Abstract
Service providers that own Web2.0 services allow Internet users not only to access their Web2.0 services but also to create new Web2.0 services (mashups) based on theirs. This creation of mashups generates the Web2.0 service network, in which a node represents a Web2.0 service and a link between two nodes represents a mashup using the two Web2.0 services linked. Since this Web2.0 service network is constructed without the control of a single entity (i.e., it is self-organizing), the network topology of the Web2.0 service network shows the scale-free characteristic. With respect of the weighting of those links, however, there are different approaches. Prior research either considered binary links or links that are weighted by summing up the number of mashups. Since the last approach might overestimate the strength of the link, we calculate the link weights according to Newman’s approach in this paper. Based on this weighted graph of the Web2.0 service network, we investigate the topology of the weighted graph and examine the pattern of Web2.0 service creations. Our results show that the Newman-based weighted graph of the Web2.0 service network shows the characteristics of a scale-free network and a small-world network.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.-L.: Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature 401, 130–131 (1999)
Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.-L.: Error and Attack Tolerance of Complex Networks. Nature 406, 378–382 (2000)
Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R.: Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)
Barabási, A.-L.: Linked: The New Science of Networks. Perseus Pub., Massachusetts (2002)
Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: he Architecture of Complex Weighted Networks. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3747–3752 (2004)
Björneborn, L.: ’Mini small worlds’ of shortest link paths crossing domain boundaries in an academic space. Scientometrics 68, 395–414 (2006)
Feiler, J.: How to do Everything with Web2. McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)
Fu, F., Liu, L., Wang, L.: Empirical Analysis of Online Social Networks in the Age of Web2.0. Physica A 387, 675–684 (2008)
Hwang, J., Altmann, J., Kim, K.: The Structural Evolution of the Web2.0 Service Network. Online Inform. Rev. 33, 1040–1057 (2009)
Kim, B.J., Trusina, A., Minnhagen, P., Sneppen, K.: Self Organized Scale-Free Networks from Merging and Regeneration. Eur. Phys. J. B 43, 369–372 (2005)
Kim, K., Altmann, J., Hwang, J.: Measuring and Analyzing the Openness of the Web2.0 Service Network for Improving the Innovation Capacity of the Web2.0 System through Collective Intelligence. In: 1st Symposium on Collective Intelligence, Hagen, Germany (2010)
Kiss, C., Bichler, M.: Identification of Influencers: measuring Influence in Customer Networks. Decis. Support Syst. 46, 233–253 (2008)
Kuandykov, L., Sokolov, M.: Impact of social neighborhood on diffusion of innovation S-curve. Decis. Support Syst. 48, 531–535 (2010)
Lai, L.S.L., Turban, E.: Groups Formation and Operations in the Web2.0 Environment and Social Networks. Group Decis. Negot. 17, 387–402 (2008)
Milgram, S.: The Small-World Problem. Psychol. Today 1, 61–67 (1967)
Newman, M.E.J.: Scientific Collaboration Networks: II. Shortest Paths, Weighted Networks and Centrality. Phys. Rev. E 64, 016132 (2001)
Newman, M.E.J.: Clustering and Preferential Attachment in Growing Networks. Phys. Rev. E. 64, 025102 (2001)
Newman, M.E.J.: Power Laws, Pareto Distributions and Zipf’s Law. Contemp. Phys. 46, 323–351 (2005)
Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., Skvoretz, J.: Node Centrality in Weighted Networks: Generalizing Degree and Shortest Paths. Soc. Networks 32, 245–251 (2010)
O’Reilly, T.: What is Web2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Commun. Strat. 65, 17–37 (2007)
Park, K., Lai, Y.-C., Ye, N.: Self-Organized Scale-Free Networks. Phys. Rev. E 72, 026131 (2005)
Valverde, S., Solé, R.V.: Self-Organization versus Hierarchy in Open Source Social Networks. Phys. Rev. E 76, 046118 (2007)
Wagner, C.S., Leydesdorff, L.: Network Structure, Self-Organization, and the Growth of international Collaboration in Science. Res. Policy 34, 1608–1618 (2005)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective Dynamics of ’Small-World’ Networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
Yang, Y., Yu, X.: Weighted Small World Complex Networks: Smart Sliding Mode Control. In: Huang, D.-S., Jo, K.-H., Lee, H.-H., Kang, H.-J., Bevilacqua, V. (eds.) ICIC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5755, pp. 935–944. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Yee, R.: Pro Web2.0 Mashups: Remixing Data and Web Services. Apress, New York (2008)
Zammetti, F.W.: Practical Javascript, DOM Scripting, and Ajax Projects. Springer, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kim, K., Altmann, J. (2012). A Complex Network Analysis of the Weighted Graph of the Web2.0 Service Network. In: Altmann, J., Baumöl, U., Krämer, B. (eds) Advances in Collective Intelligence 2011. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 113. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25321-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25321-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25320-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25321-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)