Abstract
That individuals, communities, and organizations need to change patterns of behavior and interactions to create a sustainable future for the biosphere has become a widely accepted concept in both organizational practice and sustainability research from multiple disciplinary perspectives. Information systems and the organizational, community and individual actions they support have the potential to alter the current trajectory of resource consumption, negative environmental impacts, and ecosystem degradation. Although the Information Systems discipline has begun to address the problem of environmental sustainability, current models adhere to a technologic-managerial mindset which supports the organizational status quo. By critiquing the assumptions of the established Triple Bottom Line framework, this research proposes that Information Systems research can be expanded in three directions: addressing collective rather than individual actions, creating, measuring and monitoring a broad range of environmental impact measures, and designing organizational learning systems that enable adaptive management practices in the face of unpredictable and nonlinear environmental changes. Recognition of these additional research avenues will emphasize the difficulty of the problem domain and support transformational research thinking.
Keywords
- Ecosystem Service
- Information System
- Environmental Sustainability
- Ecological Footprint
- Triple Bottom Line
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
“Ecosystem services are the conditions and processes through which natural ecosystems, and the species that make them up, sustain and fulfill human life” (Daily, 1997, p. 3).
References
Armstrong, D., Castro, I., & Griffiths, R. (2007). Using adaptive management to determine requirements of re-introduced populations: The case of the New Zealand hihi. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 953–962.
Bartlett, A. A. (1994). Reflections on sustainability, population growth, and the environment. Population and Environment, 16(1), 5–35.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: World commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., Van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P. W., Almond, R. E. A., & Watson, R. (2010). Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164–1168.
Daily, G. (1997). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
DeSimone, L. D., & Popoff, F. (1997). Eco-efficiency: The business link to sustainable development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., & Brynjarsdottir, H. (2010). Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. Paper presented at the CHI, Atlanta.
Dourish, P. (2010). HCI and environmental sustainability: The politics of design and the design of politics. Paper presented at the DIS 2010, Aarhus, Denmark.
Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 55–73.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.
Elliot, S. (2011). Transdisciplinary perspective on environmental sustainability: A resource base and framework of IT-enabled business transformation. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 197–236.
Ellis, E. C., & Ramankutty, N. (2008). Putting people in the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(8), 439–447. 6(8), 439–447.
Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2004). Sustainable value added. Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 48(2), 173–187.
Gibson, K. (2006). Business ethics: People, profits, and the planet. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gliessman, S. R. (1990). Agroecology: Researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture. London: Springer.
Gould, K. A., Pellow, D. N., & Schnaiberg, A. (2004). Interrogating the treadmill of production: Everything you wanted to know about the treadmill but were afraid to ask. Organization & Environment, 17, 296–316.
Gray, R. H., & Bebbington, K. J. (2000). Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting? Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1(1), 1–44.
Gray, R., & Milne, M. J. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Who’s kidding whom? Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), 66–70.
Hanley, N., Shogren, J., & White, B. (2007). Environmental economics in theory and practice. London: Palgrave.
Hannigan, J. (2006). Environmental sociology: A social constructionist perspective. New York: Routledge.
Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66–77.
Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–69.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in IS research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–106.
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan.
Kondoh, K. (2009). The challenge of climate change and energy policies for building a sustainable society in Japan. Organization & Environment, 22(1), 52–74.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Second thoughts on paradigms. In The essential tension (pp. 293–319). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Malhotra, A., Melville, N., & Watson, R. (2011). CfP information systems and environmental sustainability. MIS Quarterly, Special Issue Call for Papers.
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle. New York: North Point Press.
Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. Hartland: Sustainability Institute.
Melville, N. P. (2010). Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 1–21.
Milne, M. J., Ball, A., & Gray, R. (2008). Wither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and the institutionalization of corporate sustainability reporting. American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, Anaheim.
Mol, A., & Janicke, M. (2009). The origins and theoretical foundations of ecological modernisation theory. In A. Mol, D. Sonnenfled, & G. Spaargaren (Eds.), The ecological modernisation reader: Environmental reform in theory and practice (pp. 1–27). London: Routledge, London, New York.
Norton, B. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pearce, D. (1993). Blueprint 3: Measuring sustainable development. London: Earthscan Publications.
Peterson, G., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (1998). Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems, 1, 6–18.
Rumpff, L., Duncan, D. H., Vesk, P. A., Keith, D. A., & Wintle, B. A. (2011). State-and-transition modelling for adaptive management of native woodlands. Biological Conservation, 144, 1224–1236.
Salafsky, N., Margoluis, R., Redford, K. H., & Robinson, J. G. (2001). Improving the practice of conservation: A conceptual framework and research agenda for conservation science. Conservation Biology, 16(6), 1469–1479.
Savitz, A., & Weber, K. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best run companies are achieving economic, social, and environmental success. San Francisco: Wiley.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Crown Business, London.
Senge, P., Smith, B., Schley, S., Laur, J., & Kruschwitz, N. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: Doubleday.
Suggett, D., & Goodsir, B. (2002). Triple bottom line measurement and reporting in Australia: Making it tangible. Melbourne: Allen Consulting Group.
United Nations. (2011). World population to reach 10 billion by 2100 if fertility in all countries converges to replacement level, New York.
Vanclay, F. 2004 “Impact assessment and the Triple Bottom Line: Competing pathways to sustainability?”, in Cheney, H., Katz, E. & Solomon, F. (eds) Sustainability and Social Science Round Table Proceedings (conference held Dec 2003), Sydney: The Institute for Sustainable Futures (University of Technology, Sydney) together with CSIRO Minerals, 27–39.
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. (1997). Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494–499.
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol6/iss1/art14/
Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M., & Chen, A. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 23–38.
Wilson, E. O. (1994). Biodiversity: Challenge, science, opportunity. American Zoologist, 34, 5–11.
Winsor, D. (2001). Corporate citizenship: Evolution and interpretation. In J. Androif & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship. Greenleaf: Sheffield.
Woodgate, G., & Redclift, M. (1998). From a ‘sociology of nature’ to environmental sociology: Beyond social construction. Environmental Values, 7, 3–24.
York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hovorka, D.S., Labajo, E., Auerbach, N. (2012). Information Systems in Environmental Sustainability: Of Cannibals and Forks. In: vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J. (eds) Green Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27487-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27488-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)