Skip to main content

Legal Modelling and Reasoning Using Institutions

  • Conference paper
New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (JSAI-isAI 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6797))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

To safeguard fairness for all parties involved and proper procedure, actions within a legal context are heavily constrained. Detailed laws determine when actions are permissible and admissible. However, these restrictions do not prevent participants from acting. In this paper we present a methodology to support legal reasoning using institutions—systems that specify the normative behaviour of participants—and a corresponding computational model. We show how it provides a useful separation between the identification of real world actions, if and how they affect the legal model and how consequences within the legal model can be specified and verified. Thus, it is possible to define a context, introduce a real-world event and examine how this changes the state of the legal model: hence, the modeller can explore both model adequacy and that of the legal framework from which it is derived, as well as offering a machine-usable legal ‘oracle’ for software components. We illustrate the use of our framework by modelling contract cancellation under Japanese contract law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cliffe, O., De Vos, M., Padget, J.: Specifying and reasoning about multiple institutions. In: Noriega, P., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Boella, G., Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Fornara, N., Matson, E. (eds.) COIN 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4386, pp. 67–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denecker, M.: What’s in a model? Epistemological analysis of logic programming. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference (KR 2004), pp. 106–113 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing 9(3-4), 365–386 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Governatori, G.: Representing business contracts in RuleML. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 14(2-3), 181–216 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Defeasible logic: Agency, intention and obligation. In: Lomuscio, A., Nute, D. (eds.) DEON 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3065, pp. 114–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Grossi, D., Meyer, J.-J.C., Dignum, F.: The many faces of counts-as: A formal analysis of constitutive rules. J. Applied Logic 6(2), 192–217 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrestad, H.: Norms and formalization. In: ICAIL 1991: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 175–184. ACM Press, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hopton, L., Cliffe, O., De Vos, M., Padget, J.: Instql: A query language for virtual institutions using answer set programming. In: ClimaX, pp. 87–104 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Searle, J.R.: The Construction of Social Reality. The Penguin Press, Allen Lane (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.: On the characterization of law and computer systems: the normative systems perspective. In: Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification, pp. 275–307. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.: A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power. ACM Computing Surveys 28(4es), 121 (1996) (Read November 28, 2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Prakken, H., Sergot, M.J.: Contrary-to-duty obligations. Studia Logica (SLOGICA) 57(1), 91–115 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Wiley, Chichester (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Vos, M., Padget, J., Satoh, K. (2011). Legal Modelling and Reasoning Using Institutions. In: Onada, T., Bekki, D., McCready, E. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6797. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25654-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25655-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics