Skip to main content

PROLEG: An Implementation of the Presupposed Ultimate Fact Theory of Japanese Civil Code by PROLOG Technology

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6797))

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a legal reasoning system called PROLEG (PROlog based LEGal reasoning support system) based on the Japanese “theory of presupposed ultimate facts” (called “Yoken-jijitsu-ron” in Japanese, the JUF theory, in short). The theory is used for decision making by judges under incomplete information. Previously, we proposed a translation of the theory into logic programming. However, it turns out that the knowledge representation in logic programming is difficult for lawyers to understand. So, in this paper, we change knowledge representation of rules in the JUF theory in PROLEG so that we reflect lawyers’ reasoning using the idea of “openness” proposed by a judge who is a main investigator of the JUF theory.

This work has been done partially while Kento Asai, Masahiro Kubota, Megumi Nakamura, Kei Shirakawa and Chiaki Takano were with NII.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dung, P.M.: On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321–358 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon, T.F., Prakken, H., Walton, D.: The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15), 875–896 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ito, S.: Lecture Series on Ultimate Facts. Shojihomu (2008) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCarty, L.T., Sridharan, N.S., Sangster, B.C.: The Implementation of TAXMAN II: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning. Report LRP-TR-2, Rutgers University (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prakken, H.: Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law. Law and Philosophy Library 32 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Formalising Arguments about the Burden of Persuasion. In: Proc. of ICAIL 2007, pp. 97–106 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Satoh, K., Kubota, M., Nishigai, Y., Takano, C.: Translating the Japanese Presupposed Ultimate Fact Theory into Logic Programming. In: Proc. of JURIX 2009, pp. 162–171 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sergot, M.J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R.A., Kriwaczek, F., Hammond, P., Cory, H.T.: The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program. CACM 29(5), 370–386 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshino, H.: On the Logical Foundations of Compound Predicate Formulae for Legal Knowledge Representation, vol. 5(1-2), pp. 77–96 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Satoh, K. et al. (2011). PROLEG: An Implementation of the Presupposed Ultimate Fact Theory of Japanese Civil Code by PROLOG Technology. In: Onada, T., Bekki, D., McCready, E. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6797. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25654-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25655-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics