Abstract
Decision markets both predict and decide the future. They allow experts to predict the effects of each of a set of possible actions, and after reviewing these predictions a decision maker selects an action to perform. When the future is independent of the market, strictly proper scoring rules myopically incentivize experts to predict consistent with their beliefs, but this is not generally true when a decision is to be made. When deciding, only predictions for the chosen action can be evaluated for their accuracy since the other predictions become counterfactuals. This limitation can make some actions more valuable than others for an expert, incentivizing the expert to mislead the decision maker. We construct and characterize decision markets that are – like prediction markets using strictly proper scoring rules – myopic incentive compatible. These markets require the decision maker always risk taking every available action, and reducing this risk increases the decision maker’s worst-case loss. We also show a correspondence between strictly proper decision markets and strictly proper sets of prediction markets, creating a formal connection between the incentives of prediction and decision markets.
This material is based upon work supported by NSF Grant No. CCF-0915016. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors alone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berg, J.E., Forsythe, R., Nelson, F.D., Rietz, T.A.: Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. In: Plott, C.A., Smith, V. (eds.) Handbook of Experimental Economic Results (2001)
Berg, J.E., Rietz, T.A.: Prediction markets as decision support systems. Information Systems Frontier 5, 79–93 (2003)
Chen, K.-Y., Plott, C.R.: Information aggregation mechanisms: Concept, design and implementation for a sales forecasting problem. Working paper No. 1131, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences (2002)
Chen, Y., Dimitrov, S., Sami, R., Reeves, D.M., Pennock, D.M., Hanson, R.D., Fortnow, L., Gonen, R.: Gaming prediction markets: Equilibrium strategies with a market maker. Algorithmica 58(4), 930–969 (2010)
Chen, Y., Gao, X.A., Goldstein, R., Kash, I.A.: Market manipulation with outside incentives. In: AAAI 2011: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2011)
Chen, Y., Kash, I.A.: Information elicitation for decision making. In: AAMAS 2011: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2011)
Chen, Y., Pennock, D.M.: A utility framework for bounded-loss market makers. In: UAI 2007: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 49–56 (2007)
Debnath, S., Pennock, D.M., Giles, C.L., Lawrence, S.: Information incorporation in online in-game sports betting markets. In: EC 2003: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 258–259. ACM, New York (2003)
Dimitrov, S., Sami, R.: Composition of markets with conflicting incentives. In: EC 2010: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 53–62. ACM, New York (2010)
Gneiting, T., Raftery, A.E.: Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102(477), 359–378 (2007)
Hanson, R.: Decision markets. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3), 16–19 (1999)
Hanson, R.D.: Combinatorial information market design. Information Systems Frontiers 5(1), 107–119 (2003)
Hanson, R.D.: Logarithmic market scoring rules for modular combinatorial information aggregation. Journal of Prediction Markets 1(1), 1–15 (2007)
McCarthy, J.: Measures of the value of information. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 42(9), 654–655 (1956)
Ostrovsky, M.: Information aggregation in dynamic markets with strategic traders. In: EC 2009: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, p. 253. ACM, New York (2009)
Othman, A., Sandholm, T.: Decision rules and decision markets. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 625–632 (2010)
Savage, L.J.: Elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66(336), 783–801 (1971)
Wolfers, J., Zitzewitz, E.: Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspective 18(2), 107–126 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chen, Y., Kash, I., Ruberry, M., Shnayder, V. (2011). Decision Markets with Good Incentives. In: Chen, N., Elkind, E., Koutsoupias, E. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7090. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25510-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25510-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25509-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25510-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)