Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards Designing Enterprises for Evolvability Based on Fundamental Engineering Concepts

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2011 Workshops (OTM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7046))

Abstract

Contemporary organizations are operating in a hypercompetitive environment, in which they are faced with challenges such as increasing complexity and increasing change in many or all of their aspects. As such, current organizations need to be more agile to keep up with the swiftly changing business environment. However, current development practices for information systems supporting these organizations appear to be insufficient to deal with these levels of changing complexity. Normalized Systems theory therefore proposes a theoretical framework that explains why current modular structures in information systems are intrinsically limited in terms of evolvability, as well as how modular structures can be built without these limitations, thus exhibiting evolvable modularity. The goal of the proposed Ph.D. research project is to develop a contribution to how evolvable modularity as a theoretical framework can be further extended from the technological level to the business level and as such support business processes, enterprise architectures and their supporting IT systems. The ultimate purpose will be to make organizations as a whole more agile by developing so-called normalized design patterns (domain models) on the business level in order to allow a more deterministic approach enabling the ‘expanding’ of enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beer, M., Nohria, N.: Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review 78(3), 13–23 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks, F.P.: The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campagnolo, D., Camuffo, A.: The concept of modularity within the management studies: a literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews 12(3), 259–283 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Bruyn, P., Van Nuffel, D., Huysmans, P., Mannaert, H.: Towards functional and constructional perspectives on business process patterns. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, ICSEA (in press, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dietz, J.L.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitzgerald, B.: An empirical investigation into the adoption of systems development methodologies. Information & Management 34(6), 317–328 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fowler, M.: Analysis Patterns: Reusable Object Models. Addison-Wesley Professional (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Harper Business (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hay, D.C.: Data Model Patterns: Conventions of Thought. Dorset House (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoogervorst, J.A.: Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Hruby, P., Kiehn, J., Scheller, C.: Model-Driven Design Using Business Patterns. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huysmans, P., Bellens, D., Van Nuffel, D., Ven, K.: Aligning the Constructs of Enterprise Ontology and Normalized Systems. In: Albani, A., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds.) CIAO! 2010. LNBIP, vol. 49, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Janow, R.: Shannon entropy and productivity: Why big organizations can seem stupid. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 90(1) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kodaganallur, V., Shim, S.: Analysis patterns: A taxonomy and its implications. Information Systems Management 23(3), 52–61 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehman, M.: Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proceedings of the IEEE 68(9), 1060–1076 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehman, M., Ramil, J.: Rules and tools for software evolution planning and management. Annals of Software Engineering 11, 15–44 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Lientz, B.P., Swanson, E.B.: Problems in application software maintenance. Communications of the ACM 24, 763–769 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luftman, J., Ben-Zvi, T.: Key issues for it executives 2010: Judicious it investments continue post-recession. MIS Quarterly Executive 9(4), 263–273 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Malone, T., Crowston, K., Lee, J., Pentland, B., Dellarocas, C., Wyner, G., Quimby, J., Osborn, C., Bernstein, A., Herman, G., Klein, M., O’Donnell, E.: Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Science 45(3), 425–443 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: The transformation of requirements into software primitives: Studying evolvability based on systems theoretic stability. Science of Computer Programming 76(12), 1210–1222 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: Towards evolvable software architectures based on systems theoretic stability. Software Practice and Experience Early View (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J.: Normalized Systems: Re-creating Information Technology Based on Laws for Software Evolvability. Koppa (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. March, S.T.M., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Op’t Land, M.: Applying Architecture and Ontology to the Splitting and Allying of Enterprises. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Delft, NL (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rotherberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Riemenschneider, C., Hardgrave, B., Davis, F.: Explaining software developer acceptance of methodologies: A comparison of five theoretical models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(12), 1135–1145 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Scheer, A.W.: Business Process Engineering – Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Silver, B.: BPMN Method & Style. Cody-Cassidy Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Silverston, L.: The Data Model Resource Book. A Library of Universal Data Models for All Enterprises, vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Standish Group: The standish group report: Chaos. Tech. rep. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tallon, P.P., Pinsonneault, A.: Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quarterly 35(2), 463–486 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van Nuffel, D.: Towards Designing Modular and Evolvable Business Processes. Ph.D. thesis, University of Antwerp (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Van Nuffel, D., Mannaert, H., De Backer, C., Verelst, J.: Towards a deterministic business process modelling method based on normalized theory. International Journal on Advances in Software 3(1/2), 54–69 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Applied Economics, Department of Management Information Systems, University of Antwerp, Belgium

    Peter De Bruyn

Authors
  1. Peter De Bruyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. STAR Lab, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Bldg G/10, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussel, Belgium

    Robert Meersman

  2. DEBII, Curtin University of Technology, Technology Park, De Laeter Way, 6102, Bentley, WA, Australia

    Tharam Dillon

  3. Facultad de Informática, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus de Montegancedo S/N, 28660, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain

    Pilar Herrero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Bruyn, P. (2011). Towards Designing Enterprises for Evolvability Based on Fundamental Engineering Concepts. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2011 Workshops. OTM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7046. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25126-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25126-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25125-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25126-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation