Skip to main content

Towards a Decision Support Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sustainable Manufacturing

Abstract

Every enterprise should track and asses its environmental impact for accountability reasons towards its consumers, employees, government, and society. The objective of this study is to design an eco-tracking framework and a decision support system architecture in order to provide energy visibility to enterprises by close monitoring the energy consumption of their manufacturing processes. The proposed architecture uses the energy consumption and production activity data as input. Energy consumption data is collected from meters and production activity data from manufacturing automation equipment (e.g. PLCs, CNCs, etc.). Collected energy data which is stored in a central data warehouse, is processed, contextualized with activity data and transformed to eco-KPIs in order to benchmark energy efficiency of the production processes and enable factory supervisors to make decisions towards better environmental footprint of the enterprise. The proposed decision support framework is founded on Software as a Service (SaaS) approach which can enable fast visibility of data throughout enterprise and provide easy scalability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • United Nations, 1987, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, General Assembly Resolution 42/187, 11 December 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, 2011, How does Commerce define Sustainable Manufacturing?, Available at: http://trade.gov/competitiveness/sustainablemanufacturing/how_doc_defines_SM.asp [Accessed 18 June 2011]

  • Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W.-P., Suh, S., Weidema,.B.P., Pennington, D.W., 2004, Life cycle assessment Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications, Environment International, 30, 701–720

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standards Organization, 1997, ISO 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild, M., Jeswiet, J., Alting, L., 2005, From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 54/2, 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standards Organization, 1998, ISO 14041: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment - Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standards Organization, 2000, ISO 14042: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Life cycle impact assessment, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006, Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice, EPA/600/R-06/060. National Risk Management Research Laboratory. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, D.W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., Lindeijer, E., Jolliet, O., Rydberg, T., Rebitzer, G., 2004, Life cycle assessment Part 2: Current impact assessment practice, Environment International, 30, 721–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative, 2004. A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition, Available at: http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/publ ic/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf [Accessed 18 June 2011]

  • Herzog, T., 2009, World Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2005, World Resources Institute, Available at http://www.wri.org/publication/navigating-the- numbers [Accessed 19 July 2011]

  • Jeswiet, J., Kara, S., 2008, Carbon Emissions and CESTM in Manufacturing, CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 57, 17-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameta, G., Mani, M., Rachuri, S., Feng, S.C., Sriram, R.D., Lyons, K.W., 2009, Carbon Weight Analysis for Machining Operation and Allocation for Redesign, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2/4, 241–251

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist Technology Quarterly, 2011, Following the Footprints, 13-15, Available at: http://www.economi st.com/node/18750670 [Accessed 19 July 2011]

  • Vezzoli, C., Manzini, E., 2008, Design for Environmental Sustainability, Springer – Verlag London Limited

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uluer, M.U., Gök, G., Ünver, H.Ö., Kılıç, S.E. (2012). Towards a Decision Support Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing. In: Seliger, G. (eds) Sustainable Manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27290-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics