Advertisement

Wavelet Based Fuzzy Inference System for Simultaneous Identification and Quantitation of Volatile Organic Compounds Using SAW Sensor Transients

  • Prashant Singh
  • R. D. S. Yadava
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7077)

Abstract

Calibrated identification of volatile organics by electronic sensors needs development of data collection and data processing methods that can efficiently generate vapor identity features and some quantitative measure of its concentration simultaneously. In this paper, we present a simulation study on this based on surface acoustic wave (SAW) chemical sensors functionalized by polymer coating. The analysis utilizes transient responses of SAW sensors exposed to seven volatile organic compounds at various concentrations. The feature extraction is done by discrete wavelet decomposition using Daubechies-2 basis. A fuzzy c-means clustering method based Sugeno-type fuzzy inference system was then roped in for simultaneous identification and concentration estimation. The performance of the method has been analyzed for various conditions of polymer film thickness. It is concluded that there exists an optimum region for film thickness over which the present method yields nearly 100% correct classification with less than 1% concentration error.

Keywords

Wavelet decomposition SAW sensor transients fuzzy clustering and inference quantitative odor recognition electronic nose 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Persaud, K., Dodd, G.: Analysis of Discrimination Mechanisms in the Mammalian Olfactory System Using a Model Nose. Nature 299, 352–355 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rogers, E.K.: Handbook of Biosensors and Electronic Noses: Medicine, Food and Environment. CRC Press (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gardner, J.W., Bartlett, P.N.: Electronic Noses: Principles and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    James, D., Simon, M.S., Ali, Z., William, T.H.: Chemical Sensors for Electronic Nose Systems. Microchim. Acta 149, 1–17 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rock, F., Barsan, N., Weimar, U.: Electronic Nose: Current Status and Future Trends. Chem. Rev. 108, 705–725 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alphus, D.W., Baietto, M.: Applications and Advances in Electronic-Nose Technologies. Sensors 9, 5099–5148 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, P., Yadava, R.D.S.: Effect of Film Thickness and Viscoelasticity on Separability of Vapour Classes by Wavelet and Principal Component Analyses of Polymer-Coated Surface Acoustic Wave Sensor Transients. Meas. Sci. Technol. 22, 025202, 15 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh, P., Yadava, R.D.S.: Feature Extraction by Wavelet Decomposition of Surface Acoustic Wave Sensor Array Transients. Def. Sci. J. 60, 377–386 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, S.J., Frye, G.C., Senturia, S.D.: Dynamics and Response of Polymer-Coated Surface Acoustic Wave Devices: Effect of Viscoelastic Properties and Film Resonance. Anal. Chem. 66, 2201–2219 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yadava, R.D.S., Chaudhary, R.: Solvation, Transduction and Independent Component Analysis for Pattern Recognition in SAW Electronic Nose. Sens. Actuat. B 113, 1–21 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yadava, R.D.S., Kshetrimayum, R., Khaneja, M.: Multifrequency Characterization of Viscoelastic Polymers and Vapor Sensing Based on SAW Oscillators. Ultrasonics 49, 638–645 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crank, J.: The Mathematics of Diffusion. Clarendon, Oxford, sec. 4.3 eq. 4.18 (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singh, P., Yadava, R.D.S.: Using Parametric Nonlinearity in SAW Sensor Transients and Information Fusion for Improving Electronic Nose Intelligence. Int. J. Computational Intelligence Research 6, 919–927 (2010) (Special Conf. Issue ICCI 2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh, P., Yadava, R.D.S.: A Fusion Approach to Feature Extraction by Wavelet Decomposition and Principal Component Analysis in Transient Signal Processing of SAW Odor Sensor Array. Sensors & Transducers J. 126, 64–73 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burrus, C.S., Gopinath, R.A., Guo, H.: Introduction to Wavelets and Wavelet Transforms: A Primer. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mallat, S.: A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation. IEEE Pattern Anal. and Machine Intell. 11, 674–693 (1989)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bezdek, J.C., Ehrlich, R., Full, W.: FCM: The Fuzzy c-Means Clustering Algorithm. Computers & Geosciences 10, 191–203 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nascimento, S., Mirkin, B., Pires, F.: A Fuzzy Clustering Model of Data and Fuzzy c-Means. In: The Ninth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, pp. 302–307 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prashant Singh
    • 1
  • R. D. S. Yadava
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations