Skip to main content

The Multi-modal Approach to Metastatic Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover European Instructional Lectures

Part of the book series: European Instructional Lectures ((EICL,volume 12))

Abstract

Despite medical and surgical advantages, bone metastases and skeletally- related events such as pathological fractures happen in cancer patients. Even though skeletal metastases and pathological fractures can occur in almost any cancers and sarcomas, about 75% of pathological fractures occur in patients with breast, prostate, lung and kidney cancers and myeloma (Hansen et al., Acta Orthop Scand 75:11–15, 2004; Hansen et al., Acta Orthop 334:85–90, 2009; Ratasvuo et al., Pathological fractures of skeletal metastases – a many sided challenge. A report of 1195 operated metastases. Scandinavian sarcoma group skeletal metastasis registry. Manuscript in preparation, 2011). Skeletal metastases occur in around one-third of patients with these malignancies. Pathological fracture is usually a late manifestation of disease. Pathological fracture causes pain, reduces patients’ functional independence and quality of life if not treated properly. Pathological fractures of the long bones are most common surgical issues in the management of the skeletally-related events. Orthopaedic procedures should be minimally-invasive, producing as little morbidity as possible. However the treatment should aim to be done once and for all and a rapid functional recovery producing maximal pain relief (Ashford, Eur Oncol 5:30–34, 2009; Bauer, J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:608–617, 2005; Clain, Br J Cancer 19:15–29, 1965; Coleman, Clin Cancer Res 12:6243–6249, 2006; Harrington, Cancer 80:1614–1627, 1997; Higinbotham and Marcove, J Trauma 5:792–798, 1965; Weiss and Wedis, Acta Orthop 82:96–101, 2011; Bickels et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1503–1516, 2009; Fottner et al., BMC Musculoskelet Discord 11:145, 2010; Hansen et al., Acta Orthop Scand 75:11–15, 2004; Hansen et al., Acta Orthop 334:85–90, 2009; Jensen et al., BMC Cancer 24:11–29, 2011; Katagini et al., J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B:698–703, 2005; Lin et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1794–1801, 2007; Narazaki et al., Clinics 61:313–320, 2006; Ratasvuo et al., Pathological fractures of skeletal metastases – a many sided challenge. A report of 1195 operated metastases. Scandinavian sarcoma group skeletal metastasis registry. Manuscript in preparation, 2011; Saad et al., Cancer 110:1860–1867, 2007; Wedin et al., Cancer 92:257–262, 2001; Zekri et al., Int J Oncol 19:379–382, 2001). The survival affects the choice of treatment and these issues are discussed later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allan DG, Bells RS, Davis AI, Langer E (1995) Complex acetabular reconstruction for metastatic tumor. J Arthroplasty 10:301–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashford RU (2009) Palliative orthopaedic surgery for skeletal metastases. Eur Oncol 5:30–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer HCF (2005) Controversies in the surgical management of skeletal metastases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:608–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bickels J, Daida S, Lidar Z (2009) Surgical management of metastatic bone disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1503–1516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bickels J, Meller I, Henshaw RM, Malawe MM (2000) Reconstruction of hip stability after proximal and total femur resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 375:218–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clain A (1965) Secondary malignant disease of bone. Br J Cancer 19:15–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman RE (2006) Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 12:6243–6249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christiansen N, Bray F, Gjerstorff ML, Klint A, Kotlum JE, Olafsdottir E, Pukkala E, Strom HH (2010) NORDCAN – a Nordic tool for cancer infromation, planning, quality control and research. Acta Oncol 49:725–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Finstein JL, King JJ, Fox EJ, Ogilvie CM, Lackman RD (2007) Bipolar proximal femoral replacement prostheses for musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 459:66–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fottner A, Szalantzy M, Wirthmann L, Stähler M, Baur-Melnyk A, Jansson V, Dürr HR (2010) Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: patient survival after surgical treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghert M, Alsaleh K, Farrokhyar F, Colterjohn N (2007) Outcomes of an anatomically based approach to metastatic disease of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 459:122–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen BH, Keller J, Laitinen M, Berg P, Skjeldal S, Trovik C, Nilsson J, Walloe A, Kalen A, Wedin R (2009) The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group skeletal metastasis registry, functional outcome and pain after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities. Acta Orthop 334:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hansen BH, Keller J, Laitinen M, Bergh P, Skjeldal S, Trovik C, Nilsson J, Walloe A, Kalen A, Wedin R (2004) The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group skeletal metastasis register survival after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities. Acta Orthop Scand 75:11–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harrington KD (1981) The management of acetabular insufficiency secondary to metastatic malignant disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:653–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrington KD (1997) Orthopaedic surgical management of skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80:1614–1627

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Higinbotham NL, Marcove RC (1965) The management of pathological fractures. J Trauma 5:792–798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen AO, Jacobsen JB, Nørgaard M, Yong M, Fryzek JP, Sørensen HT (2011) Incidence of bone metastases and skeletal-related events in breast cancer patients: a population-based cohort study in Denmark. BMC Cancer 24:11–29

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Wakai K, Sugiura H, Kataoka T, Nakanishi K (2005) Prognostic factors and scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B:698–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kunisada T, Choong PFM (2000) Major reconstruction for periacetabular metastasis. Acta Orthop Scand 71:585–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Laitinen M, Nieminen J, Pakarinen TK (2011) Treatment of pathological humerus shaft fractures with intramedullary nails with or without cement fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:503–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin PP, Mirza AN, Lewis VO, Cannon CP, Tu SM, Tannir NM, Yasko AW (2007) Patient survival after surgery for osseus metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1794–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Menendez LR, Ahlmann ER, Kermani C, Gotha H (2006) Endoprosthetic reconstruction for neoplasms of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 450:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller BJ, Soni EE, Gibbs CP, Scarborough MT (2011) Intramedullary nails for long bone metastases: why do they fail? J Orthop Surg 19:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  24. Narazaki DK, Neto C, Baptista A, Pires de Camargo M (2006) Prognostic factors in pathologic fractures secondary to metastatic tumors. Clinics 61:313–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nilsson J, Gustafson P, Fornander P, Ornstein E (2000) The Harington reconstruction for advanced periacetabular metastatic destruction: good outcome in 32 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71:591–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Piccioli A, Maccauro G, Rossi B, Scaramuzzo L, Frenos F, Capanna R (2010) Surgical treatment of pathological fractures of humerus. Injury 41:1112–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Potter BK, Chow VE, Adams SC, Letson GD, Temple HT (2009) Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement: metastatic versus primary tumors. Surg Oncol 18:343–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ratasvuori M, Hansen BH, Wedin R, Bergh BH, Zaikova O, Trovik C, Schwarz-Lausten G, Walloe A, Vult von Steyern F, Keller J, Laitinen M (2011) Pathological fractures of skeletal metastases- a many sided challenge. A report of 1195 operated metastases. Scandinavian sarcoma group skeletal metastasis registry. Manuscript in preparation

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saad F, Lipton A, Cook R, Chen Y, Smith M, Coleman R (2007) Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer 110:1860–1867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Siegel HJ, Lopez-Ben R, Mann JP, Ponce BA (2010) Pathological fractures of the proximal humerus treated with a proximal humeral locking plate and bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:707–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tillman RM, Myers GJC, Abudu AT, Carter SR, Grimer RJ (2008) The three-pin modified ‘Harrington’ procedure for advanced metastatic destruction of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:84–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ward WG, Holsenbeck S, Doery FJ, Spang J, Howe D (2003) Metastatic disease of the femur: surgical ­treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wedin R, Bauer HCF (2005) Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal lesion. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1653–1657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wedin R, Bauer HC, Rutqvist LE (2001) Surgical treatment for skeletal breast cancer metastases: a ­population based study of 641 patients. Cancer 92:257–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wedin R, Hansen BH, Laitinen M, Trovik C, Zaikova O, Bergh P, Kalen A, Schwarz-Lausten G, Vult von Steyern F, Walloe A, Keller J, Weiss RJ (2011) Complications and survival after treatment of 214 metastatic lesions of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow (epub ahead of print)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weiss KR, Bhumbra R, Biau DJ, Griffin AM, Deheshi B, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC (2011) Fixation of pathological humeral fractures by cemented plate technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1093–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Weiss RJ, Wedin R (2011) Sugery for skeletal metastases in lung cancer, complication and survival in 98 patients. Acta Orthop 82:96–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zekri J, Ahmed N, Coleman RE, Hancock BW (2001) The skeletal metastatic complications of renal cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol 19:379–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minna Laitinen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 EFORT

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laitinen, M., Ratasvuori, M., Pakarinen, TK. (2012). The Multi-modal Approach to Metastatic Disease. In: Bentley, G. (eds) European Instructional Lectures. European Instructional Lectures, vol 12. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27293-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27293-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27292-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27293-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics