Abstract
Industry clusters (ICs) have attracted much attention in the recent past. Besides the ever-growing academic interest, ICs have become primary targets of development policy, similarly to foreign direct investment (FDI) attraction and the development of local linkages (e.g., supplier networks) of foreign investment enterprises (FIEs). Both structures, ICs and widespread supplier networks, have common features. Most importantly, both need a sufficient number of potential collaborators. Both can be developed most successfully in regions where economic activity is vivid and enterprising and cooperation has traditions. It is therefore of special interest to learn what should and could be the relationship between the two cooperation systems, what are their common features, and what are the differences. These are the issues examined in this chapter, both from theoretical and empirical points of view, this latter based on the example of the Hungarian and other CEE economies’ experience and with special regard to the automotive and ICT sectors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Michael Porter’s original definition for clusters is as follows: “Clusters are geographic concentrations of interconnected companies, specialized suppliers and service providers, firms in related industries, and associated institutions (for example universities, standards agencies, and trade associations) in particular fields that compete but also co-operate” Porter 1990, (1998). The main aim of this cooperation is enhancing competitiveness of regions and actors in the region.
- 3.
- 4.
One main precondition of successful cluster operation is the presence of a fairly large and diverse pool of economic agents specializing on similar or supportive activities. The sufficiently large, specialized local economic activity is crucial for knowledge generation and transfer, for the internal stability of cluster organizations, for the “visibility” of clusters, and for the self-sustaining development of cluster activities. For more general descriptions and about various interpretations of the cluster concept, see Porter (1998); Sölvell et al. (2003); ICEG (2007); Sölvell (2008); EC (2008b); Szanyi (2008b).
- 5.
Sölvell et al. (2003) run the first major questionnaire-based empirical survey on clusters worldwide. Using the survey results, they described a typical or best practice cluster type: the most common appearance of clusters. Because of overrepresentation of clusters from developed market economies, this model, which they called “dynamic cluster,” reflected basically those characteristics, cooperation forms, and structures that were found typical in more-developed economies. Later research (e.g., Ketels and Sölvell 2005; Ketels et al. 2006) revealed the fact that in emerging market economies or developing countries, clusters may substantially differ concerning their focus of activity and working models.
- 6.
See for details: ICEG (2006).
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
For a thorough description of the traded cluster category, see http://data.isc.hbs.edu/isc/index.jsp.
- 10.
The design of the locational quotient is similar to Bela Balassa’s RCA measure (revealed comparative advantage). It expresses the relative weight of one single sector in a region to the total weight of the region, compared to either the national economy or a larger geographical area. The calculation is as follows:
\( {\hbox{L}}{{\hbox{Q}}_{{ij}}} = \frac{{{e_{{ij}}}/{E_i}}}{{{e_j}/E}} = \frac{{{s_{{ij}}}}}{{{x_j}}}, \) where
e ij : number of employees in area j in branch i,
e j : the total number of employees in area j,
E i : number of employees in branch i in the whole country (spatial unit of comparison), and
E: total number of employees in the whole country (spatial unit of comparison), and therefore
S ij : shows the share of area j in total employment of branch i, and
x j : shows the share of area j in total employment.
- 11.
The database allowed even deeper NUTS-4 level calculations.
- 12.
We also evaluated the branch-comitat pairs at a lower 30% level.
- 13.
We must notice here again that spatial concentration is just one important condition of cluster formation. Hence, even if we call the observed concentrations clusters or potential clusters, it does by no means mean that there is an actual cluster organization present. HBS documents, as well as the European Cluster Observatory, also uses the term “cluster” for spatial activity concentrations.
- 14.
For car industry and the role of PANAC, and the Hungarian automotive cluster, see Grosz (2006).
- 15.
References
Antalóczy K., M. Sass (2001) “Greenfield investments in Hungary.” Transnational Corporations, 2001/3. pp. 39.-60.
CLOE (2006) “Cluster Management Guide – Guidelines for the Cluster Development and Management of Cluster Initiatives. Clusters Linked over Europe Program” http://www.clusterforum.org
Cluster Observatory (2009) Database: http://www.clusterobservatory.eu
ECOTEC (2003) “A Practical Guide to Cluster Development. A report to the Department of Trade and Industry and the English RDAs UK”, London: Department of Trade and Industry.
European Commission (2003) Final report of the Export Group on Enterprise Clusters and Networks. Enterprise Directorate General, Luxemburg.
Europe Cluster Observatory (2007) The European Cluster Memorandum. Promoting European Innovation through Clusters. Centre for Strategy and Competitiveness, EUROPE CLUSTER OBSERVATORY.
European Commission (2008a) Towards world-class clusters in the European Union: Implementing the broad-based innovation strategy. (Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 17 October 2008).
European Commission (2008b) The concept of clusters and cluster policies and their role for competitiveness and innovation: Main statistical results and lessons learned. (Commission staff working document accompanying the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 20 October, 2008).
Gecse, G. (2004) Hungarian Budding Clusters. Department for Innovation and Environmental Protection, Ministry of Economy and Transport.
Grosz, A. (2006) A PANAC Pannon Autóipari Klaszter szellemi tőke jelentése. RICARDA program, Nyugat-dunántúli Regionális Fejlesztési Ügynökség Kht.
Hunya G. (2001) Uneven competitiveness of industries in the wake of foreign penetration of advanced economies in transition. Transnational Corporations, Vol. 10., No. 2., August, 35–66.
ICEG (2006) Több, mint beszállítók? A hálózatosodás lehetőségei a háztartásigép-gyártásban Észak-Alföldön és Észak-Magyarországon. Munkafüzet 17. (SASS M. CZAKÓ V. BAKÁCS A. szerzők).
ICEG (2007) CEE-ClusterNetwork Summary of the main research results. July 2. (ENDRÉSZ K. szerk.).
Ketels, C.; Sölvell, Ö. (2005) “Clusters in the EU 10 new member countries” Europe INNOVA
Ketels, C.; Lindquist, G.; Sölvell, Ö. (2006) Cluster Initiatives in Developing and Transition Economies. Center for Strategy and Competitiveness, Stockholm.
Ketels, C. (2004) European Clusters, Hagbarth Publications.
Marshall, A. (1890) Principles of Economics. London, Macmillan.
Pavlinek, P.; Janak, L. (2007) Regional Restructuring of the Skoda Auto Supplier Network in the Czech Republic. European Urban and Regional Studies 14(2) pp. 133–155.
Porter M. (2003) “The economic performance of regions” Regional Studies Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 549–578.
Porter M. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press
Porter M. (1998) On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Pouder W.; St. John, W (1996) “Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 1192–1225.
Ravn, L.; Petersen, J.W. (2005) Cluster Development in Hungary. A study of the possibilities for the automotive industry and the wood and furniture industry to enhance regional sustainable development. Department of Environment, Technology and Social Studies, Roskilde University.
Sass M. (2003) Competitiveness and Economic Policies Related to FDI. Finance Ministry Research Paper. September.
Sass, M. (2008) Outsourcing business services: the emergence of NMS. ICEG European Center, News of the Month, March 2008, p. 4–6.
Sass M.; Szanyi M. (2004) Is crowding in a real option? The development of supplier linkages of local firms to multinational corporations. in: Internationales Management in den Märkten Mittel- und Osteuropas. Pp.367-390. Rainer Hampp Verlag München – Mering.
Sass, M.; Szanyi,M.; Csizmadia, P.; Illéssy, M.; Iwasaki, I.; Makó CS. (2009) Clusters and the Development of Supplier Networks for Transnational Companies. IWE Working Paper No. 187 March.
Saxenian, A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Soviar, J. (2009) Cluster Initiatives in Zilina Region (Slovak Republic). Ekonomika ir Vadyba 2009, 14, pp. 528–534.
Sölvell, Ö.; Lindquist, G.; Ketels, C. (2003), The Cluster Initiative Greenbook Stockholm: Ivory Tower AB.
Sölvell, Ö. (2008) Clusters. Balancing Evolutionary and Constructive Forces. Stockholm: Ivory Tower AB.
Szalavetz A. (2001) Ipari körzetek – a regionális fejlesztés új egységei. Külgazdaság 12.sz.
Szalavetz A. (2005) Structural Change – Structural Competitiveness. IWE Working Paper No. 155 April.
Szanyi M. (2001) Policy Consequence of FDI, Linkage Promotion Opportunities in Hungary. In Expert Seminar “Finance for development: Enhancing the benefits of FDI and Improving the Flow of Corporate Finance in the Transition Economies” UNECE Geneva http://www.unece.org/ead/ffd_new.htm
Szanyi M. (2003) An FDI-based development Model for Hungary – New Challenges? IWE Working Paper no. 141 December.
Szanyi M. (2008a) A versenyképesség javítása együttműködéssel: Regionális klaszterek. Napvilág Kiadó, Budapest.
Szanyi M. (2008b) Cluster Concept and practice in Hungary. In: Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Growth and labour market Performance: Empirical Evidence from the New EU Countries. BIRSAN M. – HUNYA G. – Siedschlag I. (eds) Editura Fundatiei pentru Studii Europene Cluj.
Szanyi, M.; Iwasaki, I.; Csizmadia, P.; Illéssy, M.; Makó, CS. (2009) A gazdasági tevékenység sűrűsödési pontjainak (klaszterek) vizsgálata. (Analysis of economic activities’ geographical density (clusters)) Statisztikai Szemle 87. évf. 9. szám, 921–936.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szanyi, M. (2012). Industrial Clusters: Concepts and Empirical Evidence from East-Central Europe. In: Welfens, P. (eds) Clusters in Automotive and Information & Communication Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25816-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25816-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25815-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25816-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)