Advertisement

Clitics in Spanish Agrammatic Aphasia: A Study of the Production of Unaccusative, Reflexive and Object Clitics

  • Sara Sanchez–Alonso
  • Silvia Martinez–Ferreriro
  • Roelien Bastiaanse
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7099)

Abstract

Cross-linguistic research on language pathologies has shown that production of clitic pronominals is problematic for patients with aphasia. The current contribution provides the first data on production of the unaccusative/middle clitic SE and considers how pronominal interpretation influences verb production. Two morphologically similar constructions are studied: unaccusative and refexive sentences. Results are compared with production of direct object clitics. The data show that transitive sentences with DO clitics are harder to produce than unaccusative, reflexive and transitive (will full DPs in object position) constructions. These findings are explained by the increase in difficulty that processing of DO clitics involves: discourse linking and clitic placement. Finally, reflexive verbs were not more difficult to produce than transitive sentences. The current study therefore supports the analysis of reflexives as structurally similar to unergative entries.

Keywords

Spanish agrammatism clitic unaccusative reflexive sentence production 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avrutin, S.: Development of the syntax-discourse interface. Kluwer, Boston (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avrutin, S.: Weak syntax. In: Grodzinsky, Y., Amunts, K. (eds.) Broca’s Region, pp. 49–62. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bastiaanse, R., Bamyaci, E., Hsu, C.J., Lee, T., Duman, Y., Thompson, C.K.: Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study, pp. 652–673 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burkhardt, P.: The Syntax-Discourse Interface: Representing and Interpreting Dependency. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burzio, L.: Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Reidel, Dordrecht (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chinellato, P.: Disturbi di sintassi nell’afasia fluente: un’analisi linguistica dell’agrammatismo italiano e dialettale. PhD thesis, University of Padova (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chomsky, N.: Lectures on government and binding. Foris Publications, Dordrecht (1981)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drijbooms, E., Bastiaanse, R.: Production of pronouns and reflexives by agrammatic French-Dutch bilingual speakers. Paper Presented at Science of Aphasia XII, Barcelona, September 1-5 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grimshaw, J.: On the lexical representation of Romance reflexive clitics. In: Bresnan, J. (ed.) The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 87–146. MIT Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heim, I.: The Semantics of Definitie and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massacusetss, Amherst (1982)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kayne, R.: French syntax: The transformational cycle. MIT Press, Cambridge (1975)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lonzi, L., Luzzatti, C.: Relevance of adverb distribution for the analysis of sentence representation in agrammatic patients. Brain and Language 45, 306–317 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martinez Ferreiro, S.: Title. PhD Thesis, Autonomous University of Barcelona (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miceli, G., Mazzucchi, A.: Agrammatism in Italian: Two case studies. In: Menn, L., Obler, L. (eds.) Agrammatic Aphasia: a Cross Linguistic Narrative Sourcebook, pp. 717–757. Benjamin, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piñango, M.M., Burkhardt, P.: Pronominal Interpretation and the Syntax-Discourse Interface: Real-time Comprehension and Neurological Properties. In: Branco, A., McEnery, T., Mitkov, R. (eds.) Anaphora Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modelling, pp. 221–238. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reinhart, T.: The Theta system: syntactic realization of verbal concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics, Utrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reinhart, T.: Syntactic Effects of Lexical Operations: Reflexives and UiL. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics, Utrecht (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reinhart, T., Siloni, T.: Against the Unaccusative Analysis of reflexives. In: Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., Everaert, M. (eds.) The Unaccusativity Puzzle. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reinhart, T.: Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora question. Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47–88 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rossi, E.: Clitic production in Italian agrammatism. PhD thesis, University of Groningen (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanchez Alonso, S., Martinez Ferreiro, S., Bastiaanse, R.: Production of verbs with alternating transitivity in Spanish agrammatic speakers (in press)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stavrakaki, S., Kouvava, S.: Functional categories in agrammatism: Evidence from Greek. Brain and Language 86, 129–141 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vasi, N., Avrutin, S., Ruigendijk, E.: Ruigendijk: Interpretation of pronouns in VP-ellipsis constructions in Dutch Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language 96(2), 191–206 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Sanchez–Alonso
    • 1
  • Silvia Martinez–Ferreriro
    • 2
  • Roelien Bastiaanse
    • 3
  1. 1.Yale UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Univ Pompeu FabraSpain
  3. 3.Univ of GroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations