Skip to main content

A Case Study in Model Selection for Policy Engineering: Simulating Maritime Customs

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7068))

Abstract

The progress of containers through customs is more often an exercise in negotiation rather than a structured queuing process. As soon as a regulatory process involves negotiation, corruption becomes a factor. Studies by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and other organizations reveal that customs corruption is not easily combated by policy changes. Simulation of potential reform policies in the maritime customs context can provide insights for decision makers. In this paper we present a work-in-progress case study of simulation technique selection for modelling social complexity in the domain of maritime customs. We give evidence (1) to the applicability of a methodological approach that includes evaluation and reasoned selection of a modelling paradigm, and (2) to the applicability of agent-based simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arroyo, J., Hassan, S., Gutiérrez, C., Pavón, J.: Re-thinking simulation: a methodological approach for the application of data mining in agent-based modelling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 16(4), 416–435 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gonzalez de Asis, M.: Reducing corruption at the local level. World Bank (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Axtell, R.: Why agents? On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. Working Paper 17, Brookings Institution (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Baalen, P., Zuidwijk, R., van Nunen, J.: Port inter-organizational information systems: Capabilities to service global supply chains. Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management 2(2–3), 81–241 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bankes, S.C.: Agent-based modeling: A revolution? Proc. National Academy of Sciences 99(Suppl. 3), 7199–7200 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barber, K.S., Liu, T.H., Han, D.C.: Agent-Oriented Design. In: Garijo, F.J., Boman, M. (eds.) MAAMAW 1999. LNCS, vol. 1647, pp. 28–40. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Beirut Container Terminal Consortium: Port of Beirut, http://portdebeyrouth.com

  8. Bergkvist, M., Davidsson, P., Persson, J.A., Ramstedt, L.: A Hybrid Micro-Simulator for Determining the Effects of Governmental Control Policies on Transport Chains. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 236–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cargomaster Group of Companies: Company profile (2006), http://groupage.com

  10. Second food scandal in a week as fake products found. The Daily Star (September 25, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davidsson, P.: Agent based social simulation: A computer science view. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(1), 7 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davidsson, P., Holmgren, J., Kyhlbäck, H., Mengistu, D., Persson, M.: Applications of Agent Based Simulation. In: Antunes, L., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4442, pp. 15–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Jonker, C.M.: Towards Agents for Policy Making. In: David, N., Sichman, J.S. (eds.) MABS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5269, pp. 141–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Dignum, V., Dignum, F., Osinga, S.A., Hofstede, G.J.: Normative, cultural and cognitive aspects of modelling policies. In: Proc. 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 720–732 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duggar, E., Duggar, M.: Corruption, culture and organizational form. Working paper, Social Science Research Network (November 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edmonds, B., Moss, S.: From KISS to KIDS – An ’Anti-Simplistic’ Modelling Approach. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Edmonds, B.: The Use of Models - Making MABS More Informative. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 15–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Finger, M., Schuler, P.: Implementation of Uruguay Round Commitments: The Development Challenge. Blackwell, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gal, Y., Kraus, S., Gelfand, M., Khashan, H., Salmon, E.: An adaptive agent for negotiating with people in different cultures. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Galán, J.M., Izquierdo, L.R., Izquierdo, S.S., Santos, J.I., del Olmo, R., López-Paredes, A., Edmonds, B.: Errors and artefacts in agent-based modelling. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(1:1) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ghorbani, A., Dignum, V., Dijkema, G.: An analysis and design framework for agent-based social simulation. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2011 Workshop on Agent-based Modeling for Policy Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan (May 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.G.: Simulation for the Social Scientist, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hamill, L.: Agent-based modelling: The next 15 years. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 13(4:7) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hammond, R.: Endogenous transition dynamics in corruption: An agent-based computer model. Working Paper 19, Brookings Institution (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hassan, S., Pavón, J., Antunes, L., Gilbert, N.: Injecting data into agent-based simulation. In: Takadama, K., et al. (eds.) Simulating Interacting Agents and Social Phenomena, vol. 7, pp. 173–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henesey, L., Davidsson, P., Persson, J.A.: Agent based simulation architecture for evaluating operational policies in transshipping containers. J. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 18(2), 220–238 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Henesey, L.E., Notteboom, T.E., Davidsson, P.: Agent-based simulation of stakeholders relations: An approach to sustainable port and terminal management. In: Proc. Intl. Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conf., pp. 314–331 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M., Tykhonov, D.: Let’s DANS! an analytic framework of negotiation dynamics and strategies. Multi Agent and Grid Systems (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Computational Modeling of Culture’s Consequences. In: Bosse, T., Geller, A., Jonker, C.M. (eds.) MABS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6532, pp. 136–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoogendoorn, M., Jonker, C., Maanen, P.v., Treur, J.: Agent-based analysis and simulation of meta-reasoning processes in strategic naval planning. Knowledge-Based Systems Journal 22, 589–599 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hors, I.: Fighting corruption in customs administration: What can we learn from recent experiences? OECD Development Centre Working Paper 175 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Klitgaard, R., MacLean-Abaroa, R., Parris, H.L.: Corrupt Cities: A Practical Guide to Cure and Prevention. ICS Press, Oakland (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kunsch, P., Kavathatzopoulos, I., Rauschmayer, F.: Modelling complex ethical decision problems with operations research. Omega 37(6), 1100–1108 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Langseth, P.: Prevention: An effective tool to reduce corruption. In: Proc. ISPAC Conf. on Responding to the Challenge of Corruption (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lebanese Customs Authority: Lebanese customs, www.customs.gov.lb/customs

  37. Leombruni, R., Richiardi, M.: Why are economists sceptical about agent-based simulations? Physica A 355, 103–109 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Lokuge, P., Alahakoon, D.: Improving the adaptability in automated vessel scheduling in container ports using intelligent software agents. European J. Operational Research 177(3), 1985–2015 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Makhoul, J., Harrison, L.: Intercessory wasta and village development in Lebanon. Arab Studies Quarterly 26(3), 25–41 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Marietto, M.B., David, N., Sichman, J.S., Coelho, H.: A classification of paradigmatic models for agent-based social simulation. In: Proc. MABS 2003, pp. 193–208 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Moss, S.: Alternative approaches to the empirical validation of agent-based models. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(1), 5 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Muller, G.: Intermodal Freight Transportation, 4th edn. Eno Transportation Foundation and Intermodal Association of North America, Washington, DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Norling, E., Sonenberg, L., Rönnquist, R.: Enhancing Multi-Agent Based Simulation with Human-Like Decision Making Strategies. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 214–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Pommeranz, A., Visser, W., Broekens, J., Wiggers, P., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.: DUO meta-model for knowledge elicitation and bidding support in NSS. In: Proc. of 11th Group Decision and Negotiation Conference, pp. 120–123 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rawwas, M.Y.A., Patzer, G.L., Vitell, S.J.: A cross-cultural investigation of the ethical values of consumers: The potential effect of war and civil disruption. J. Business Ethics 17, 435–448 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rizk, C.: Hariri launches anti-corruption, public services initiative: Premier calls for modernization of bureaucratic processes. The Daily Star (July 30, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rose-Ackerman, S.: Corruption and government. International Peacekeeping 15(3), 328–343 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Cranefield, S., Purvis, M.A., Purvis, M.K.: Obligation norm identification in agent societies. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 13(4:3) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Seleim, A., Bontis, N.: The relationship between culture and corruption: A cross-national study. J. Intellectual Capital 10(1), 165–184 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sidani, Y., Gardner, W.L.: Work values in the Arab culture: The case of Lebanese workers. The Journal of Social Psychology 140(5), 597–607 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Situngkir, H.: Money-Scape: A generic agent-based model of corruption. Computational Economics Archive 0405008, EconWP (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sycara, K., Dai, T.: Agent reasoning in negotiation. In: The Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer, New York (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Takadama, K., Kawai, T., Koyama, Y.: Micro- and macro-level validation in agent-based simulation. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(2:9) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Terán, O.: Understanding MABS and social simulation: Switching between languages in a hierarchy of levels. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 7(4:5) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  55. The World Bank: Helping countries combat corruption: The role of the World Bank, poverty reduction and economic management network. Tech. rep (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Transparency International: The global corruption report 2009. Tech. rep (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Turan, N., Dai, T., Sycara, K., Weingart, L.: Toward a unified negotiation framework: Leveraging strengths in behavioral and computational communities. In: Proc. IJCAI 1999 Workshop on Modeling Intercultural Collab. and Negotiation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wilkenfeld, J.: Reflections on simulation and experimentation in the study of negotiation. International Negotiation 9(3), 429–439 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harb, H., Srour, F.J., Yorke-Smith, N. (2012). A Case Study in Model Selection for Policy Engineering: Simulating Maritime Customs. In: Dechesne, F., Hattori, H., ter Mors, A., Such, J.M., Weyns, D., Dignum, F. (eds) Advanced Agent Technology. AAMAS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27216-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27216-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27215-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27216-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics