Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set Extension of DEMATEL Method
The purpose of this study was to extend the DEMATEL (Decision-Making Trail and Evaluation Laboratory) method based on the interval type-2 fuzzy sets to obtain the weights of criteria based on words. Generally most decision making methods consider the independency between criteria. DEMATEL method considers the inter-relations between criteria. Some decision making methods use words as the enabler of the decision making. These methods consider the perceptions of decision makers, the uncertainty assigned to each word and map the words into interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2 FSs). Therefore we extended the DEMATEL method to obtain the weights that can be used in decision making. The application of this method was proposed for six criteria.
KeywordsDecision making DEMATEL Interval Type 2 Fuzzy Sets (IT2 FSs)
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Gabus, A., Fontela, E.: Perceptions of the World Problematique: Communication Procedure, Communicating With Those Bearing Collective Responsibility (DEMATEL Report No. 1). Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, Switzerland (1973)Google Scholar
- 3.Mendel, M.J., Wu, D.: Perceptual Computing: Aiding People in Making Subjective Judgments. Wiley-IEEE Press (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Yang, J.L., Tzeng, G.-H.: An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method, vol. 38, pp. 1417–1424 (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Mendel, M.J., Wu, D.: Perceptual reasoning: A new computing with wordsengine. In: Proc. IEEE Int’l Conf. on Granular Computing, Silicon Valley, CA, pp. 446–451 (2007)Google Scholar
- 16.Hamrawi, H., Coupland, S.: Type-2 fuzzy arithmetic using alpha-planes. In: IFSA-EUSFLAT Conference (2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.: Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic Theory and Applications. Van Nostran Reinhold Co. Inc. (1985)Google Scholar
- 18.Wu, D., Mendel, J.M.: Corrections to Aggregation Using the Linguistic Weighted Average and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 16(6) (2008)Google Scholar