Skip to main content

Minimal Group - Maximal Effect? Evaluation and Anthropomorphization of the Humanoid Robot NAO

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7072))

Abstract

How can we increase acceptance and anthropomorphism of robots? In an experiment with N = 45 participants, we tested whether categorizing the humanoid robot NAO as an in-group member vs. an out-group member would result in more positive evaluations and higher levels of anthropomorphism of the robot NAO. Results fully support our hypotheses. Moreover, the present findings also indicate that sharing in-group membership with NAO led to greater willingness to interact with robots in general.

This research was funded by the German Research Council (COE 277).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114, 864–886 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luczak, H., Rötting, M., Schmidt, L.: Let’s Talk: Anthropomorphization as a Means to Cope with Stress of Interacting with Technical Devices. Ergonomics 46, 1361–1374 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eyssel, F., Hegel, F.: (S)he’s got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Social Robots. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hegel, F., Eyssel, F., Wrede, B.: The Social Robot Flobi: Key Concepts of Industrial Design. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), pp. 120–125 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eyssel, F., Hegel, F., Horstmann, G., Wagner, C.: Anthropomorphic Inferences from Emotional Nonverbal Cues: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), pp. 681–686 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and the Social Robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42, 170–190 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Duffy, B.R.: Fundamental Issues in Affective Intelligent Social Machines. Open Artif. Int. J. 2, 21–34 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mori, M.: The Buddha in the Robot. Charles E. Tuttle Co., Japan (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tajfel, H., Billig, M.G., Bundy, R.P., Flament, C.: Social Categorization and Intergroup Behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1, 149–178 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In: Austin, W.G., Worchel, S. (eds.) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp. 33–47. Brooks/Cole, Oxford, England (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F.: Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Psychol. Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson, L.A., Hodge, C.N., Gerard, D.A., Ingram, J.M., Ervin, K.S., Sheppard, L.A.: Cognition, Affect, and Behavior in the Prediction of Group Attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 22, 306–316 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haslam, N.: Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 252–264 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leyens, J.-P., Paladino, M.P., Rodríguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodríguez-Pérez, A., et al.: The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4, 186–197 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leyens, J.-P., Rodriguez, A.P., Rodriguez, R.T., Gaunt, R., Paladino, P.M., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S.: Psychological Essentialism and the Attribution of Uniquely Human Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 31, 395–411 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D.: My Robot is More Human than Yours: Effects of Group Membership on Anthropomorphic Judgments of the Social Robot Flobi. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2011) (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nass, C., Isbister, K., Lee, E.-J.: Truth is Beauty: Researching Embodied Conversational Agents. In: Cassells, J. (ed.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 374–402. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., Moon, Y.: Can Computers be Teammates? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Int. 45, 669–678 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. J. Soc. Issues 56, 81–103 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pierris, G., Dahl, T.S.: Compressed Sparse Code Hierarchical SOM on Learning and Reproducing Gestures in Humanoid Robots. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2010), pp. 681–686 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D.: Manipulating Anthropomorphic Inferences about NAO: The Role of Situational and Dispositional Aspects of Effectance Motivation. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2011), pp. 467–472 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C.M., Park, B.: Evaluative versus Conceptual Judgments in Automatic Stereotyping and Prejudice. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 37, 244–252 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goette, L., Huffman, D., Meier, S.: The Impact of Group Membership on Cooperation and Norm Enforcement: Evidence using Random Assignment to Real Social Groups. The Am. Ec. Rev. 96, 212–216 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuchenbrandt, D., Eyssel, F., Bobinger, S., Neufeld, M. (2011). Minimal Group - Maximal Effect? Evaluation and Anthropomorphization of the Humanoid Robot NAO. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7072. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25503-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25504-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics