Abstract
In this introductory chapter we provide an overview of the problems addressed in the book. Altered flows in regulated rivers generally have strong negative impacts on most aquatic organisms and on those in the riparian zone, as well as detrimental effects on recreational possibilities and aesthetic values associated with rivers. On the other hand, hydropower offers energy free from emissions to air. In addition, hydropower is extremely cost-effective in countries with suitable natural conditions, like Norway and Sweden. Taken together, these facts suggests a conflict between competing uses of river resources in general and between policy objectives in particular. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) offers a formal approach to delineating the costs and benefits of a changed (water) policy and results in information that may provide useful information about policies. Because the origins of empirical CBA can be traced back to dam constructions in the US in the 1930s, there is a very substantial body of relevant literature to tap. We briefly discuss the central results of this literature and contrast our own analysis to the ”older” literature. Finally, we present the particular hydropower plant that is the focus of this book. The two scenarios that we consider are introduced. Both scenarios imply that water is diverted from electricity generation to the natural river channel (dryway) creating environmental and recreational benefits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In Europe the approach is typically denoted cost-benefit analysis while in the U.S. it is often denoted benefit-cost analysis. We will throughout follow the European tradition in this respect.
- 2.
The classic study is [32]. There is a rather extensive similar literature in the Nordic countries. Indeed, the hydropower expansion in Norway was subject to intensive analysis using various methods to describe the consequences. Reference [148] has a summary of the literature on the value of recreational fishing, including a survey of Nordic studies. In a recent CBA of hydropower-salmon conflicts in Sweden, [72] presents a detailed analysis of changing the water regime to the benefit of wild salmon.
- 3.
Also known as renewable electricity certificates.
- 4.
According to [125]. Its normal annual production is 340 gigawatt hours (GWh) according to www.Kuhlins.com.
- 5.
Several of the numbers used in this section to describe the scenario and the area are lifted from a project companion report, focussing the natural science measurement at the plant, see [154].
- 6.
From an ecological point of view the optimal flow mimics the natural flow. A “natural flow” scenario was considered but not implemented in our study due to its complexity.
- 7.
Svenska Naturskyddsföreningens yttrande ang. Dönje kraftverk vid Bollnäs, letter to Advokatfiskalsämbetet vid Kungl Maj:ts och Rikets Kammarkollegium, dated 15 march 1950, on file at Bollnas municipality archives, Box EIV a:4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johansson, PO., Kriström, B. (2012). Introduction. In: The Economics of Evaluating Water Projects. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27670-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27670-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27669-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27670-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)