Skip to main content

Intergovernmental Relations in Spain and the Constitutional Court Ruling on the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia: What’s Next?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The Spanish Constitution (SC) of 1978 represents the advent of democracy in Spain after a long dictatorship and also the construction of a politically decentralised state, the so-called State of Autonomies, formed by the central government, 17 autonomous communities (ACs), and 2 autonomous cities. The territorial decentralisation process in Spain has dismantled a traditionally centralist state, has occurred in parallel with the consolidation of democracy, and moreover has coincided with the integration of Spain in 1986 in the European Union.

This work is part of the research project of the R+D+I National Plan funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation: “Statutory Reforms and New Instruments of Relationship between the State and the Autonomous Communities” (DER 2008-04108/JURI).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this text, the terms ‘intergovernmental relations’ and ‘cooperation relations’ are used interchangeably. It should be noted that, in the State of Autonomies, the expression ‘intergovernmental relations’ is used in academic circles. In laws, in institutional documents, and between the practitioners themselves, reference is made to ‘cooperation relations’.

  2. 2.

    Cruz Villalón (1990), pp. 119–134.

  3. 3.

    STC 76/1982, FJ 13.

  4. 4.

    Central government law (ley del poder central o ley estatal) in this paper is used to refer to any law governing the country of Spain as a whole.

  5. 5.

    Ley 12/1983 (Art. 4).

  6. 6.

    Ley 30/1992 (arts. 4–10). Alberti Rovira (1993), pp. 41–70.

  7. 7.

    Specifically, on dependence, Sáez Royo (2010), pp. 361–386.

  8. 8.

    Valencian Community (2006), Catalonia (2006), Balearic Islands (2007), Andalusia (2007), Aragon (2007), Castilla y León (2007), Navarra (2010), Extremadura (2011). The new Statutes are available on the web page of the Ministry of Territorial Policy: http://www.mpt.gob.es/es/areas/politica_autonomica/Estatutos_Autonomia.html.

  9. 9.

    García Morales (2009a).

  10. 10.

    The Statute of Andalusia is the most similar. The Statute of Catalonia was contested in the High Court by 50 MPs from the Popular Party parliamentary group in the Spanish Parliament, the Defensor del Pueblo (the Spanish Ombudsman), and the government of the Autonomous Community of La Rioja.

  11. 11.

    Aja (2003), pp. 169–199. Viver Pi-Sunyer (2010), pp. 213–234.

  12. 12.

    The creation of the Conference of Presidents became one of the items on the regional agenda of the president of the government, Mr Rodríguez Zapatero. Further details, Tajadura Tejada (2010), pp. 134–172.

  13. 13.

    STC 76/1983, FJ 13.

  14. 14.

    In Spain, vertical agreements are usually referred to as agreements (convenios) if they are legally binding and simply as accords (acuerdos) if they are political commitments that are not legally binding. To underline this difference, in this text I have used accord as a translation for acuerdo (agreements that are not legally binding) and agreement as a translation for convenio (agreements that are legally binding).

  15. 15.

    Multilateralism appears in the Statute of Catalonia as a principle (Art. 3), a means of cooperation with the central government (Art. 175), and a means of participation in European affairs (Art. 186) and in funding issues (Art. 210).

  16. 16.

    Art. 176 of the Statute of Catalonia.

  17. 17.

    STC 31/2010, FJ 112.

  18. 18.

    García Morales and Arbós Marín (2012). Institutional information about existing conferences, available on the web page of the Ministry of Territorial Policy (Autonomous Policy): http://www.mpt.gob.es/es/areas/politica_autonomica/coop_multilateral_ccaa_ue/cooperacion_multilateral/Conf_Sectoriales.html.

  19. 19.

    Pérez Medina (2009), p. 350. The existence of diverse interests hinders cooperation even in countries that are a model of cooperative federalism, Jeffery (1999), pp. 50–63.

  20. 20.

    The Bilateral Commissions were established in this order: with Navarra (1983); with Catalonia, the Basque Country, and Galicia (1987); with Murcia and La Rioja (1988); with the Balearic Islands (1989); with the Canary Islands and Aragon (1990); with Cantabria (1991); with Castilla y León and Extremadura (1992); with Asturias (1993); with Castilla-La Mancha (1996); and with the Valencian Community and the Community of Madrid (2000). The Bilateral Commissions with the Autonomous Cities of Ceuta and Melilla (1995).

  21. 21.

    According to the Organic Law on the Constitutional Court (Art. 33.2), if the parties choose to resolve a dispute through negotiation, the deadline for lodging an appeal in the Constitutional Court is extended by 6 months with regard to the three initially provided. In terms of efficiency, results vary between Bilateral Commissions. In general, it may be said that these instruments have helped to reduce the number of disputes in the Constitutional Court.

  22. 22.

    The statutes of the Valencian Community and the Balearic Islands are the only ones that do not provide for a Bilateral Commission. The Statute of Andalusia follows the Catalan regulation in almost identical terms. Ridaura Martínez (2010), pp. 256–274.

  23. 23.

    The Bilateral Commission may deliberate, make proposals, and pass resolutions with regard to the following areas: draft laws, economic policy agendas, promotion of measures to improve cooperation, assessment of such measures, power disputes and subsequent resolution, monitoring of European policy, monitoring of overseas activity, and any issue of common interest (Art. 183).

  24. 24.

    STC 31/2010, FFJJ 115, 116. Along with the general Bilateral Commission, the Statute of Catalonia provides for two specific Bilateral Commissions: the Joint Economic and Fiscal Affairs Commission (Art. 210) and a Bilateral Commission on Investments in Infrastructures (third additional provision). The Constitutional Court has also upheld their constitutionality.

  25. 25.

    The Bilateral Commission with Catalonia: eight meetings; the Bilateral Commission with Andalusia: seven meetings; the Commission with Aragon: three meetings; the Commission with Castilla y León (two meetings) (source: prepared by the author).

  26. 26.

    García Morales (2009b), pp. 383–394. Institutional Information about the Bilateral Commissions: http://www.mpt.gob.es/es/areas/politica_autonomica/coop_bilateral_CCAA/comisiones_bilaterales.html.

  27. 27.

    In particular, the Statute of Andalusia and partially the Statute of Aragon.

  28. 28.

    STC 31/2010, FJ 111.

  29. 29.

    Corretja et al. (2011), pp. 403–446; Montilla Martos (2011), pp.184–195.

  30. 30.

    The official number of agreements between ACs is calculated on the basis of agreements communicated to the Spanish Parliament, which may be viewed on the Senate web page: http://www.senado.es. See also, García Morales (annual).

  31. 31.

    García Morales (2009b), pp. 116.

  32. 32.

    Rubio Llorente and Álvarez Junco (2006), pp. 163–165.

  33. 33.

    Only one cooperation agreement has been signed: the so-called Mediterranean Arc Agreement signed in 1994 by Andalusia, Murcia, the Balearic Islands, and the Valencian Community.

  34. 34.

    Art. 115 Catalan Statute. The equivalent in the Statute of Andalusia: Art. 43.

  35. 35.

    STC 329/1993, FJ 3; STC 194/2004, FJ 8.

  36. 36.

    The Valencian Community, Catalonia, the Balearic Islands, Andalusia, Aragon, and Castilla y León.

  37. 37.

    The ACs have created a website to make the work of these Meetings more visible: http://www.comunidadesautonomas.org.

  38. 38.

    De Pedro Bonet (2011), pp. 94–113.

  39. 39.

    Central government Law 4/1997, of 13 March, creating the Conference for European Union Affairs.

  40. 40.

    On direct participation, one may consult the web page of the Ministry of Territorial Policy (ACs and European Union): http://www.mpt.gob.es/es/areas/politica_autonomica/coop_multilateral_ccaa_ue/ccaa_y_ue.html.

  41. 41.

    Art. 186 and additional provision 2 of the Statute of Catalonia. In almost identical terms, the Statute of Andalusia (Art. 231).

  42. 42.

    Pérez Medina (2009), pp. 353–354. Börzel (2000), pp. 17–42.

  43. 43.

    STC 31/2010, FJ 210.

  44. 44.

    Roig Molés (1999), pp. 203–207. Cordal Rodríguez (2010), pp. 293–301.

  45. 45.

    Art. 189 of the Statute of Catalonia.

  46. 46.

    García Morales (2011), pp. 42–45.

  47. 47.

    Benz (2007), pp. 421–436.

References

  • Aja, E. (2003), El Estado autonómico. Federalismo y hechos diferenciales. Alianza, Madrid, pp. 169–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti Rovira, E. (1993). Relaciones entre Administraciones Pública. In: Leguina Villa, J., Sánchez Morón, M. (dirs.). Comentarios a la Ley 30/1992, de 26 de noviembre, de Régimen Jurídico de las Administraciones Públicas y del Procedimiento Administrativo Común. Tecnos. Madrid, pp. 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2007). Inter-Regional Competition in Co-operative Federalism: New Modes of Multi-level Governance in Germany. Regional & Federal Studies, No. 4, pp. 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T.A. (2000). From Competitive Regionalism to Cooperative Federalism: The Europeanization of the Spanish State of the Autonomies. Publius 30:2, pp. 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordal Rodríguez, C. (2010). Regiones, Länder y Comunidades Autónomas en la Unión Europea. Torculo Ed. Santiago, pp. 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corretja, M., Vintró J., Bernadí, X. (2011). Bilateralitat i multilateralitat. La participació de la Generalitat en polítiques i organismes estatals i la Comissió Bilateral. Revista d’ Estudis Autonòmics i Federals, No. 12, pp. 403–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz Villalón, P. (1990). La doctrina constitucional sobre el principio de cooperación. In: Cano Bueso, J. (ed.,). Comunidades Autónomas e instrumentos de cooperación interterritorial. Parlamento de Andalucía. Madrid. Tecnos, 1990, pp. 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pedro Bonet, X. (2011). La Conferencia de Gobiernos de las Comunidades Autónomas. In: Tornos Mas, J. (dir.), Informe Comunidades Autónomas 2011. Instituto de Derecho Público. Barcelona, pp. 94–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Morales, M.J. (2009a), Los nuevos Estatutos de Autonomía y las relaciones de colaboración. Un nuevo escenario, ¿una nueva etapa? Revista Jurídica de Castilla y León, No. 19 [número monográfico], pp. 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Morales, M.J. (2009b). La colaboración a examen. Retos y riesgos de las relaciones intergubernamentales en el Estado autonómico. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, No. 86, pp. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Morales, M.J. (2011). La prevención del incumplimiento del Derecho europeo en el Estado autonómico: instrumentos, posibilidades y límites. In: Biglino Campos, P., Delgado del Rincón, L. (dirs.). El incumplimiento del Derecho comunitario en el Estado autonómico. Prevención y responsabilidad. CEPC. Madrid, pp. 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Morales, M.J. (since 2001, annual). Convenios de colaboración entre el Estado y las Comunidades Autónomas y entre Comunidades Autónomas. In: Tornos Mas, J. (dir.), Informe Comunidades Autónomas. Instituto de Derecho Público. Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Morales, M.J., Arbós Marín, X. (2013). “Intergovernmental Relations in Spain”. In: Saunders, Ch., Poirier, J. (eds.), Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems. A Global Dialogue on Federalism, vol. 8, McGill/Queen’s University Press, Montréal/Kingston (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • García Morales, M.J. (coord.) (2009). Las relaciones de colaboración en los nuevos Estatutos de autonomía. Revista Jurídica de Castilla y León, No. 19 [número monográfico].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, Ch. Vom kooperativen Föderalimus zu einer Sinatra-Doktrin der Länder. In: Meiner-Walser, R.C., Hirscher, G. (Hg.). Krise un Reform des Föderalismus. Olzog, München, 1999, pp. 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montilla Martos, J. A. (2011). Las relaciones de colaboración en el nuevo marco estatutario: bilateralidad y participación. Revista de Estudios Políticos, No. 151, pp.184–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Medina, J.M. (2009). Las relaciones de colaboración entre el Estado y las Comunidades Autónomas desde la perspectiva de la Administración General del Estado. Revista Jurídica de Castilla y León, No. 19 [número monográfico], p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Medina, J.M. (2009). Las relaciones de colaboración entre el Estado y las Comunidades Autónomas desde la perspectiva de la Administración General del Estado. Revista Jurídica de Castilla y León, No. 19 [número monográfico], pp. 353–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridaura Martínez, M. J. (2010). Comisiones Bilaterales de Cooperación y nuevos Estatutos de Autonomía. In: García Roca, J., Albertí Rovira, E. (coords.). Treinta años de Constitución. Tirant lo Blanch. Valencia, pp. 256–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roig Molés, E. (1999). Asimetría y participación autonómica en la formación de la voluntad española en asuntos de la UE: ¿participación a dos velocidades? Revista Vasca de Administración Pública. No 55, pp. 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio Llorente, F., Álvarez Junco, J. (eds.) (2006). Informe del Consejo de Estado sobre la reforma constitucional. Texto del informe y debates académicos. CEPC, Consejo de Estado. Madrid, pp. 163–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sáez Royo, E. (2010). “Las relaciones intergubernamentales en España: Las relaciones de cooperación intergubernamental en la Ley de Dependencia: un paso sustantivo”. In: Tudela Aranda, J., Knüpling, F. (eds.). España y modelos de federalismo. CEPC. Madrid, pp. 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajadura Tejada, J. (2010). El principio de cooperación en el Estado autonómico. Comares. Granada, pp. 134–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viver Pi-Sunyer, C. (2010). El reconeixement de la plurinacionalitat de l’Estat en l’ordenament jurídic espanyol. In: Requejo, F., Gagnon, A.-G. (eds.), Nacions a la recerca de reconeixement. Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics, Barcelona, pp. 213–234 [In French in: Requejo, F., Gagnon, A.-G. (2011). Nations en quête de reconnaissance. Peter Lang, Brussels].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Jesús García Morales .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morales, M.J.G. (2013). Intergovernmental Relations in Spain and the Constitutional Court Ruling on the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia: What’s Next?. In: López - Basaguren, A., Escajedo San Epifanio, L. (eds) The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27717-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics