Skip to main content

Profit Split, the Future of Transfer Pricing? Arm’s Length Principle and Formulary Apportionment Revisited from a Theoretical and a Practical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: MPI Studies in Tax Law and Public Finance ((MPISTUD,volume 1))

Abstract

This article compares the Profit Split Method (“PSM”), one of the transfer pricing methods for the application of the arm’s length principle, with Formulary Apportionment (“FA”) which is discussed as an alternative to the arm’s length principle as such. In the course of this article, we analyze and compare both approaches, in particular by considering compliance costs, resource allocation, and transition costs. Even though at a first glance FA might be viewed as similar to the PSM (or even more advanced), we demonstrate that there are crucial differences between both approaches. Based on our analysis, we conclude that FA is not an alternative to the application of the PSM. In contrast, we believe that the PSM will gain more and more importance in future. Therefore, we present our proposals to further improve the institutional framework for the application of the arm’s length principle in general and the PSM in particular. Our proposals will help to decrease double taxation, and it will lead to lower compliance costs for the taxpayers as well as for the tax authorities.

We thank Lydia Blaschtschak, Catharina Klepsch, Bernadette Kraus and Luis Fernando Medrano Echalar for their valuable research support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avi-Yonah, R. S., K. A. Clausing and M. C. Durst (2008), Allocating Business Profits for Tax Purposes: A Proposal to Adopt Formulary Profit Split. John M. Olin Center for Law & Economics Working Paper Series, Paper 95, Michigan: Berkeley Electronic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baghadasarayn, D., D. Dreyer Lassen, S. B. Nielsen and P. Raimondos-Møller (2010), True Profit-Shifting, CESifo Conference Working Paper, Munich: CESifo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelsman, E. J. and R. M. W. J. Beetsma (2003), Why Pay More? Corporate Tax Avoidance Through Transfer Pricing in OECD Countries, Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2225 – 2252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., J. B. Jensen, and P. K. Schott (2006), Transfer Pricing by US-based Multinational Firms, NBER Working Paper 12493, NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, M. and J. Slemrod (1995), The Compliance Cost of Taxing Foreign-Source Income: Its Magnitude, Determinants, and Policy Implications, International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 37 – 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucovetsky, S. and A. Haufler (2008), Tax Competition When Firms Chose Their Organizational Form: Should Loopholes For Multinationals Be Closed?, Journal of International Economics, 74, 188 – 201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettner T., N. Riedel, and M. Runkel (2008), Strategic Consolidation under Formula Apportionment, CESifo Working Paper No. 2484, Munich: CESifo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettner, T. and G. Wamser (2007), Internal Debt and Multinationals' Profit Shifting Empirical Evidence from Firm-Level Panel Data, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper 0918, Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buettner, T., M. Overesch, U. Schreiber, and G. Wamser (2009), Taxation and Capital Structure Choice- Evidence from a Panel of German Multinationals, Economics Letters, 105, 309 – 311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausing, K. A. (2003), Tax-Motivated Transfer Pricing and US Intrafirm Trade Prices, Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2207 – 2223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausing, K. A. and R. S. Avi-Yonah (2007), Reforming Corporate Taxation in a Global Economy: A Proposal to Adopt Formulary Apportionment, The Hamilton Project – Discussion Paper 2007 – 08, Washington DC: The Brooking Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. H., D. Kemsley, and M. Lang (1998), Cross-Jurisdictional Income Shifting and Earnings Valuation, Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 209 – 230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2001), Company Taxation in the Internal Market.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. B., P. J. Norbäck and A. Tekin-Koru (2009), The Effect of Tax Treaties on Multinational Firms: New Evidence from Microdata, The World Economy, 32, 77 – 110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2010), German Income Tax Audits – Survey on the experiences of inbound investors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüc-Kunt, A. and H. Huizinga (2001), The Taxation of Domestic and Foreign Banking, Journal of Public Economics, 79, 429 – 453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A., C. F. Foley, and J. R. Hines (2004), A Multinational Perspective on Capital Structure Choice and Internal Capital Markets, Journal of Finance, 59, 2451–2588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A., C. F. Foley, and J. R. Hines (2006), The Demand for Tax Haven Operations, Journal of Public Economics, 90, 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A., C. F. Foley and J. R. Hines (2007), Dividend Policy Inside the Multinational Firm, Financial Management, 36, 5 – 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M. P. (2006), The Impact of Taxation on the Location of Capital, Firms and Profit: A Survey of Empirical Evidence, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper Series 07/02, Said Business School, Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dischinger, M. (2007), Profit Shifting by Multinationals: Indirect Evidence from European Micro Data, Munich Economics Discussion Papers, No. 2007-30, Munich: University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichner, T., and M. Runkel, Corporate Income Taxation in a General Equilibrium Mode”, Journal of Public Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J. and G. Macdonald (2007), The Tax Base For Ccctb: The Role Of Principles, Oxford University Centre For Business Taxation, Working Paper 08/07. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. and J. D. Wilson (1986), An Examination Of Multijurisdictional Corporate Income Taxation Under Formula Apportionment, Econometrica, 54, 1357 – 1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubert, H. and J. Mutti (1991), Taxes, Tariffs, and Transfer Pricing in Multinational Corporate Decision Making, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 285 – 293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubert, H. (1998), Taxes and the Division Of Foreign Operating Income among Royalties, Interest, Dividends and Retained Earnings, Journal of Public Economics, 68, 269 – 290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubert, H. and J. Slemrod (1998), The Effect of Taxes on Investment and Income Shifting to Puerto Rico, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 465 – 373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubert, H. (2003), Intangible Income, Intercompany Transactions, Income Shifting, and the Choice of Location, National Tax Journal, 56, 221 – 242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. G. (1993), The Impact of U.S. Tax Law Revision on Multinational Corporations’ Capital Location and Income-Shifting Decisions, Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 111 – 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D., R. Morck, J. Slemrod, and B. Yeung (1993), Income Shifting in U.S. Multinational Corporations, in: Giovannini, A., R. G. Hubbard and J. Slemrod (eds.), Studies in International Taxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellerstein, W. and C. E. McLure (2004), The European Comission’s Report on Income Taxation: What the EU can learn from the Experience of the US States, International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 199 – 220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. R. (1999), Lessons from behavioral responses to international taxation, National Tax Journal, 52, 304 – 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. R. (2003), Sensible Tax Policies in Open Economies. Journal of the Statistical and Social Inquiry Society of Ireland, 32, 1 – 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. R. (2010), Testimony to the Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives in July 22, 2010. Hearing on “Transfer Pricing Issues in the Global Economy”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. R., and E. Rice (1994), Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 149 – 182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, H. and L. Laeven (2008), International Profit Shifting Within Multinationals: A Multi-Country Perspective, Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1164 – 1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, K., M. Lang and M. Wolfson (1993), Geographic Income Shifting by Multinational Corporations in Response to Tax Rate Changes, Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 141 – 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keuschnigg, C. and M. P. Deveureux (2009), The Distorting Arm’s Length Principle, University of St. Gallen Discussion Paper No. 2009-20, St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. and R. Schmidtke (2009), Transfer Pricing Regulations and Business Relocations, in: Klein, J., Three Essays in Industrial Organization Competition Policy and Regulation. Ph.D. Thesis, Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerov, M. (2001), The “Single Sales Factor” Formula for State Corporate Taxes: a Boon to Economic Development or a Costly Giveaway?, State Tax Notes, 20, 1775 – 1817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, J. and M. Smart (2004), Income Shifting, Investment, and Tax Competition: Theory and Empirical Evidence from Provincial Taxation in Canada, Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1149 – 1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004), Are the Current Rules for Taxing Business Profits Appropriate for E-Commerce? – Final Report, Centre for Tax and Policy Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010), OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Overesch, M. and U. Schreiber (2008), R&D Intensities, International Profit Shifting, and Investment Decisions. University Of Mannheim Discussion Paper, Mannheim: University Of Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overesch, M. (2006), Transfer Pricing of Intrafirm Sales as a Profit Shifting Channel – Evidence from German Firm Data, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW) Discussion Paper No. 06-84, Mannheim: ZEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roin, J. (2007), Can the Income Tax be Saved? The Promise and Pitfalls of Unitary Formulary Apportionment, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 170, Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimondos-Møller, P. and K. Scharf (2002), Transfer Pricing Rules and Competing Governments, Oxford Economic Papers 54, 230 – 246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J. and V. Venkatesh (2002), The Income Tax Compliance Costs of Large and Mid-Sized Businesses. Report to the Internal Revenue Service Large and Mid-Size Business Division. Office of Tax Policy Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. A. (2010), Testimony to the Committee on Ways on Means, United States House of Representatives in July 22, 2010. Hearing on “Transfer Pricing Issues in the Global Economy”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöwhase S. (2005), Taxes and Multinational Enterprises in the EU: Location Decisions and Income Shifting. Ph.D. Thesis, Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Treasury (2007): Report to the Congress on Earnings Stripping, Transfer Pricing and U.S. Income Tax Treaties.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2008): U.S. Multinational Corporations. Effective Tax Rates Are Correlated with Where Income Is Reported. Report to the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkering, B. and J. De Haan (2001), Tax ratios: A critical survey, OECD Tax Policy Studies, No. 5., Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weichenrieder, J. A. (2009), Profit Shifting in the EU: Evidence from Germany, International Tax and Public Finance, 16, 281 – 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kroppen, HK., Dawid, R., Schmidtke, R. (2012). Profit Split, the Future of Transfer Pricing? Arm’s Length Principle and Formulary Apportionment Revisited from a Theoretical and a Practical Perspective. In: Schön, W., Konrad, K. (eds) Fundamentals of International Transfer Pricing in Law and Economics. MPI Studies in Tax Law and Public Finance, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25980-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics