Skip to main content

Three Worlds of Natural Resources and Power

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Power in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Global Power Shift ((GLOBAL))

Abstract

The supply of natural resources can be a decisive element of 21st century international relations. A world with dwindling resources and environmental degradation poses serious challenges to the global economy and politics. Supply hardly can keep up with the demand of an increasing and prospering population. After several years of wallflower existence, energy security today again appears in the notepads of leading politicians, not least because the rising demand of emerging powers. The social turmoil in Haiti in 2008 and recent unrests in Maghreb countries demonstrate the relentless consequences of rising food prices for political stability. Conflicts over water in Middle East or South East Asia, though not insoluble, are a prevalent phenomenon of our time (Delli Priscoli and Wolf 2009; Grover 2007). Industrialized countries started to worry about the dependence on raw materials, previously virtually an exclusively economic issue (European Commission 2011; U.S. Department of Energy 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Different from Barnett and Duvall, I consider structural and productive power together as constitutive of social relations.

  2. 2.

    Many resource-rich countries, however, fail to translate natural richness into economic richness and national strength. According to the “Resource Curse” and the “Dutch Disease” resource-rich countries are prone to social conflicts and build a weak industry (Auty 1993; Corden 1984).

  3. 3.

    In the literature, there are some thought experiments about possible futures of energy and politics. An interesting study by Friedrichs (2010) shows that there is no unilinear relation between “oil peak” and a particular policy outcome. However, he understands oil scarcity solely in material terms and does not refer to the shared ideas of the actors.

References

  • Adelman, M. A. (1993). The economics of petroleum supply. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, P. (2009). China and India: A comparative analysis of approaches to energy security. New Delhi: United Service Institution of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auty, R. (1993). Sustaining development in mineral economies: The resource curse thesis. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in international politics. International Organization, 59(1), 39–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, K. J., Charpentier, R. R., Gautier, D. L., Houseknecht, D. W., Klett, T. R., Pitman, J. K., Moore, T. E., Schenk, C. J., Tennyson, M. E., & Wandrey, C. J. (2008). Circum-Arctic resource appraisal: Estimates of undiscovered oil and gas North of the Arctic circle. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D., & Liebertbal, K. (2007). Smooth sailing – The world’s shipping lanes are safe. Foreign Affairs, 86(3), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunden, Margaret. (2009). The New Problem of Arctic Stability. Survival 51(1), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. A., & Dworkin, M. (2011). The environmental dimension of energy security. In B. Sovacool (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of energy security. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & De Wilde, J. (1998). Security a new framework for analysis. London: Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2001). Socializing nature: theory, practice, and politics. In N. Castree & B. Braun (Eds.), Social nature: theory, practice, and politics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, R. S. (1975). World power assessment: A calculus of strategic drift. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Paul, & Anke, Hoeffler. (2000). Greed and grievance in civil war. In The World Bank policy research working paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W. M. (1984). Boom sector and Dutch disease economics: Survey and consolidation. Oxford Economic Papers, 36(3), 359–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (2010). Exorcising Malthus’s ghost: Resources and security in global politics. Geopolitics, 9(1), 242–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delli Priscoli, J., & Wolf, A. T. (2009). Managing and transforming water conflicts, international hydrology series. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense (2009) Strategic and critical materials operations report to congress: Operations under the strategic and critical materials stock piling act during the period October 2008 through September 2009. Edited by Department of Defense, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutch, J. (2007). Priority energy security issues. In J. Deutch, A. Lauvergeon, & W. Prawiraatmadja (Eds.), Energy security and climate change. Washington, DC/Paris/Tokyo: The Trilateral Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutch, J. M., James, R. S., & David, G. V. (2006). National security consequences of U.S. oil dependency: Report of an independent task force, independent task force report. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Erica. (2007). China’s quest for overseas oil. Far Eastern Economic Review (September 2007), 170, 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, E. S. (2010). Who’s afraid of China’s oil companies? In C. Pascual & J. Elkind (Eds.), Energy security. Economics, politics, strategies, and implications. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebel, R. E., Caruso, G., Nunn, S., & Schlesinger, J. R. (2000). The geopolitics of energy into the 21st century. volume 1: An overview and policy considerations (Vol. 1). CSIC Panel Report. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhefnawy, N. (2008). The impending oil shock. Survival, 50(2), 37–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration. (2009). Who are the major players supplying the world oil market? 2009. www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/world_oil_market.cfm. Accessed 29 July 2011.

  • European Commission. (2010). Critical raw materials for the EU. Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Tackling the challenges in commodity markets and on raw materials. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fettweis, C. J. (2009). No blood for oil: Why resource wars are obsolete. In G. Luft & A. Korin (Eds.), Energy security challenges for the 21st century. Santa Barbara: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, J. (2010). Global energy crunch: how different parts of the world would react to a peak oil scenario. Energy Policy, 38(8): 4562–4569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A. (2010). Global governance and energy. In C. Pascual & J. Elkind (Eds.), Energy security. Economics, politics, strategies, and implications. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2009). Global agriculture towards 2050. Rome: High Level Expert Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, I. (2006). Geopolitics or petropolitics? China and the global oil regime. In A. Griffith (Ed.), Global perspectives on oil and security. Halifax: Dalhousie University Centre for Foreign Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V. I. (2007). Water: A source of conflict or cooperation? Enfield: Science Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Stuart. (2010). Global and regional orders and the changing geopolitics of energy. Australian Journal of International Affairs 64(2), 166–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1991). On the threshold – Environmental-changes as causes of acute conflict (Reprinted). International Security, 16(2), 76–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyos, C. (2007). The new seven sisters: Oil and gas giants dwarf western rivals. Financial Times, 2007/3/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, Cindy (2006). China’s Oil Rush in Africa (Washington, DC: Institute for the Analysis of Global Security) http://www.iags.org/chinainafrica.pdf

  • International Energy Agency. (2010). World energy outlook 2010. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. (2011). IMF primary commodity prices, 2011/7/28 2011. http://www.imf.org/external/np/res/commod/index.aspx. Accessed 3 Aug 2011.

