Abstract
The paper addresses the following two questions: (1) How can we conceptualise possible socio-political roles of mathematics-based rationality? (2) How can we conceptualise possible the socio-political roles of mathematics education? Together the two questions might help to shed some light on how mathematical rationality might assume different forms and become integrated into social and technological development. It is pointed out how mathematics-based rationality forms part of the fabrication of possibilities, strategies, facts, contingencies, and perspectives. There is, however, no inherent quality to be associated with such mathematics-based fabrications. It is considered to what extent the school mathematics tradition could establish a prescription readiness by submitting students to a school-mathematics absolutism; and to what extent this tradition could facilitate differentiated labelling of the students, as well as endorsement of an ethical filter. These aspects could be important functions of the school mathematics tradition in today’s knowledge society. It is considered to what extent mathematics education could prepare people for critical citizenship, which includes a potential for ‘talking back’ to authority. I do not see such preparation as being related to the school mathematics tradition, nor do I see it as linked to the very nature of mathematics. Rather, I am proposing it as a possible function of mathematics education.
This chapter is a reprint of an article published in ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education (2007) 39(3), 215–224. DOI 10.1007/s11858-007-0024-5.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
It is not difficult to find contributors to such a book. There have been several studies which exaltedly emphasise the link between mathematics education and democracy. Thus, Hannaford (1998) argues that the mathematical way of arguing is intrinsically connected to democracy, by paying no attention to personal priorities, but only to matters of fact. That mathematics in an axiomatic form and Greek democracy developed in the same historical period is not seen as accidental. See also the discussion in Skovsmose (1994, 1998).
- 2.
For an elaborated discussion of lifeworld see Husserl (1970).
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
‘Bumping’ a passenger means to deny a passenger with a valid ticket access to the plane.
- 6.
See in particular the essay The Assayer, which is reprinted in Galileo (1957, pp. 229–280).
- 7.
I refer to this phenomenon as a mathematical transposition, which I will discuss later.
- 8.
In Alrø and Skovsmose (2002), the notion of bureaucratic absolutism is suggested in order to clarify this possible aspect of the school mathematics tradition. The point is that the nature of command comes to include the pattern of communication in the classroom, and in this way comes to frame the learning of mathematics.
- 9.
This exaggerated use of the right–wrong distinction has been addressed in terms of an ideology of certainty. See Borba and Skovsmose (1997).
- 10.
This possibility was celebrated by logical positivism, which found Galilei’s insight important. What could be counted as ‘secondary sense qualities’, generally speaking, were secondary from a scientific point of view.
- 11.
- 12.
See also Skovsmose and Valero (2001), for a discussion of the notion of democracy.
- 13.
See also Gutstein (2006).
- 14.
- 15.
References
Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Borba, M., & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The ideology of certainty in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(3), 17–23.
Christensen, O. R. (2003). Exploring the borderland: A study on reflections in university science education. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University, Aalborg.
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press. (First published 1916.)
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: The Random House. (Original French edition 1954.)
Gallilei, G. (1957). Discoveries and opinions of Galileo. Translated with an introduction and notes by Stillman Drake. New York: Anchor Books.
Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.
Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading the world with mathematics. New York: Routledge.
Hannaford, C. (1998). Mathematics teaching is democratic education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 98(6), 181–187.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. (First published 1936.)
Jacobini, O. R. (2004). A Modelagem Matemática como Instrumento de Ação Política na Sala de Aula. Doctoral thesis, Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Skovsmose, O. (1998). Linking mathematics education and democracy: Citizenship, mathematics archaeology, mathemacy and deliberative interaction. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 98(6), 195–203.
Skovsmose, O. (2005). Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Skovsmose, O. (2006a). Reflections as a challenge. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 2006(4), 323–332.
Skovsmose, O. (2006b). Challenges for mathematics education research. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practiced (pp. 33–50). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2001). Breaking political neutrality: The critical engagement of mathematics education with democracy. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education (pp. 37–55). Mahwah (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2002). Democratic access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 383–407). Mahwah (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum.
Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2005). Mathematics education and social justice: Facing the paradoxes of the informational society. Utbildning & Demokrati, 14(2), 57–71.
Skovsmose, O., & Yasukawa, K. (2004). Formatting power of ‘Mathematics in a package’: A challenge for social theorising? Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 18. http://www.ex.ac.uk/~PErnest/pome18/contents.htm.
Valero, P. (1999). Deliberative mathematics education for social democratization in Latin America. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 1998(6), 20–26.
Valero, P. (2002). Reform, democracy, and mathematics education: Towards a socio-political frame for understanding change in the organization of secondary school mathematics. Doctoral thesis, Department of Curriculum Research, Danish University of Education, Copenhagen.
Valero, P. (2004). Socio-political perspectives on mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education (pp. 5–23). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vithal, R. (2003). In search of a pedagogy of conflict and dialogue for mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Vithal, R., Christiansen, I. M., & Skovsmose, O. (1995). Project work in university mathematics education: A Danish experience: Aalborg University. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(2), 199–223.
Acknowledgements
This paper makes part of the project ‘Mathematics Education and Democracy’, which is based on a cooperation between Paola Valero, Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University and me. I want to thank Anne Kepple for completing a careful language revision of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skovsmose, O. (2012). Doubtful Rationality. In: Forgasz, H., Rivera, F. (eds) Towards Equity in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27701-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27702-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)