Skip to main content

Comparison of Rules Synthesis Methods Accuracy in the System of Type 1 Diabetes Prediction

  • Chapter
Internet - Technical Developments and Applications 2

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 118))

  • 566 Accesses

Abstract

While creating the decision support system we encounter the classification accuracy problem. In the paper author compares the accuracy of two rules synthesis algorithms based on the rough set theory. This comparison is based on the medical support system that goal is to predict the illness among the children with genetic susceptibility to DMT1. The system can help to recommend including a person to pre-diabetes therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazan, J., Nguyen, H.S., Nguyen, S.H., Synak, P., Wróblewski, J.: Rough set algorithms in classification problems. In: Polkowski, L., Lin, T.Y., Tsumoto, S. (eds.) Rough Set Methods and Applications: New Developments in Knowledge Discovery in Information Systems. STUDFUZZ, vol. 56, pp. 49–88. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bazan, J.G., Szczuka, M.S., Wróblewski, J.: A New Version of Rough Set Exploration System. In: Alpigini, J.J., Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Zhong, N. (eds.) RSCTC 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2475, pp. 397–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Deja, G., Jarosz-Chobot, P., Polañska, J., Siekiera, U., Maşecka-Tendera, E.: Is the association between TNF-alpha-308 A allele and DMT1 independent of HLA-DRB1, DQB1 alleles? Mediators Inflamm. 2006, 19724 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deja, R.: Applying rough set theory to the system of type 1 diabetes prediction. In: Tkacz, E., Kapczynski, A. (eds.) Internet – Technical Development and Applications. AISC, vol. 64, pp. 119–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Grzymala-Busse, J., Wang, A.: Modified algorithms lem1 and lem2 for rule induction from data with missing attribute values. In: Proc. of 5th Int. Workshop on Rough Sets and Soft Computing, pp. 69–72 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grzymala-Busse, J.W.: Mlem2-discretization during rule induction. In: Proceedings of the International IIS, pp. 499–508 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grzymala-Busse, J.W.: Selected Algorithms of Machine Learning from Examples. Fundamenta Informaticae 18, 193–207 (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ilczuk, G., Wakulicz-Deja, A.: Rough sets approach to medical diagnosis system. In: Szczepaniak, P.S., Kacprzyk, J., Niewiadomski, A. (eds.) AWIC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3528, pp. 204–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Komorowski, H.J., Pawlak, Z., Polkowski, L.T., Skowron, A.: Rough Sets: A Tutorial, pp. 3–98. Springer, Singapore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Midelfart, H., Komorowski, H.J., Norsett, K.G., Yadetie, F., Sandvik, A.K., Laegreid, A.: Learning rough set classifiers from gene expressions and clinical data. Fundamenta Informaticae 53, 155–183 (2002)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Skowron, A., Rauszer, G.: The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems. In: Sşowinski, R. (ed.) Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, pp. 331–336. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Slowinski, K., Stefanowsk, J., Siwinski, R.: Application of rule induction and rough sets to verification of magnetic resonance diagnosis. Fundam. Inform. 53, 345–363 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tsumoto, S.: Extracting structure of medical diagnosis: Rough set approach. In Wang, G., Liu, Q., Yao, Y., Skowron, A., eds.: Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing. In: Wang, G., Liu, Q., Yao, Y., Skowron, A. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2639, pp. 78–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsumoto, S.: Mining diagnostic rules from clinical databases using rough sets and medical diagnostic model. Information Sciences: An International Journal 162, 65–80 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wakulicz-Deja, A., Paszek, P.: Applying rough set theory to multi stage medical diagnosing. Fundamenta Informaticae 54, 387–408 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafal Deja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deja, R. (2012). Comparison of Rules Synthesis Methods Accuracy in the System of Type 1 Diabetes Prediction. In: Kapczyński, A., Tkacz, E., Rostanski, M. (eds) Internet - Technical Developments and Applications 2. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 118. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25355-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25355-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25354-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25355-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics