Skip to main content

Exploring the Lexical and Acoustic Consequences of Referential Predictability

  • Conference paper
Book cover Anaphora Processing and Applications (DAARC 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7099))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Findings from various domains suggest that predictability is an important component of language processing. We report psycholinguistic research suggesting that predictability also influences referential processing, in the form of reduced acoustic durations for predictable referents. However, we do not find evidence that predictability directly influences likelihood of pronominalization, contrary to some prior claims. Instead, our data indicate that the use and interpretation of pronouns is influenced by thematic role, independently of which referent is most predictable, i.e., most likely to be mentioned next. We suggest that likelihood-of-mention is influenced by the mapping between syntactic and thematic roles. Our results highlight the benefits of exploring both lexical and acoustic aspects of referential production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, J.: Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 23, 495–527 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, J.: The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation. Discourse Processes 31(2), 137–162 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bell, A., et al.: Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. J. Acoustic Society of America. 113, 1001–1024 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fukumura, K., van Gompel, R.: Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do people take into account likelihood of reference? J. Memory and Language 62, 52–66 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Givón, T.: Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. Lawrence Erlbaum (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grimshaw, J.: Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hale, J.: A Probabilistic early parser as a Psycholinguistic Model. In: NACCL, vol. 2, pp. 159–166 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hume, E., Mailhot, F.: The role of entropy and surprisal in phonologization and language change. In: Yu, A. (ed.) Origins of Sound Patterns, University Press (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., Raymond, W.: Probabilistic relations between words. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, pp. 229–254. John Benjamins (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaiser, E.: Investigating the Consequences of Focus on the Production and Comprehension of Referring Expressions. J. International Review of Pragmatics 2, 266–297 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaiser, E., Holsinger, E., Li, D.: Who next? Consequences of syntax-semantics mismatches for likelihood of mention. In: Human Sentence, Stanford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kehler, A.: Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. CSLI Publications (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kehler, A., Kertz, L., Rohde, H., Elman, J.: Coherence and coreference revisited. J. Semantics 25, 1–44 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kertz, L., Kehler, A., Elman, J.: Evaluating a Coherence-Based Model of Pronoun Interpretation. In: Workshop on Ambiguity in Anaphora, Malaga, Spain (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levy, R.: Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106, 1126–1177 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rohde, H.: Coherence-Driven Effects in Sentence and Discourse Processing. Ph.D., UC San Diego (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stevenson, R., Crawley, R., Kleinman, D.: Thematic roles, focusing and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes 9, 519–548 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaiser, E., Li, D.CH., Holsinger, E. (2011). Exploring the Lexical and Acoustic Consequences of Referential Predictability. In: Hendrickx, I., Lalitha Devi, S., Branco, A., Mitkov, R. (eds) Anaphora Processing and Applications. DAARC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7099. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25917-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25917-3_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25916-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25917-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics