Skip to main content

Modeling of Contact Angle for a Liquid in Contact with a Rough Surface

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2088 Accesses

Part of the book series: Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering ((BIOMEDICAL))

Abstract

The surface atoms or molecules of liquids or solids have fewer bonds with neighboring atoms, and therefore, they have higher energy than similar atoms and molecules in the interior. This additional energy is characterized quantitatively by the surface tension or free surface energy γ, which is equal to the work that is required to create a unit area of the surface at a constant pressure and temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adamson AV (1990) Physical chemistry of surfaces. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anisimov MA (2007) Divergence of Tolman’s length for a droplet near the critical point. Phys Rev Lett 98:035702

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bahadur V, Garimella SV (2007) Electrowetting-based control of static droplet states on rough surfaces. Langmuir 23:4918–4924

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barbieri L, Wagner E, Hoffmann P (2007) Water wetting transition parameters of perfluorinated substrates with periodically distributed flat-top microscale obstavles. Langmuir 23:1723–1734

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bartell FE, Shepard JW (1953) Surface roughness as related to hysteresis of contact angles. J Phys Chem 57:455–458

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhushan B (1999) Principles and applications of tribology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhushan B (2002) Introduction to tribology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bhushan B, Jung YC (2007) Wetting study of patterned surfaces for superhydrophobicity. Ultramicroscopy 107:1033–1041

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhushan B, Jung YC (2008) Wetting, adhesion and friction of superhydrophobic and hydrophilic leaves and fabricated micro/nanopatterned surfaces. J Phys Condens Matter 20:225010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhushan B, Jung YC (2011) Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction. Prog Mater Sci 56:1–108

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhushan B, Nosonovsky M (2010) The rose petal effect and the modes of superhydrophobicity. Philos Trans R Soc A 368:4713–4728

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bhushan B, Nosonovsky M, Jung YC (2007) Towards optimization of patterned superhydrophobic surfaces. J R Soc Interface 4:643–648

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bormashenko E, Pogreb R, Whyman G, Erlich M (2007) Cassie-Wenzel wetting transition in vibrated drops deposited on the rough surfaces: is dynamic Cassie-Wenzel transition 2D or 1D affair? Langmuir 23:6501–6503

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boruvka L, Neumann AW (1977) Generalization of the classical theory of capillarity. J Chem Phys 66:5464–5476

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cassie ABD (1948) Contact angles. Discuss Faraday Soc 3:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551

    Google Scholar 

  17. Checco A, Guenoun P, Daillant J (2003) Nonlinear dependence of the contact angle of nanodroplets on contact line curvatures. Phys Rev Lett 91:186101

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng YT, Rodak DE, Angelopoulos A, Gacek T (2005) Microscopic observations of condensation of water on lotus leaves. Appl Phys Lett 87:194112

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Gennes PG, Brochard-Wyart F, Quėrė D (2003) Capillarity and wetting phenomena. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  20. Derjaguin BV, Churaev NV (1974) Structural component of disjoining pressure. J Colloid Interface Sci 49:249–255

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eustathopoulos N, Nicholas MG, Drevet B (1999) Wettability at high temperatures. Pergamon, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  22. Extrand CW (2002) Model for contact angle and hysteresis on rough and ultraphobic surfaces. Langmuir 18:7991–7999

    Google Scholar 

  23. Extrand CW (2003) Contact angle hysteresis on surfaces with chemically heterogeneous islands. Langmuir 19:3793–3796

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feng XJ, Feng L, Jin MH, Zhai J, Jiang L, Zhu DB (2004) Reversible super-hydrophobicity to super-hydrophilicity transition of aligned ZnO nanorod films. J Am Chem Soc 126:62–63

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2007) How Wenzel and Cassie were wrong. Langmuir 23:3762–3765

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta P, Ulman A, Fanfan F, Korniakov A, Loos K (2005) Mixed self-assembled monolayer of alkanethiolates on ultrasmooth gold do not exhibit contact angle hysteresis. J Am Chem Soc 127:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  27. Israelachvili JN (1992) Intermolecular and surface forces, 2nd edn. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Israelachvili JN, Gee ML (1989) Contact angles on chemically heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 5:288–289

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson RE, Dettre RH (1964) Contact angle hysteresis. In: Fowkes FM (ed) Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion. Advances in chemistry series, vol 43. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 112–135

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jung YC, Bhushan B (2006) Contact angle, adhesion, and friction properties of micro- and nanopatterned polymers for superhydrophobicity. Nanotechnology 17, 4970–4980

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jung YC, Bhushan B (2007) Wetting transition of water droplets on superhydrophobic patterned surfaces. Scripta Mater 57:1057–1060

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jung YC, Bhushan B (2008a) Wetting behavior during evaporation and condensation of water microdroplets on superhydrophobic patterned surfaces. J Microsc 229:127–140

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jung YC, Bhushan B (2008b) Dynamic effects of bouncing water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 24:6262–6269

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kamusewitz H, Possart W, Paul D (1999) The relation between Young’s equilibrium contact angle and the hysteresis on rough paraffin wax surfaces. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 156:271–279

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kijlstra J, Reihs K, Klami A (2002) Roughness and topology of ultra-hydrophobic surfaces. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 206:521–529

    Google Scholar 

  36. Krupenkin TN, Taylor JA, Schneider TM, Yang S (2004) From rolling ball to complete wetting: the dynamic tuning of liquids on nanostructured surfaces. Langmuir 20:3824–3827

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lafuma A, Quėrė D (2003) Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater 2:457–460

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li W, Amirfazli A (2006) A thermodynamic approach for determining the contact angle hysteresis for superhydrophobic surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 292:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  39. Marmur A, (2003) Wetting on hydrophobic rough surfaces: to be heterogeneous or not to be? Langmuir 19:8343–8348

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nosonovsky M (2007a) Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interfaces. Langmuir 23:3157–3161

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nosonovsky M (2007b) Model for solid-liquid and solid-solid friction for rough surfaces with adhesion hysteresis. J Chem Phys 126:224701

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nosonovsky M (2007c) On the range of applicability of the Wenzel and Cassie equations. Langmuir 23:9919–9920

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2005) Roughness optimization for biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces. Microsyst Technol 11:535–549

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2006a) Stochastic model for metastable wetting of roughness-induced superhydrophobic surfaces. Microsyst Technol 12:231–237

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2006b) Wetting of rough three-dimensional superhydrophobic surfaces. Microsyst Technol 12:273–281

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007a) Multiscale friction mechanisms and hierarchical surfaces in nano- and bio-tribology. Mater Sci Eng R 58:162–193

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007b) Hierarchical roughness makes superhydrophobic surfaces stable. Microelectron Eng 84:382–386

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007c) Biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces: multiscale approach. Nano Lett 7:2633–2637

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2007d) Hierarchical roughness optimization for biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces. Ultramicroscopy 107:969–979

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008a) Multiscale dissipative mechanisms and hierarchical surfaces: friction, superhydrophobicity, and biomimetics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008b) Roughness-induced superhydrophobicity: a way to design non-adhesive surfaces. J Phys Condens Matter 20:225009

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008c) Biologically-inspired surfaces: broadening the scope of roughness. Adv Funct Mater 18:843–855

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008d) Patterned non-adhesive surfaces: superhydrophobicity and wetting regime transitions. Langmuir 24:1525–1533

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008e) Do hierarchical mechanisms of superhydrophobicity lead to self-organized criticality? Scripta Mater 59:941–944

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2008f) Energy transitions in superhydrophobicity: low adhesion, easy flow and bouncing. J Phys Condens Matter 20:395005

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2009) Superhydrophobic surfaces and emerging applications: non-adhesion, energy, green engineering. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 14:270–280

    Google Scholar 

  57. Patankar NA (2004) Transition between superhydrophobic states on rough surfaces. Langmuir 20:7097–7102

    Google Scholar 

  58. Pompe T, Fery A, Herminghaus S (2000) Measurement of contact line tension by analysis of the three-phase boundary with nanometer resolution. In: Drelich J, Laskowski JS, Mittal KL (eds) Apparent and microscopic contact angles. VSP, Utrecht, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  59. Quéré D (2005) Non-sticking drops. Rep Prog Phys 68:2495–2535

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sun M, Luo C, Xu L, Ji H, Ouyang Q, Yu D, Chen Y (2005) Artificial lotus leaf by nanocasting. Langmuir 21:8978–8981

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tretinnikov ON (2000) Wettability and microstructure of polymer surfaces: stereochemical and conformational aspects. In: Drelich J, Laskowski JS, Mittal KL (eds) Apparent and microscopic contact angles. VSP, Utrecht, pp 111–128

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, Mabry JM, Mazzella SA, Rutledge GC, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2007) Designing superoleophobic surfaces. Science 318:1618–1622

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of Solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng Chem 28:988–994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharat Bhushan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhushan, B. (2012). Modeling of Contact Angle for a Liquid in Contact with a Rough Surface. In: Biomimetics. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25408-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25408-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25407-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25408-6

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics