to explaining its content.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Cabo Martín, C. (2013). Contradiction and Crisis in the Federal Idea. In: López Basaguren, A., Escajedo San Epifanio, L. (eds) The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27720-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27720-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27719-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27720-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)