Skip to main content

The Role of MAS as a Decision Support Tool in a Water-Rights Market

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7068))

Abstract

Water is an essential and scarce resource. This motivates the development of technologies to make water use more efficient. One such proposal has been to deploy institutional frameworks —referred to as water banks— where water rights may be exchanged more freely and thus foster better water use. Needless to say that good water management is a complex endeavor and the decision to enable a water bank is but one of many actions that policy-makers may take. However, having a water bank is a specially useful device. Once a water bank is enabled, policy-makers may regulate how trading is made and by so doing, have a direct influence on demand and with that foster a “good” use of water. In this paper, we present a decision-support environment constructed around a water-rights market. It is designed so that policy-makers may explore the interplay between i) market regulations, ii) trader profiles and market composition, and iii) the aggregated outcomes of trading under those set conditions. Our environment is designed as a multi-agent system that implements market regulations and is enabled with tools to specify performance indicators, to spawn agent populations and allow humans as well as software agents to participate in simulations of virtual trading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreu, J., Capilla, J., Sanchis, E.: AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. Journal of Hydrology 177(3–4), 269–291 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arcos, J., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J., Sierra, C.: Engineering open environments with electronic institutions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18(2), 191–204 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Argente, E., Giret, A., Valero, S., Julian, V., Botti, V.: Survey of MAS Methods and Platforms focusing on organizational concepts. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 113, pp. 309–316. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botti, V., Garrido, A., Gimeno, J., Giret, A., Igual, F., Noriega, P.: An electronic institution for simulating water-right markets. In: Proceedings of the III Workshop on Agreement Technologies (WAT@IBERAMIA) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cai, X., Lasdon, L., Michelsen, A.: Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130(1), 4–14 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Calatrava, J., Garrido, A.: Water Markets and Customary Allocation Rules: Explaining Some of the Difficulties of Designing Formal Trading Rules. Journal of Economic Issues XL 1, 27–44 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Criado, N., Argente, E., Garrido, A., Gimeno, J.A., Igual, F., Botti, V., Noriega, P., Giret, A.: Norm Enforceability in Electronic Institutions? In: De Vos, M., Fornara, N., Pitt, J.V., Vouros, G. (eds.) COIN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6541, pp. 250–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Easter, K.W., Cortner, H., Seasholes, K., Woodard, G.: Selecting appropriate water policies. Policy Briefs 11908, Environmental and Natural Resources Policy Training Project (1995), http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:epatpb:11908

  9. Esteva, M.: Electronic Institutions: from specification to development. PhD thesis Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 2003. No. 19 in IIIA Monograph Series, IIIA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giret, A., Garrido, A., Gimeno, J.A., Botti, V., Noriega, P.: A MAS decision support tool for water-right markets. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (Demonstrations@AAMAS) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Honey-Roses, J.: Assessing the potential of water trading in Spain. In: ENR 319 Advanced International Environmental Economics. Professor Theo Panayotou at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marinho, M., Kemper, K.: Institutional Frameworks in Successful Water Markets: Brazil, Spain, and Colorado, USA. World Bank Technical Paper No. 427 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Noriega, P.: Agent-Mediated Auctions: The Fishmarket Metaphor. PhD thesis Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 1997. No. 8 in IIIA Monograph Series, IIIA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. North, D.: Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge Univ. Pr. (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer, R., Werick, W., MacEwan, A., Woods, A.: Modeling water resources opportunities, challenges and trade-offs: The use of shared vision modeling for negotiation and conflict resolution. In: Proc. of the Water Resources Planning and Management Conference (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rajasekaram, V., Nandalal, K.: Decision support system for reservoir water management conflict resolution. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 410–419 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A.: On the Design and Construction of Agent-mediated Electronic Institutions, PhD thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2001. No. 14 in IIIA Monograph Series, IIIA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosegrant, M., Gazmuri Schleyer, R.: Reforming Water Allocation Policy Through Markets in Tradable Water Rights: Lessons from Chile, Mexico and California. International Food Policy Research Institute (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin de Santa Olalla, F., Dominguez, A., Ortega, F., Artigao, A., Fabeiro, C.: Bayesian networks in planning a large aquifer in Eastern Mancha, Spain. Environmental Modelling and Software 22, 1089–1100 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schultz, T., Kaufmann-Kohler, G., Langer, D., Bonnet, V.: Online dispute resolution: The state of the art and the issues (2001), http://ssrn.com/abstract=899079 (accessed September 2011)

  21. Sierra, C., Botti, V., Ossowski, S.: Agreement computing. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 25(1), 57–61 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smajgl, A., Heckbert, S., Straton, A.: Simulating impacts of water trading in an institutional perspective. Environmental Modelling and Software 24, 191–201 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thobani, M.: Formal water markets: Why, when and how to introduce tradable water rights. The World Bank Research Observer 12(2), 161–179 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Botti, V., Garrido, A., Giret, A., Noriega, P. (2012). The Role of MAS as a Decision Support Tool in a Water-Rights Market. In: Dechesne, F., Hattori, H., ter Mors, A., Such, J.M., Weyns, D., Dignum, F. (eds) Advanced Agent Technology. AAMAS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27216-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27216-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27215-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27216-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics