Advertisement

Supply Chain Risk Management: Resilience and Business Continuity

  • Mauricio F. Blos
  • Hui Ming Wee
  • Wen-Hsiung Yang
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 33)

Abstract

The last decade has been extraordinary, as it is marked by a succession of disasters. The risks in supply chain are critical because of increasing outsourcing, off-shoring, product variety, lean manufacturing and supply chain security. Moreover, organizations and societies are at a greater risk of system failure because of the massive interdependency throughout the global supply chains. Due to those facts, continuity is the main concern of any supplier. This chapter gives an overview on how a better supply chain decision making with risk can be made so as to achieve supply chain resilience and business continuity.

Keywords

Supply Chain Business Process Business Function Entire Supply Chain Supply Chain Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hertz, D., Thomas, H.: Risk Analysis and its Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chischester (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Survey Report BCI, Experience of Supply Chain Disruption (2009) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO/DIS 31000: Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines on Implementation (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christopher, M., Peck, H.: Building the Resilient Supply Chain. International Journal of Logistics Management 15(2), 1 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Craighead, C.W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M.J., Handfield, R.B.: The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities. Decision Sciences 38(1), 131 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheffi, Y., Rice, J.B.: A Supply Chain View of the Resilient Enterprise. MIT Sloan Management Review 47(1), 41 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Falasca, M., Zobel, C.W., Cook, D.: A Decision Support Framework to As-sess Supply Chain Resilience. In: Proceedings of the 5th International ISCRAM Conference, pp. 596–605 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomlin, B.: On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks. Management Science 52(5), 639 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lodree Jr., E.J., Taskin, S.: An insurance risk management framework for disaster relief and supply chain disruption inventory planning. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–11 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, H.Y., Chou, Y.C., Chang, S.: A dynamic system model for proactive control of dynamic events in full-load states of manufacturing chains. International Journal of Production Research 1, 1–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Datta, P.P., Christopher, M., Allen, P.: Agent-based modelling of complex production/distribution systems to improve resilience. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 10(3), 187–203 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang, C.S.: Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics 103(2), 451–488 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleindorfer, P.R., Saad, G.H.: Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains. Production and Operations Management 14(1), 53–68 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sheffi, Y.: Building a resilient supply Chain. Harvard Business Review Supply Chain Strategy 1(8), 1 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peck, H.: Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: an integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 35(3/4), 210 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO 28002: Resilience in the Supply Chain: requirements with Guidance for Use (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hopking, K.: Value opportunity three: improving the ability to fulfill demand. Business Week (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    George, A.S.: Li and Fung: beyond “filling in the mosaic”. Harvard Business School, case 9-398-092 (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McFarlan, W.: Li and Fung (A): Internet issues. Harvard Business School, case 9-301-009 (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Veverka, M.: A DRAM shame, Barron’s, October 15, p. 15 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martha, J., Subbakrishna, S.: Targeting a just-in-case supply chain for the inevitable next disaster. In: Supply Chain Mgmnt Rev. (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    BS 25999: Business Continuity Management (BCM) Standard (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parier, M., Zawada, B.: Risky Business – Failing to Assess Supply Chain Continuity. In: A Study Conducted by the Council of Logistics Management States (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    CCTA, An introduction to business continuity management. HMSO, London (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barnes, James, C.: A guide to Business Continuity Planning. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hiles, A., Barnes, P. (eds.): The Definitive Handbook of Business Continuity Management. J. Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Starr, R., Newfrock, J., Delurey, M.: Enterprise resilience: managing risk in the networked economy. Strategy and Business 30, 73–79 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith, D.J. (ed.): Business continuity management: Good practice guidelines. Business Continuity Institute, Caversham (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Blos, M.F., Wee, H.M., Yang, J.: Analysing the external supply chain risk driver competitiveness: A risk mitigation framework and business continuity Plan. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning 4, 368–374 (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brindley, C.: Supply Chain Risk. Ashgate Publishing Company (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lave, L.: Health and Safety Risk Analyses: Information for Better Decisions. Science 236, 291–295 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grahan, J.D., Rhomberg, L.: How Risks are Identified and Assessed (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    IAEA: Guidelines for Integrated Risk Assessment and Management in Large Industrial Areas (1995)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stricaff, R.S.: Safety Risk Analysis and Process Safety Managesment: Principles and Practices (1995)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hattis, D.: The conception of variability in risk analyses: Developments since 1980 (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Olin, S., Farland, W., Park, C., Rhomberg, L., Scheuplein, R., Starr, T., Wilson, J.: Low Dose Extrapolation of Cancer Risks: Issues and Perspectives (1995)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    US-EPA Environmental Protection Agency: Exposure Factors Handbook (1997)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    IEC: Guidelines for Risk Analysis of Technological Systems, Report IEC-CD (Sec) 381 issued by the Technical Committee QMS/23. (European Community: Brussels) (1993) Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kolluru, R.V.: Risk Assessment and Management: A Unified Approach, pp. 1.3–1.41. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauricio F. Blos
    • 1
  • Hui Ming Wee
    • 2
  • Wen-Hsiung Yang
    • 3
  1. 1.SONY do Brasil Ltda, Supply Chain SolutionsManausBrasil
  2. 2.Industrial and Systems Engineering DepartmentChung Yuan Christian UniversityChungliTaiwan
  3. 3.University of Liverpool Management SchoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations