Advertisement

Accessibility Evaluation for Open Source Word Processors

  • Christophe Strobbe
  • Bert Frees
  • Jan Engelen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7058)

Abstract

In parallel with the products of Microsoft’s Office suite, two open source word processors are gaining popularity. OpenOffice.org Writer and its more recent alternative (or “fork”) LibreOffice Writer both implement as their default storage format the OpenDocument Text format (ODT, a subset of ODF) and support various output formats including the Portable Document Format (PDF) and XHTML. Through the extensions “odt2daisy” and “odt2braille”, developed within the European ÆGIS project, both Writers can also export ODT documents to DAISY (audio books, talking books) and to printable Braille, taking into account its language and country dependent formatting rules. This contribution focuses on the accessibility evaluation software that was developed in the same European ÆGIS project, intended to support authors in creating accessible ODT documents that can be converted error-free into DAISY and/or Braille.

Keywords

Accessibility accessibility evaluation office documents OpenOffice.org LibreOffice Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abou-Zahra, S. (ed.) Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema - W3C Working Draft, May 10 (2011), http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-EARL10-Schema-20110510/
  2. 2.
    Accessible Digital Office Document (ADOD) Project. Accessibility of Office Documents and Office Applications, http://adod.idrc.ocad.ca/
  3. 3.
    ÆGIS - Open Accessibility Everywhere: Groundwork, Infrastructure, Standards, http://www.aegis-project.eu/
  4. 4.
    Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I. (eds.) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 - W3C Recommendation, May 5 (1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/
  5. 5.
    Eclipse Foundation. ACTF aDesigner (no date), http://www.eclipse.org/actf/downloads/tools/aDesigner/index.php
  6. 6.
    International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the Global Initiative for Inclusive ICTs (G3ict). Technology areas (no date), http://www.e-accessibilitytoolkit.org/toolkit/technology_areas
  7. 7.
    National Information Standards Organization (NISO). ANSI/NISO Z39.86-2005. Revision of ANSI/NISO Z39.86-2002. Specifications for the Digital Talking Book, http://www.daisy.org/z3986/2005/Z3986-2005.html
  8. 8.
    Korn, P.: Accessibility test tool for OpenDocument files. Peter Korn’s Weblog, December 8 (2006), http://blogs.oracle.com/korn/entry/automated_testing_of_opendocument_files
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). IBM aDesigner (no date), http://www-03.ibm.com/able/accessibility_services/adesigner.html
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools: Overview, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/ (last updated March 17, 2006)
  15. 15.
    Web Accessibility in Mind (WebAIM). OpenOffice.org and Accessibility (no date), http://webaim.org/techniques/ooo/
  16. 16.
    Strobbe, C., Frees, B., Engelen, J.: An Accessibility Checker for OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice Writer. Paper accepted for the second Ægis Conference, Brussels, December 1-2 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    United Nations CONVENTION on the RIGHTS of PERSONS with DISABILITIES (December 2006), http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
  18. 18.
    EPUB standard for electronic books, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPUB

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christophe Strobbe
    • 1
  • Bert Frees
    • 1
  • Jan Engelen
    • 1
  1. 1.Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenHeverlee-LeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations