Advertisement

Semantic and Structural Constraints on the Resolution of Ambiguous Personal Pronouns - A Psycholinguistic Study

  • Miriam Ellert
  • Anke Holler
Conference paper
  • 560 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7099)

Abstract

We present a series of on- and off-line experiments to investigate the influence of semantic and structural constraints on the resolution of subject pronouns in German, thereby revealing inconsistencies of previous studies. On the basis of factors like (in-)animacy, the presence/absence of different types of connectors and clausal structure (coordination versus subordination) we show in which way structural and semantic information interact in inter- and intra-sentential anaphor resolution.

Keywords

pronoun resolution animacy connectives discourse processing visual world eye-tracking referent assignment sentence completion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahrenholz, B.: Verweise mit Demonstrativa Im Gesprochenen Deutsch. In: Grammatik, Zweitspracherwerb und Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Walter De Gruyter, Berlin (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ariel, M.: Accessing NP antecedents. Routledge, London (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asher, N., Vieu, L.: Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua 115, 591–610 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., Bates, D.M.: Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Memory and Language 59, 390–412 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barr, D.J.: Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. J. Memory and Language 59, 457–474 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bates, D.M., Sarkar,D.: lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, version 0.999375-27 (2007), http://www.r-project.org
  8. 8.
    Bittner, D.: Influence of animacy and grammatical role on production and comprehension of intersentential pronouns in German L1-acquisition1. Paper Presented at the Conference on Intersentential Pronominal Reference in Child and Adult Language (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bosch, P., Umbach, C.: Reference determination for demonstrative pronouns. Paper Presented at the Conference on Intersentential Pronominal Reference in Child and Adult Language (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouma, G., Hopp, H.: Coreference Preferences for Personal Pronouns in German. Paper Presented at the Conference on Intersentential Pronominal Reference in Child and Adult Language (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carroll, M., Rodeutscher, A., Lambert, M., Van Stutterheim, C.: Subordination in narratives and macrostructural planning: A comparative point of view. In: Fabricius-Hansen, C., Ramm, W. (eds.) ‘Subordination’ Versus ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text, pp. 161–184. John Benjamins (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clifton Jr., C., Traxler, M.J., Mohamed, M.T., Williams, R.S., Morris, R.K., Rayner, K.: The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. J. Memory and Language 49, 317–334 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cooper, R.M.: The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 6, 84–107 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crawley, R., Stevenson, R., Kleinman, D.: The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. J. Psycholinguistic Research 4, 245–264 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frederiksen, J.: Understanding anaphora: Rules used by readers in assigning pronominal referents. Discourse Processes 4, 323–347 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fukumura, K., Van Gompel, R.P.G.: The effects of animacy in the choice of referring expressions. In: Language and Cognitive Processes, October 13 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gernsbacher, M.A.: Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition 32, 99–156 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grober, E.H., Beardsley, W., Caramazza, A.: Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition 6, 117–133 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N., Zacharski, R.: Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes 69, 274–307 (1993)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., Scheepers, C., Colonna, S., Schimke, S., Pynte, J.: Language specific preferences in anaphor resolution: Exposure or Gricean maxims? In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland, USA (August 2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Igoa, J.M.: The relationship between conceptualization and formulation processes in sentence production: some evidence from Spanish. In: Carreiras, M., Garca-Albea, J.E., Sebastin-Galls, N. (eds.) Language Processing in Spanish, pp. 305–351. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kehler, A.: Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. CSLI Publications, Standford (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lambrecht, K.: Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents, Cambridge UK (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levinson, S.C.: Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. J. Linguistics 27, 107–161 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mak, W.M., Vonk, W., Schriefers, H.: The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. J. Memory and Language 47, 50–68 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miltsakaki, E.: The syntax-discourse interface: Effects of the main-subordinate distinction on attention structure. University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Polanyi, L.: A formal model of the structure of discourse. J. Pragmatics 12, 601–638 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prat-Sala, M., Branigan, H.P.: Discourse Constraints on Syntactic Processing in Language Production: A Cross-linguistic Study in English and Spanish. J. Memory and Language 42, 168–182 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., Eberhard, K.M., Sedivy, J.C.: Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268(5217), 1632–1634 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Traxler, M.J., Morris, R.K., Seely, R.E.: Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. J. Memory and Language 47, 69–90 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M.K., Garnsey, S.: Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. J. Memory and Language 33, 285–318 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Nice, K.Y., Dietrich, R.: Task-sensitivity of animacy effects: Evidence from German picture descriptions. Linguistics 41(5), 825–849 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilson, F.: Processing at the syntax-discourse interface in second language acquisition. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miriam Ellert
    • 1
  • Anke Holler
    • 1
  1. 1.Courant Research Centre “Text Structures”University of GöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations