Advertisement

The Choice between Verbal Anaphors in Discourse

  • Philip Miller
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7099)

Abstract

This paper investigates the conditions of choice in discourse between various verbal anaphors in English, namely Post-Auxiliary Ellipsis with auxiliary do; do so; and do it/this/that. On the basis of an extensive corpus survey, the following factors are shown to be relevant: (i) register, (ii) the presence or absence of an accessible polar alternative, (iii) whether the sentence containing the anaphor refers to the same state of affairs as that which contains the antecedent, (iv) the presence of a non contrastive adjunct, (v) the identity of the subject of the anaphor and its antecedent, (vi) the saliency of the antecedent.

Keywords

Anaphora Verb Phrase Ellipsis do so do it do this do that discourse accessibility saliency register verbal anaphors verbal antecedent accessibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bos, J., Spenader, J.: An annotated corpus for the analysis of VP ellipsis. Language Resources and Evaluation (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cornish, F.: Anaphora, discourse, and understanding: evidence from English and French. Oxford University Press (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Culicover, P.W., Jackendoff, R.: Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N., Zacharski, R.: Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2), 274–307 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hankamer, J., Sag, I.: Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391–428 (1976)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hardt, D.: Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, processing. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, IRCS report 93-23 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Houser, M.J.: The Syntax and Semantics of do so Anaphora. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huddleston, R., Pullum, G.K.: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kehler, A.: Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. CSLI Publications (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kertz, L.: Ellipsis Reconsidered. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of California at San Diego (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lakoff, G., Ross, J.R.: Why you can’t do so into the sink. In: McCawley, J.D. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics. Notes from the Linguistic Underground, vol. 7. Academic Press (1976)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Michiels, A.: A note on the relation between agent and stativity. Neophilologus Groningen 62(2), 172–177 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller, P., Pullum, G.K.: Exophoric verb phrase ellipsis (In preparation)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Université Paris DiderotParisFrance

Personalised recommendations