Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Femoral and Brachial Artery Access

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions

  • 3276 Accesses

Abstract

The selection of vascular access site is the first critical decision to be made when planning any endovascular procedure. The choice of access site is influenced by patient and procedural considerations, with the operator seeking to balance the benefits and risks unique to each access site. This chapter reviews transfemoral and transbrachial vascular access, two principle access sites used widely for endovascular therapies. Optimizing technique of access for any site has been shown to reduce the frequency of access site complications, which remain among the most common and serious adverse events following endovascular interventions. Use of consistent and meticulous access techniques as well as routine angiography of the femoral access site is recommended. Common vascular access site complications are reviewed, including access site bleeding, compromise of vessel wall integrity, and compromise of perfusion due to dissection or embolization. Unique anatomical considerations of brachial artery access that increase the potential for complications are reviewed, and recommendations for minimizing risks for this access site are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Seldinger SI (1953) Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol 39(5):368–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao SV, Ou F-S, Wang TY et al (2008) Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(4):379–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kern MJ (2009) Cardiac catheterization on the road less traveled: navigating the radial versus femoral debate. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2(11):1055–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Samal AK, White CJ (2002) Percutaneous management of access site complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(1):12–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis SG, Bhatt D, Kapadia S, Lee D, Yen M, Whitlow PL (2006) Correlates and outcomes of retroperitoneal hemorrhage complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(4):541–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiroch KA, Arora N, Matheny ME, Liu C, Lee TC, Resnic FS (2008) Risk predictors of retroperitoneal hemorrhage following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 102(11):1473–1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tortora GJ, Grabowski SR (2003) Principles of anatomy and physiology, 10th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sherev DA, Shaw RE, Brent BN (2005) Angiographic predictors of femoral access site complications: implication for planned percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65(2):196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garrett PD, Eckart RE, Bauch TD, Thompson CM, Stajduhar KC (2005) Fluoroscopic localization of the femoral head as a landmark for common femoral artery cannulation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65(2):205–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raphael M, Hartnell G (2001) Femoral artery catheterization and retroperitoneal haematoma formation. Clin Radiol 56(11):933–934; author reply 934–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schnyder G, Sawhney N, Whisenant B, Tsimikas S, Turi ZG (2001) Common femoral artery anatomy is influenced by demographics and comorbidity: implications for cardiac and peripheral invasive studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 53(3):289–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM et al (2010) Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (femoral arterial access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3(7):751–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dudeck O, Teichgraeber U, Podrabsky P, Lopez Haenninen E, Soerensen R, Ricke J (2004) A randomized trial assessing the value of ultrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery for interventional investigations. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20(5):363–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawamura A, Piemonte TC, Nesto RW, Gossman DE (2006) Retroperitoneal hemorrhage from inferior epigastric artery: value of femoral angiography for detection and management. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68(2):267–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wheatley BJ, Mansour MA, Grossman PM et al (2011) Complication rates for percutaneous lower extremity arterial antegrade access. Arch Surg 146(4):432–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutzeit A, Graf N, Schoch E, Sautter T, Jenelten R, Binkert CA (2011) Ultrasound-guided antegrade femoral access: comparison between the common femoral artery and the superficial femoral artery. Eur Radiol 21(6):1323–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yeow KM, Toh CH, Wu CH et al (2002) Sonographically guided antegrade common femoral artery access. J Ultrasound Med 21(12):1413–1416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartnell G (1998) An improved reversal technique from retrograde to antegrade femoral artery cannulation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 21(6):512–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Basche S, Eger C, Aschenbach R (2004) Transbrachial angiography: an effective and safe approach. Vasa 33(4):231–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gan HW, Yip HK, Wu CJ (2010) Brachial approach for coronary angiography and intervention: totally obsolete, or a feasible alternative when radial access is not possible? Ann Acad Med Singapore 39(5):368–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Babu SC, Piccorelli GO, Shah PM, Stein JH, Clauss RH (1989) Incidence and results of arterial complications among 16,350 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. J Vasc Surg 10(2):113–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoury M, Batra S, Berg R, Rama K, Kozul V (1992) Influence of arterial access sites and interventional procedures on vascular complications after cardiac catheterizations. Am J Surg 164(3):205–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R (1997) A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29(6):1269–1275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hildick-Smith DJ, Khan ZI, Shapiro LM, Petch MC (2002) Occasional-operator percutaneous brachial coronary angiography: first, do no arm. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(2):161–165; discussion 166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alvarez-Tostado JA, Moise MA, Bena JF et al (2009) The brachial artery: a critical access for endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 49(2):378–385; discussion 385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Proudfit WL, Shirey EK, Sones FM Jr (1966) Selective cine coronary arteriography. Correlation with clinical findings in 1,000 patients. Circulation 33(6):901–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fergusson DJ, Kamada RO (1981) Percutaneous entry of the brachial artery for left heart catheterization using a sheath. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 7(1):111–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lupattelli T, Clerissi J, Clerici G et al (788) The efficacy and safety of closure of brachial access using the AngioSeal closure device: experience with 161 interventions in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 47(4):782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmed B, Piper WD, Malenka D et al (2009) Significantly improved vascular complications among women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Northern New England Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry. Circulation 2(5):423–429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Piper WD, Malenka DJ, Ryan TJ Jr et al (2003) Predicting vascular complications in percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J 145(6):1022–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matheny ME, Arora N, Ohno-Machado L, Resnic FS (2007) Rare adverse event monitoring of medical devices with the use of an automated surveillance tool. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 518–522

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sanborn TA, Ebrahimi R, Manoukian SV et al (2010) Impact of femoral vascular closure devices and antithrombotic therapy on access site bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy (ACUITY) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3(1):57–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J et al (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9775):1409–1420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Crudu V, Blankenship J, Berger P, Scott T, Skelding K (2011) Complications related to access site after percutaneous coronary interventions: are the adverse events underreported? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77(5):643–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL et al (2011) Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 123(23):2736–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Applegate RJ, Sacrinty MT, Kutcher MA et al (2008) Trends in vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention via the femoral artery, 1998 to 2007. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 1(3):317–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mehran R, Pocock S, Nikolsky E et al (2011) Impact of bleeding on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention results from a patient-level pooled analysis of the REPLACE-2 (randomized evaluation of PCI linking angiomax to reduced clinical events), ACUITY (acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy), and HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4(6):654–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Smith SC Jr et al (2011) Risk factors and outcomes for patients with vascular disease and serious bleeding events. Heart 97:1507–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ndrepepa G, Berger PB, Mehilli J et al (2008) Periprocedural bleeding and 1-year outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions: appropriateness of including bleeding as a component of a quadruple end point. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(7):690–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lindsey JB, Marso SP, Pencina M et al (2009) Prognostic impact of periprocedural bleeding and myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention in unselected patients: results from the EVENT (evaluation of drug-eluting stents and ischemic events) registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2(11):1074–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Farouque HM, Tremmel JA, Raissi Shabari F et al (2005) Risk factors for the development of retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 45(3):363–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kent KC, McArdle CR, Kennedy B, Baim DS, Anninos E, Skillman JJ (1993) A prospective study of the clinical outcome of femoral pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulas induced by arterial puncture. J Vasc Surg 17(1):125–131; discussion 131–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Toursarkissian B, Allen BT, Petrinec D et al (1997) Spontaneous closure of selected iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulae. J Vasc Surg 25(5):803–808; discussion 808–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R (1997) Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 40(2):156–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kiemeneij F (2006) Prevention and management of radial artery spasm. J Invasive Cardiol 18(4):159–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M et al (2010) Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3(5):475–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zellner C, Yeghiazarians Y, Ports TA, Ursell P, Boyle AJ (2011) Sterile radial artery granuloma after transradial cardiac catheterization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 12(3):187–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Horlocker TT, Bishop AT (1995) Compartment syndrome of the forearm and hand after brachial artery cannulation. Anesth Analg 81(5):1092–1094

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Whatling PJ, Galland RB (1999) Isolated compartment syndrome of the hand after brachial embolectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 17(5):446–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    George V. Moukarbel M.D.

  2. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Frederic S. Resnic M.D., M.Sc.

  3. Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Frederic S. Resnic M.D., M.Sc.

Authors
  1. George V. Moukarbel M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frederic S. Resnic M.D., M.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederic S. Resnic M.D., M.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Dept. of Internal Medicine, Gesundheitszentrum Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Straße 2, Bitterfeld-Wolfen, 06749, Germany

    Peter Lanzer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moukarbel, G.V., Resnic, F.S. (2013). Femoral and Brachial Artery Access. In: Lanzer, P. (eds) Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27675-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27676-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation