Skip to main content

Multiobjective Simulated Annealing Based Approach for Feature Selection in Anaphora Resolution

  • Conference paper
Anaphora Processing and Applications (DAARC 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7099))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we propose a multiobjective simulated annealing based technique for anaphora resolution. There is no generally accepted metric for measuring the performance of anaphora resolution systems, and the existing metrics–MUC, B3 , CEAF, Blanc, among others–tend to reward significantly different behaviors. Systems optimized according to one metric tend to perform poorly with respect to other ones, making it very difficult to compare anaphora resolution systems, as clearly shown by the results of the SEMEVAL 2010 Task 1 on the Multilingual Coreference Resolution. One solution would be to find a single completely satisfactory metric, but its not clear whether this is possible and at any rate it is not going to happen any time soon. An alternative is to optimize models according to multiple metrics simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a multiobjective simulated annealing based technique to solve the feature selection problem of anaphora resolution by optimizing multiple objective functions. Experimental results show that the proposed approach performs superior in comparison to the previously developed multiobjective genetic algorithm based feature selection technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagga, A., Baldwin, B.: Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. In: LREC Workshop on Linguistic Coreference, pp. 563–566 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bandyopadhyay, S., Saha, S., Maulik, U., Deb, K.: A simulated annealing based multi-objective optimization algorithm: AMOSA. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 12(3), 269–283 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bengtson, E., Roth, D.: Understanding the value of features for coreference resolution. In: EMNLP (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K.: Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., England (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 181–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doddington, G., Mitchell, A., Przybocki, M., Ramshaw, L., Strassell, S., Weischedel, R.: The automatic content extraction (ACE) program-tasks, data, and evaluation. In: LREC (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoste, V.: Optimization Issues in Machine Learning of Coreference Resolution. Ph.D. thesis, Antwerp University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Vecchi, M.P.: Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–680 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, X.: On coreference resolution performance metrics. In: NAACL / EMNLP, Van-couver (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbloth, M.N., Teller, A.H., Teller, E.: Equation of state calculation by fast computing machines. J. Chemical Physics 21(6), 1087–1092 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Munson, A., Cardie, C., Caruana, R.: Optimizing to arbitrary NLP metrics using ensembleselection. In: HLT/EMNLP, pp. 539–546 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ng, V., Cardie, C.: Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In: ACL, pp. 104–111 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poon, H., Domingos, P.: Joint unsupervised coreference resolution with Markov logic. In: EMNLP (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pradhan, S., Marcus, M., Palmer, M., Ramshaw, L., Weischedel, R., Xue, N.: Conll-2011:Shared task on modeling unrestricted coreference in ontonotes, Portland, Oregon, USA, June23-24 (2011), http://www.cnts.ua.ac.be/conll/

  15. Recasens, M., Hovy, E.: A Deeper Look into Features for Coreference Resolution. In: Lalitha Devi, S., Branco, A., Mitkov, R. (eds.) DAARC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5847, pp. 29–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Recasens, M., Hovy, E.: Blanc: Implementing the rand index for coreference evaluation. Natural Language Engineering (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Recasens, M., Márquez, L., Sapena, E., Mart, M.A., Taul, M., Hoste, V., Poesio, M., Ver-rsley, Y.: Semeval-2010 task 1: Coreference resolution in multiple languages. In: SE-MEVAL 2010, Uppsala (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Saha, S., Ekbal, A., Uryupina, O., Poesio, M.: Single and multi-objective optimization forfeature selection in anaphora resolution. In: IJCNLP (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Soon, W.M., Ng, H.T., Lim, D.C.Y.: A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics 27(4), 521–544 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uryupina, O.: Knowledge Acquisition for Coreference Resolution. Ph.D. thesis, University of the Saarland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Uryupina, O.: Corry: a system for coreference resolution. In: SemEval (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Veldhuizen, D.V., Lamont, G.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evolutionary Computations 2, 125–1473 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Versley, Y., Ponzetto, S.P., Poesio, M., Eidelman, V., Jern, A., Smith, J., Yang, X., Moschitti, A.: BART: a modular toolkit for coreference resolution. In: ACL/HLT, pp. 9–12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vilain, M., Burger, J., Aberdeen, J., Connolly, D., Hirschman, L.: A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. MUC 6, 45–52 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, S., Ng, H.T.: Maximum metric score training for coreference resolution. In: COLING 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ekbal, A., Saha, S., Uryupina, O., Poesio, M. (2011). Multiobjective Simulated Annealing Based Approach for Feature Selection in Anaphora Resolution. In: Hendrickx, I., Lalitha Devi, S., Branco, A., Mitkov, R. (eds) Anaphora Processing and Applications. DAARC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7099. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25917-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25917-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25916-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25917-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics