Advertisement

Influential Parameters for Dynamic Analysis of a Hydraulic Control Valve

  • Kyong Uk Yang
  • Jung Gyu Hur
  • Gwang-Jun Kim
  • Dae Hyon Kim
  • Yong-Kab Kim
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 263)

Abstract

A numerical problem that has easily ignored in the dynamic analysis of hydraulic control valves is described, and an analysis of the effects of such problems on numerical modeling is provided. Previous studies have ignored the effects of changes in the flow coefficient in the orifice, the solenoid force along the spool movement in the valve and an ascending tendency of pressure during reach to the steady state. Thus, simulation results obtained in earlier studies have had numerical value errors. To eliminate these problems, this study employed a method to substantiate the nonlinearity of the pressure loss caused by passing between the orifice and port as well as that caused by interaction with the solenoid. Moreover, the movement of the spool and spring expressed using the time-delay-element (TDE). The proposed numerical model has been used in the Bond graph method of a hydraulic control valve and the simulation results have been shown to be accurate. It is known that differences between simulated and experimental results can have a considerable impact on the function of actual systems. The contribution of three factor mentioned in this paper was observed in TDE, Flow coefficient, solenoid order.

Keywords

Hydraulic Control Valve Bond Graphs Numerical Simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borutzky, W.: A Dynamic Bond Graph Model of the Fluid Mechanical Interaction in Spool Valve Control Orifices. In: Bondgraphs for Engineers, pp. 229–236. Elsevier, North Holland (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mukherjee, A., Karmakar, R.: Modelling and Simulation of Engineering Systems through Bondgraph. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dasgupta, K., Chattapadhyay, A., Mondal, S.K.: Selection of fire resistant hydraulic fluids through system modeling and simulation. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory 13(1), 1–20 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suzuki, K., Nakamura, I., Thoma, J.U.: Pressure regulator valve by Bondgraph. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory 7(5-6), 603–611 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karnopp, D., Margolis, D.L., Rosenberg, R.C.: System dynamics: modeling and simulation of mechatronic systems, pp. 12–59, 400–423. Wiley (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dasgupta, K., Karmakar, R.: Dynamic analysis of Pilot operated pressure relief valve. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory 10(1-2), 35–49 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyong Uk Yang
    • 1
  • Jung Gyu Hur
    • 1
  • Gwang-Jun Kim
    • 1
  • Dae Hyon Kim
    • 1
  • Yong-Kab Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Marine TechnologyChonnam National UniversityYeosuKorea
  2. 2.School of Electrical Information EngineeringWonkwang UniversityIksanKorea

Personalised recommendations