Skip to main content

Institutionalization of Intergovernmental Relations in a Federal State: Bilateral Treaties Under “New Centralism” in Russia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain

Abstract

This article examines institutional dynamics of Russian federalism with the focus on the analysis of intergovernmental interaction practices. It argues that although the Russian federal system passed through serious centralized reforms in the last decade, the general mode of relations between the Center and regions has not changed drastically if it is to compare with the 1990s. Certain elements of the bilateral negotiation system still continue to function in the form of a backdoor “individual” dialogue between the federal and regional elites. Taking into account that the Center is striving to implement new “technological” principles in regional governance, it appears that one of the basic contradictions of Russian federalism lies in reproducing the two different types of intergovernmental interaction practices within one institutional frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anonymous (1994). Nezavisimaia gazeta. March 17, 1994. Cit. ex: Gaida, A.V., Rudenko, V.N. (eds.) (1998). Federalism i decentralizacia. UrO RAN, Ekaterinburg, Russia, 1998, p.260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2000). Respublika Tatarstan. March 23, 2000. Cit ex: Moukhariamov, N.M. and Moukhariamova, L.M. (2004). Tatarstan v usloviyah recentralizacii po-putinski. In: Macuzato, K. (ed.) Fenomen Vladimira Putina i rossiiskie regiony: pobeda neozhidannaia ili zakonomernaia? Moskva, Russia, p. 323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2011). Rosselkhozbank i Respublika Tatarstan podpisali Soglashenie o vzaimodeistvii v ramkah Gosprogrammy razvitia selskogo hoziaistva. Available at: http://president.tatarstan.ru/news/view/99253

  • Budget Monitoring Center (2011). Open Budget. Regions of Russia. Budget and inter-budgetary relations. Available at: http://openbudget.karelia.ru/en/index.php

  • Chirikova, A.E. (2010). Regionalnye elity Rossii. Aspekt Press, Moskva, Russia, p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaida, A.V., Rudenko, V.N. (eds.) (1998). Federalism i decentralizacia. UrO RAN, Ekaterinburg, Russia, 1998, p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, V. (2009) The return of the Leviathan? The policy of recentralization in contemporary Russia. In: Ross, C. and Campbell, A. (eds.) Federalism and local politics in Russia. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E.L. (2004). Federalism and democracy: theoretical connections and cautionary insights. In: Gibson, E.L. (ed.) Federalism and democracy in Latin America. Baltimore and London, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann-Grueder, A.(2002). Is Russia’s federalism sustainable? Perspectives on European Politics and Society 3 (1): 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. (2002). Federalism, democratization, and the rule of law in Russia. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 150.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, D.R. (2001). Russian federalism: continuing myth or political salvation? Democratizatsiya 9(2): 201–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khakimov, R. (2001). On the bases of asymmetry of Russian Federation. In: Khakimov R. (ed.) Federalism in Russia. Institute of History, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Kazan Institute of Federalism, Kazan, Russia, pp. 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koniyhova, I.A. (2004). Sovremennyi rossiiskii federalism i mirovoi opyt: Itogi stanovlenia i perspektivy razvitia. Publishing House “Gorodec”, Moskva, Russia, 592 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznecova, O.V. (2009). Regionalnye aspekty deiatelnosti federalnyh institutov razvitia. Problemnyi Analiz i Gosudarstvenno-upravlencheskoe Proektirovanie 2(4): 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moukhariamov, N.M. (1997). The Tatarstan Model: a situational dynamics. In: Stavrakis, B.J., DeBardeleben, J., Black, L.(eds.) Beyond the monolith. The emergence of regionalism in Post-Soviet Russia. Washington, Baltimore, London, pp.213-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal E. (2003). Defining Russian federalism. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, London, 203 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrov, N. (2007). Korporativizm vs regionalizm. Moskovskii Centr Karnegi, Moskva, Russia. Pro et Contra 11(4–5): 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. (1964). Federalism: origin, operation, significance. Little, Brown & Company, Boston, 169 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. (2002). Federalism and democratisation in Russia. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 193 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidorenko, A. (2010). Politicheskaya vlast v etnicheskih regionah. In: Busygina, I. and Hainemann-Gruder, A. (eds.) Federalism i etnicheskoe raznoobrazie v Rossii. Rossiiskaya Politicheskaya Enciklopedia, Moskva, Russia, p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnick, S.L. (2000). Is the center too weak or too strong in the Russian Federation? In: Sperling, V. (ed.) Building the Russian state: institutional crisis and the quest for democratic governance. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner-Weiss, K. (2004). Russia: managing territorial cleavages under dual transitions. In: Amoretti, U.M. and Bermeo, N. (eds.) Federalism and territorial cleavages. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 2004, p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner-Weiss, K. (2006). Resisting the state: reform and retrenchment in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 182 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turovskii, R.F. (2010). How Russian governors are appointed: inertia and radicalism in central policy. Russian Politics and Law 48(1): 58–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volden, C. (2004). Origin, operation, and significance: the federalism of William H. Riker. Publius : Journal of Federalism 34(4): 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubarevich, N. (2010). Socio-ekonomicheskie razlichia mezhdu etnicheskimi regionami i politika pereraspredelenia. In: Busygina, I. and Hainemann-Gruder, A. (eds.) Federalism i etnicheskoe raznoobrazie v Rossii. Rossiiskaya Politicheskaya Enciklopedia, Moskva, Russia, p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Ilchenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ilchenko, M.S. (2013). Institutionalization of Intergovernmental Relations in a Federal State: Bilateral Treaties Under “New Centralism” in Russia. In: López - Basaguren, A., Escajedo San Epifanio, L. (eds) The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27717-7_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics