Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Closure of Percutaneous Vascular Access

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

A variety of contemporary closure technologies expand the strategies available to the endovascular interventionalist for vascular access management. The currently available devices have consistently demonstrated the ability to shorten time to hemostasis and ambulation; decrease in access-site-related bleeding complications has not yet been convincingly shown. Careful observation of users’ instructions of individual devices and operators’ expertise in their use are likely the most critical determinants of clinical success in on-label indications. Further studies are needed to define clinical benefits in specific subsets and to clarify the cost-effectiveness of VCDs in real-life settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biancari F, D’Andrea V, Di Marco C, Savino G, Tiozzo V, Catania A (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. Am Heart J 159:518–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, Siostrzonek P, Mullner M (2004) Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 291:350–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Juergens CP, Leung DY, Crozier JA et al (2004) Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63:166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marso SP, Amin AP, House JA et al (2010) Association between use of bleeding avoidance strategies and risk of periprocedural bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 303:2156–2164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Camenzind E, Grossholz M, Urban P, Dorsaz PA, Didier D, Meier B (1994) Collagen application versus manual compression: a prospective randomized trial for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:655–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, Valentine MC, Nygaard TW (2001) Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52:3–7; discussion 8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chamberlin JR, Lardi AB, McKeever LS et al (1999) Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (Femostop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring abciximab (ReoPro). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 47:143–147; discussion 148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gwechenberger M, Katzenschlager R, Heinz G, Gottsauner-Wolf M, Probst P (1997) Use of a collagen plug versus manual compression for sealing arterial puncture site after cardiac catheterization. Angiology 48:121–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, Knopf WD, Kosinski EJ, Roubin GS (1993) A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1273–1279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schickel SI, Adkisson P, Miracle V, Cronin SN (1999) Achieving femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of methods. Am J Crit Care 8:406–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schrader R, Steinbacher S, Burger W, Kadel C, Vallbracht C, Kaltenbach M (1992) Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: a randomized trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 27:298–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Silber S, Bjorvik A, Muhling H, Rosch A (1998) Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 43:421–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slaughter PM, Chetty R, Flintoft VF et al (1995) A single center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: what are the potential resource savings? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 34:210–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Halkin A et al (2004) Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1200–1209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaitkus PT (2004) A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 16:243–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kussmaul WG 3rd, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL et al (1995) Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1685–1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deuling JH, Vermeulen RP, Anthonio RA et al (2008) Closure of the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of Angio-Seal, StarClose, and manual compression. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:518–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin JL, Pratsos A, Magargee E et al (2008) A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 71:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ward SR, Casale P, Raymond R, Kussmaul WG 3rd, Simpfendorfer C (1998) Efficacy and safety of a hemostatic puncture closure device with early ambulation after coronary angiography. Angio-Seal Investigators. Am J Cardiol 81:569–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Azmoon S, Pucillo AL, Aronow WS et al (2010) Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention following hemostasis with the Mynx vascular closure device versus the AngioSeal vascular closure device. J Invasive Cardiol 22:175–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Applegate RJ, Grabarczyk MA, Little WC et al (2002) Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:78–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cura FA, Kapadia SR, L’Allier PL et al (2000) Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet blockade. Am J Cardiol 86:780–782, A9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Duffin DC, Muhlestein JB, Allisson SB et al (2001) Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices. J Invasive Cardiol 13:354–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Applegate RJ, Rankin KM, Little WC, Kahl FR, Kutcher MA (2003) Restick following initial Angioseal use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 58:181–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scheinert D, Sievert H, Turco MA et al (2007) The safety and efficacy of an extravascular, water-soluble sealant for vascular closure: initial clinical results for Mynx. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:627–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fields JD, Liu KC, Lee DS et al (2010) Femoral artery complications associated with the Mynx closure device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1737–1740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Noor S, Meyers S, Curl R (2010) Successful reduction of surgeries secondary to arterial access site complications: a retrospective review at a single center with an extravascular closure device. Vasc Endovascular Surg 44:345–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Islam MA, George AK, Norris M (2010) Popliteal artery embolization with the Mynx closure device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:35–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Garasic JM, Marin L, Anderson RD (2009) Acute evaluation of the Mynx vascular closure device during arterial re-puncture in an ovine model. J Invasive Cardiol 21:283–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bavry AA, Raymond RE, Bhatt DL et al (2008) Efficacy of a novel procedure sheath and closure device during diagnostic catheterization: the multicenter randomized clinical trial of the FISH device. J Invasive Cardiol 20:152–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong SC, Bachinsky W, Cambier P et al (2009) A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure’s Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:785–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Carere RG, Webb JG, Ahmed T, Dodek AA (1996) Initial experience using Prostar: a new device for percutaneous suture-mediated closure of arterial puncture sites. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 37:367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Assali AR, Sdringola S, Moustapha A et al (2003) Outcome of access site in patients treated with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the era of closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 58:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baim DS, Knopf WD, Hinohara T et al (2000) Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. Am J Cardiol 85:864–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Sumitsuji S (2003) Clinical effectiveness of the Prostar XL suture-mediated percutaneous vascular closure device following PCI: results of the Perclose AcceleRated Ambulation and DISchargE (PARADISE) Trial. J Invasive Cardiol 15:251–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Starnes BW, O’Donnell SD, Gillespie DL et al (2003) Percutaneous arterial closure in peripheral vascular disease: a prospective randomized evaluation of the Perclose device. J Vasc Surg 38:263–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tron C, Koning R, Eltchaninoff H et al (2003) A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA. J Interv Cardiol 16:217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerckens U, Cattelaens N, Lampe EG, Grube E (1999) Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. Am J Cardiol 83:1658–1663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Noguchi T, Miyazaki S, Yasuda S et al (2000) A randomised controlled trial of Prostar Plus for haemostasis in patients after coronary angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19:451–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rickli H, Unterweger M, Sutsch G et al (2002) Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57:297–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wetter DR, Rickli H, von Smekal A, Amann FW (2000) Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11:1033–1037

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kornowski R, Brandes S, Teplitsky I et al (2002) Safety and efficacy of a 6 French perclose arterial suturing device following percutaneous coronary interventions: a pilot evaluation. J Invasive Cardiol 14:741–745

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Carere RG, Webb JG, Buller CE et al (2000) Suture closure of femoral arterial puncture sites after coronary angioplasty followed by same-day discharge. Am Heart J 139:52–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Doyle BJ, Godfrey MJ, Lennon RJ et al (2007) Initial experience with the Cardiva Boomerang vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hermiller J, Simonton C, Hinohara T et al (2005) Clinical experience with a circumferential clip-based vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 17:504–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hermiller JB, Simonton C, Hinohara T et al (2006) The StarClose Vascular Closure System: interventional results from the CLIP study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68:677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Branzan D, Sixt S, Rastan A et al (2009) Safety and efficacy of the StarClose vascular closure system using 7-F and 8-F sheath sizes: a consecutive single-center analysis. J Endovasc Surg 16:475–482

    Google Scholar 

  48. Veerina K (2011) Arterial closure is now the first step. Cath Lab Digest 19:32

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ahmed B, Piper WD, Malenka D et al (2009) Significantly improved vascular complications among women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Northern New England Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:423–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA et al (2008) Trends in vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery, 1998 to 2007. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1:317–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Arora N, Matheny ME, Sepke C, Resnic FS (2007) A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. Am Heart J 153:606–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sanborn TA, Ebrahimi R, Manoukian SV et al (2010) Impact of femoral vascular closure devices and antithrombotic therapy on access site bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3:57–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Doyle BJ, Ting HH, Bell MR et al (2008) Major femoral bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and impact on long-term survival among 17,901 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2005. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1:202–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Roe MT, Messenger JC, Weintraub WS et al (2010) Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:254–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dauerman HL, Rao SV, Resnic FS, Applegate RJ (2011) Bleeding avoidance strategies. Consensus and controversy. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tavris DR, Gallauresi BA, Lin B et al (2004) Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use and gender. J Invasive Cardiol 16:459–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dangas G, Mehran R, Kokolis S et al (2001) Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:638–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Bangalore S, Arora N, Resnic FS (2009) Vascular closure device failure: frequency and implications: a propensity-matched analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:549–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Farouque HM, Tremmel JA, Raissi Shabari F et al (2005) Risk factors for the development of retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:363–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Tiroch KA, Arora N, Matheny ME, Liu C, Lee TC, Resnic FS (2008) Risk predictors of retroperitoneal hemorrhage following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 102:1473–1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Resnic FS, Blake GJ, Ohno-Machado L, Selwyn AP, Popma JJ, Rogers C (2001) Vascular closure devices and the risk of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors. Am J Cardiol 88:493–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Warren BS, Warren SG, Miller SD (1999) Predictors of complications and learning curve using the Angio-Seal closure device following interventional and diagnostic catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 48:162–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Balzer JO, Scheinert D, Diebold T, Haufe M, Vogl TJ, Biamino G (2001) Postinterventional transcutaneous suture of femoral artery access sites in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a study of 930 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 53:174–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Resnic FS, Wang TY, Arora N et al (2012) Quantifying the learning curve in the use of a novel vascular closure device: an analysis of the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) CathPCI registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 5(1):82–89

    Google Scholar 

  65. Applegate RJ, Sacrinty M, Kutcher MA et al (2006) Vascular complications with newer generations of angioseal vascular closure devices. J Interv Cardiol 19:67–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lasic Z, Mehran R, Dangas G et al (2004) Comparison of safety and efficacy between first and second generation of angio-seal closure devices in interventional patients. J Invasive Cardiol 16:356–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ben-Dor I, Looser P, Bernardo N et al (2011) Comparison of closure strategies after balloon aortic valvuloplasty: suture mediated versus collagen based versus manual. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 78:119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Feldman T (2000) Percutenous suture closure for management of large French size arterial and venous puncture. J Interv Cardiol 13:237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Haas PC, Krajcer Z, Diethrich EB (1999) Closure of large percutaneous access sites using the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgery device. J Endovasc Surg 6:168–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Howell M, Villareal R, Krajcer Z (2001) Percutaneous access and closure of femoral artery access sites associated with endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Surg 8:68–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Lee WA, Brown MP, Nelson PR, Huber TS, Seeger JM (2008) Midterm outcomes of femoral arteries after percutaneous endovascular aortic repair using the Preclose technique. J Vasc Surg 47:919–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Marchant D, Schwartz R, Chepurko L, Katz S (2000) Access site management after aortic valvuloplasty using a suture mediated closure device: clinical experience in 4 cases. J Invasive Cardiol 12:474–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Michaels AD, Ports TA (2001) Use of a percutaneous arterial suture device (Perclose) in patients undergoing percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 53:445–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Mylonas I, Sakata Y, Salinger M, Sanborn TA, Feldman T (2006) The use of percutaneous suture-mediated closure for the management of 14 French femoral venous access. J Invasive Cardiol 18:299–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Solomon LW, Fusman B, Jolly N, Kim A, Feldman T (2001) Percutaneous suture closure for management of large French size arterial puncture in aortic valvuloplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 13:592–596

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Teh LG, Sieunarine K, van Schie G et al (2001) Use of the percutaneous vascular surgery device for closure of femoral access sites during endovascular aneurysm repair: lessons from our experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 22:418–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Traul DK, Clair DG, Gray B, O’Hara PJ, Ouriel K (2000) Percutaneous endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a feasibility study. J Vasc Surg 32:770–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Morasch MD, Kibbe MR, Evans ME et al (2004) Percutaneous repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 40:12–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Torsello GB, Kasprzak B, Klenk E, Tessarek J, Osada N, Torsello GF (2003) Endovascular suture versus cutdown for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective randomized pilot study. J Vasc Surg 38:78–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Bhatt DL, Raymond RE, Feldman T et al (2002) Successful “pre-closure” of 7Fr and 8Fr femoral arteriotomies with a 6Fr suture-based device (the Multicenter Interventional Closer Registry). Am J Cardiol 89:777–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Sumitsuji S, Tsuji T, Tamai H (2005) The safety and efficacy of “pre-closure” utilizing the Closer suture-mediated vascular closure device for achievement of hemostasis in patients following coronary interventions: results of the second Perclose Accelerated Ambulation and Discharge (PARADISE II) Trial. J Invasive Cardiol 17:30–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Lee WA, Brown MP, Nelson PR, Huber TS (2007) Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (“Preclose” technique). J Vasc Surg 45:1095–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Izquierdo L, Criado E, Leiva L, Aguinaco A, Zotta R, Solares JI (2009) Triple-wire: a variation of the “Preclose” technique. Ann Vasc Surg 23:713–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kahlert P, Eggebrecht H, Erbel R, Sack S (2008) A modified “preclosure” technique after percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72:877–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Bowers BS, Head S, Brown D (2010) Temporary ­aortic occlusion to facilitate large-bore arterial closure. J Invasive Cardiol 22:503–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sharp AS, Michev I, Maisano F et al (2010) A new technique for vascular access management in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:784–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Bui QT, Kolansky DM, Bannan A, Herrmann HC (2010) “Double wire” angio-seal closure technique after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:488–492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Fallahi A, Kim M (2010) Initial experience of removal of 10-French sheaths using the 8-French Angio-Seal vascular closure device. J Invasive Cardiol 22:130–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Korngold EC, Inglessis I, Garasic JM (2009) A novel technique for 14 French arteriotomy closure after percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty using two Mynx closure devices. J Interv Cardiol 22:179–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Katzenschlager R, Tischler R, Kalchhauser G, Panny M, Hirschl M (2009) Angio-Seal use in patients with peripheral arterial disease (ASPIRE). Angiology 60:536–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Rashid MN, Ahmed B, Straight F et al (2008) Extravascular closure for patients with high-risk femoral anatomy. J Invasive Cardiol 20:328–332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Gray BH, Miller R, Langan EM 3rd, Joels CS, Yasin Y, Kalbaugh CA (2009) The utility of the StarClose arterial closure device in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Ann Vasc Surg 23:341–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Marcuzzi D et al (2010) Efficacy and long-term safety of StarClose for hemostasis of arterial puncture sites distal to common femoral artery bifurcation after percutaneous coronary interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 22:505–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Bangalore S, Vidi VD, Liu CB, Shah PB, Resnic FS (2011) Efficacy and safety of the nitinol clip-based vascular closure device (Starclose) for closure of common femoral arterial cannulation at or near the bifurcation: a propensity score-adjusted analysis. J Invasive Cardiol 23:194–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Ellis SG, Bhatt D, Kapadia S, Lee D, Yen M, Whitlow PL (2006) Correlates and outcomes of retroperitoneal hemorrhage complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67:541–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Kulick DL, Rediker DE (1999) Use of the Perclose device in the brachial artery after coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 46:111–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Gliech V, Dubel HP, Rutsch W (2001) Suture closure of the brachial artery access site post-coronary catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 13:12–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Kim A, Fusman B, Jolly N, Feldman T (2002) Percutaneous suture closure for brachial artery puncture. J Interv Cardiol 15:277–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Belenky A, Aranovich D, Greif F, Bachar G, Bartal G, Atar E (2007) Use of a collagen-based device for closure of low brachial artery punctures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30:273–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Bilecen D, Bongartz G, Ostheim-Dzerowycz W (2006) Off-label use of Angio-Seal vascular closure device for brachial artery puncture closure-deployment modification and initial results after transbrachial PTA. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31:431–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Lupattelli T, Clerissi J, Clerici G et al (2008) The efficacy and safety of closure of brachial access using the AngioSeal closure device: experience with 161 interventions in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 47:782–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Puggioni A, Boesmans E, Deloose K, Peeters P, Bosiers M (2008) Use of StarClose for brachial artery closure after percutaneous endovascular interventions. Vascular 16:85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Cirillo P, Petrillo G, D’Ascoli GL, Piscione F, Chiariello M (2010) Successful use of the Cardiva Boomerang vascular closure device to close a brachial artery puncture site after emergency PTCA. Heart Vessels 25:565–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Henry M, Amor M, Allaoui M, Tricoche O (1995) A new access site management tool: the Angio-Seal hemostatic puncture closure device. J Endovasc Surg 2:289–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Hoffmann K, Schott U, Erb M, Albes J, Claussen CD, Duda SH (1998) Remote suturing for percutaneous closure of popliteal artery access. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 43:477–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Noory E, Rastan A, Sixt S et al (2008) Arterial puncture closure using a clip device after transpopliteal retrograde approach for recanalization of the superficial femoral artery. J Endovasc Surg 15:310–314

    Google Scholar 

  107. Sakata Y, Syed Z, Salinger MH, Feldman T (2005) Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty: antegrade transseptal vs. conventional retrograde transarterial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64:314–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Shaw JA, Dewire E, Nugent A, Eisenhauer AC (2004) Use of suture-mediated vascular closure devices for the management of femoral vein access after transcatheter procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63:439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Mahadevan VS, Jimeno S, Benson LN, McLaughlin PR, Horlick EM (2008) Pre-closure of femoral venous access sites used for large-sized sheath insertion with the Perclose device in adults undergoing cardiac intervention. Heart 94:571–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Coto HA (2002) Closure of the femoral vein puncture site after transcatheter procedures using Angio-Seal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 55:16–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Bovenschulte H, Chang DH, Michels G, Kochanek M, Liebig T, Bangard C (2011) Technical note: misplaced 13F-dialysis catheter in the subclavian artery – controlled removal with an undersized 8F-collagen closure system (AngioSeal(R)) and endovascular balloon fixation. RoFo 183:758–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Chemelli AP, Wiedermann F, Klocker J et al (2010) Endovascular management of inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during subclavian vein cannulation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:470–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Devriendt A, Tran-Ngoc E, Gottignies P et al (2009) Ease of using a dedicated percutaneous closure device after inadvertent cannulation of the subclavian artery: case report. Case Report Med 2009:728629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Dowling K, Herr A, Siskin G, Sansivero GE, Stainken B (1999) Use of a collagen plug device to seal a subclavian artery puncture secondary to intraarterial dialysis catheter placement. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:33–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Kirkwood ML, Wahlgren CM, Desai TR (2008) The use of arterial closure devices for incidental arterial injury. Vasc Endovascular Surg 42:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Micha JP, Goldstein BH, Lindsay SF et al (2007) Subclavian artery puncture repair with Angio-Seal deployment. Gynecol Oncol 104:761–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Nicholson T, Ettles D, Robinson G (2004) Managing inadvertent arterial catheterization during central venous access procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:21–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Railo M, Roth WD (2004) The use of a collagen-based puncture closure device in the subclavian artery after inadvertent introduction of an 11.5 French hemodialysis catheter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 27:681–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Shetty SV, Kwolek CJ, Garasic JM (2007) Percutaneous closure after inadvertent subclavian artery cannulation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:1050–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Berlet MH, Steffen D, Shaughness G, Hanner J (2001) Closure using a surgical closure device of inadvertent subclavian artery punctures during central venous catheter placement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:122–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Fraizer MC, Chu WW, Gudjonsson T, Wolff MR (2003) Use of a percutaneous vascular suture device for closure of an inadvertent subclavian artery puncture. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 59:369–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Meyhoefer J, Lehmann H, Minden HH, Butter C (2006) Closure of the subclavian artery puncture site with a percutaneous suture device after removal of an arterial pacemaker lead. Europace 8:1070–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Wallace MJ, Ahrar K (2001) Percutaneous closure of a subclavian artery injury after inadvertent catheterization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1227–1230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Powers CJ, Zomorodi AR, Britz GW, Enterline DS, Miller MJ, Smith TP (2011) Endovascular management of inadvertent brachiocephalic arterial catheterization. J Neurosurg 114:146–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Tran V, Shiferson A, Hingorani AP et al (2009) Use of the StarClose device for closure of inadvertent subclavian artery punctures. Ann Vasc Surg 23:688.e11–688.e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Blanc R, Mounayer C, Piotin M, Sadik JC, Spelle L, Moret J (2002) Hemostatic closure device after carotid puncture for stent and coil placement in an intracranial aneurysm: technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:978–981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Hatfield MK, Zaleski GX, Kozlov D, Woo T, Gentile E, Sinnen J (2004) Angio-seal device used for hemostasis in the descending aorta. Am J Roentgenol 183:612–614

    Google Scholar 

  128. Brown SC, Boshoff DE, Rega F et al (2009) Transapical left ventricular access for difficult to reach interventional targets in the left heart. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74:137–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Murarka S, Heuser RR (2010) A novel method of ventricular closure following transapical access. Future Cardiol 6:881–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Barbash IM, Saikus CE, Ratnayaka K et al (2011) Limitations of closing percutaneous transthoracic ventricular access ports using a commercial collagen vascular closure device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:1079–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Resnic FS, Arora N, Matheny M, Reynolds MR (2007) A cost-minimization analysis of the angio-seal vascular closure device following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 99:766–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Pei-Hsiu Huang M.D.

  2. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Frederic S. Resnic M.D., M.Sc.

  3. Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Frederic S. Resnic M.D., M.Sc.

Authors
  1. Pei-Hsiu Huang M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frederic S. Resnic M.D., M.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederic S. Resnic M.D., M.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Dept. of Internal Medicine, Gesundheitszentrum Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 2, Bitterfeld-Wolfen, 06749, Germany

    Peter Lanzer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huang, PH., Resnic, F.S. (2013). Closure of Percutaneous Vascular Access. In: Lanzer, P. (eds) Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27675-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27676-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation