Advertisement

A Self-Tuning Regulator by Using Bacterial Foraging Algorithm for Weight Belt Feeder

  • Behnaz Zare
  • Seyed Mohammad Ali Mohammadi
  • Mohammad Kiani
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 250)

Abstract

Industrial palnts are always exposed to environmenal changes and different disturbances. So producing a controller that can adapt with environmental changes and disturbances is an important issue. The weight belt feeder used in this research is a typical process feeder that is designed to transport solid materials into a manufacturing process at a constant feedrate and this feedrate should be controlled by a controller. A method to produce a controller with the ability to adapt with environmental changes is design and implementation of an indirect self-tuning regulator. At the end we can conclude that using this controller with an advanced heuristic algorithm based on bacterial foraging makes the performace of the system better.

Keywords

Adaptive Control Indirect Self-Tuning Regulator Weight belt feeder bacterial foraging 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao, Y., Collins Jr., E.G., Cartes, D.A.: Self-tuning adaptive control for an industrial weigh belt feeder. ISA Transactions 42 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Collins, E.G., Zhao Jr., Y., Millett, R.: A genetic search approach to unfalsified PI control design for a weigh belt feeder. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 15, 519–534 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao, Y., Collins Jr., E.G.: Fuzzy PI control of an industrial weigh belt feeder. In: Proceedings of American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK, pp. 3534–3539 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Astrom, K.J.: Theory and applications of adaptive control—A survey. Automatica 19, 471–486 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Astrom, K.J., Wittenmark, B.: Adaptive Control, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Astrom, K.J.: Tuning and adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of IFAC, San Francisco, CA, vol. K, pp. 1–18 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang, T.C., Yang, J.C.S., Kudva, P.: Loadadaptive control of a single-link flexible manipulator. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22, 85–91 (1992)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ji, J.K., Sul, S.K.: DSP-based self-tuning IP speed controller with load torque compensation for rolling mill DC drive. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 42, 382–386 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai, C.C., Lu, C.H.: Multivariable self-tuning temperature control for plastic injection molding process. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 34, 310–318 (1998); Eng. Pract. 8, 1285–1296 (2000) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Astrom, K.J., Wittenmark, B.: Self-tuning controllers based on pole-zero placement. IEE Proc.-D: Control Theory Appl. 127, 120–130 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Passino, K.M.: Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 22, 52–67 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, Y., Passino, K.M.: Biomimicry of social foraging bacteria for distributed optimization: Models, principles, and emergent behaviors. J. Optimization Theory Applicat. 115(3), 603–628 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Behnaz Zare
    • 1
  • Seyed Mohammad Ali Mohammadi
    • 1
  • Mohammad Kiani
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical Engineering DepartmentShahid Bahonar University of KermanKermanIran

Personalised recommendations