  • Jaffe, A. M. (2009). OPEC: An anatomy of a cartel. In G. Luft & A. Korin (Eds.), Energy security challenges for the 21st century. Santa Barbara: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalicki, J. H., David, L. G., Kalicki, J. H., & David, L. G. (2005). Introduction: The need to integrate energy and foreign policy. In J. H. Kalicki & D. L. Goldwyn (Eds.), Energy and security. Toward a new foreign policy strategy. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. D. (1994). The coming anarchy. How scarcity, crime, overpopulation, tribalism, and disease are rapidly destroying the social fabric of our planet. Boston, Mass: The Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony. Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner, E., & Berk, C. (2010). European energy security co-operation: Between amity and enmity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 859–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klare, M. (2001). Resource wars. New York: Owl Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, M. (2008). Rising powers, shrinking planet: The new geopolitics of energy (1st ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, M. (2009). There will be blood: Political violence, regional warfare, and the risk of great-power conflict over contested energy resources. In G. Luft & A. Korin (Eds.), Energy security challenges for the 21st century. Santa Barbara: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, W. L. (2010). Consumer country energy cooperation: The international energy agency and the global energy order. In A. Goldthau & J. M. Witte (Eds.), Global energy governance. The new rules of the game. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koknar, A. M. (2009). The epidemic of energy terrorism. In G. Luft (Ed.), Energy security challenges for the 21st century. Santa Barbara: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, J., & Kim, J. (2010). Export restrictions on strategic raw materials and their impact on trade. In OECD (Ed.), OECD Trade policy working papers, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostecka, D. J. (2011). Places and bases. The Chinese Navy’s emerging support network in the Indian Ocean. Naval War College Review, 64(1), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Kraenner, S. (2008). Energy security. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M., & Wübbeke, J. (2011) Explaining China’s peaceful road to energy security: An eclectic approach (Conference Presentation). Conference: Global resource conflicts. Political economy and transnational governance in the 20th century, Humboldt University, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, E. S. (2005). Strategic hedging and the future of Asia-Pacific stability. The Washington Quarterly, 29(1), 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D., & James, A. R. (2009). Introduction. The militarization of energy security. In D. Moran, J. A. Russell, & J. A. Russell (Eds.), Energy security and global politics. The militarization of resource management. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T. H. (2010). China’s strategy to secure natural resources: Risks, dangers, and opportunities. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among nations; the struggle for power and peace (1st ed.). New York: A. A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, E. L. (2011). Oil and unrest. Foreign Affairs March 2011: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67563/edward-l-morse/oil-and-unrest?page=show

  • National Research Council. (2007). Minerals, Critical Minerals, and the U.S. Economy. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivola, P., & Carter, E. E. R. (2010). Making sense of ’energy independence”. In C. Pascual & J. Elkind (Eds.), Energy security. Economics, politics, strategies, and implications. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirog, R. (2007). The role of national oil companies in the international oil market. In CRS report for congress, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selivanova, Y. (2010). Managing the patchwork of agreements in trade and investment. In A. Goldthau & J. M. Witte (Eds.), Global energy governance. The new rules of the game. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieminski, A. E. (2005). World energy futures. In J. H. Kalicki & D. L. Goldwyn (Eds.), Energy and security. Toward a new foreign policy strategy. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, M. R. (2005). Twilight in the desert: The coming Saudi oil shock and the world economy. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. (2011). Introduction. Defining, measuring, and exploring energy security. In B. Sovacool (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of energy security. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, P. (2007). “Failed” states and global security: Empirical questions and policy dilemmas. International Studies Review, 9(4), 644–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D., & Raphael, S. (2010). Global energy security and American hegemony. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tessmann, B., & Wolfe, W. (2011). Great power and strategic hedging: The case of Chinese energy security strategy. International Studies Review, 13(2), 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2010). The difference engine: More precious than gold. 2010/09/17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunsjø, Ø. (2010). Hedging against oil dependency: New perspectives on China’s energy security policy. International Relations, 24(1), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. (2005). 2005 Report to Congress. Edited by U. S.-C. E. a. S. R. Commission, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Energy. (2010). Critical materials strategy. edited by U. S. D. o. Energy. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environmental Programme. (2007). Sudan: Post-conflict environmental assessment. Nairobi: United Nations Environmental Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environmental Programme. (2009). From conflict to peacebuilding. Nairobi: The role of natural resources and the environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geographical Survey. (2011). Commodity statistics and information 2011. http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/. Accessed 7 Aug 2011.

  • Van der Linde, C., Mehdi Parvizi Amineh, Aad,C.,, & Dick De, S. (2004). Study on energy supply security and geopolitics. Clingendael International Energy Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D. G., & Yueh, L. (2010). The new energy order managing insecurities in the twenty-first century. Foreign Affairs, 89(1), 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics, Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization. (2011). China – Measures related to the exportation of various raw materials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin, D. (2006). Ensuring energy security. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R. (2009). Energy security. Europe’s new foreign policy challenge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, E. W. (1983). World resources and industries, the world economy. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jost Wübbeke M.A. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wübbeke, J. (2012). Three Worlds of Natural Resources and Power. In: Fels, E., Kremer, JF., Kronenberg, K. (eds) Power in the 21st Century. Global Power Shift. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25082-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics