Advertisement

Drones as Future Air Power Assets: The Dawn of Aviation 2.0?

  • Louis-Marie Clouet
Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

As the B-52 bomber and the ICBM were the symbols of the Cold War, the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is often prensented as an icon of military power at the beginning of the 21st Century. It epitomises a new way to wage war, as current operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan have put the spotlight on UAVs. Although largerly used by military forces – mainly U.S. and Israeli – since the Vietnam War, UAV acquired this renewed status very rapidly in the last decade, and is henceforth considered as a key asset for military and political leaders, a “force multiplier” and a deciding factor for a military, if not political, victory on the ground.

Keywords

Armed Force Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Unmanned Aircraft System Unmanned Aircraft Improvise Explosive Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bolkcom, C. (2006, June 5). Military suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD): Assessing future needs. Congressional Research Service, RS21141.Google Scholar
  2. Boutherin, G. (2010). Puissance aérospatiale et multidimensionnalité du champ de bataille. Quelques éléments sur les engagements de demain. Air and Space Power Journal Afrique & Francophonie, 1(4), 4–28. Winter 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Brustlein, C. (2011, July). Toward the end of force projection? I. The anti-access threat. Focus stratégique, 20 bis.Google Scholar
  4. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group. (2009, October 15). Unmanned aircraft systems, 2010–2050: Implications for the industrial base. CSIS Current Issues, 14.Google Scholar
  5. Clouet, L.-M. (2011). La prolifération des technologies aérospatiales russes et chinoises: Enjeux militaires, technologiques et industriels. In G. Boutherin & C. Grand (Eds.), Envol vers 2025: Réflexions prospectives sur la puissance aérospatiale. Paris: La documentation française.Google Scholar
  6. Clouet, L.-M., & Nardon, L. MALE drones: Europe’s options?. Note de l’Ifri, http://ifri.org/downloads/notecerfaespacedronesgb.pdf. Accessed July 2010.
  7. Cohen, E. (1994). The US Mystique of air power. Foreign Affairs, 73(1), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conference on “MALE drones: Challenges and European perspectives”, 7 April 2010 at Paris: Ifri.Google Scholar
  9. Congressional Budget Office. (2011, June). Policy options for unmanned aircraft systems. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Coquet, P. (2008, June). La notion de partage capacitaire en question. Focus stratégique, 8, Ifri.Google Scholar
  11. Curran, M. (Summer 2005). UAVs: A critical multiplier of current and future forces. RUSI Defence Systems, Royal United Services Institute.Google Scholar
  12. de Durand, E. (2003/2). “Révolution dans les affaires militaires” “Révolution”ou “transformation”?. Hérodote, 109, 57–70.Google Scholar
  13. de Durand, E. (2004/3). Le retour de la puissance aérienne. Hérodote, 114, 17–34.Google Scholar
  14. Desportes, V. (2009). Armées: ‘Technologisme’ ou ‘juste technologie’? [“Armies: ‘technologism’ or ‘just technology’?”]. Politique étrangère, 74(2), 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drew, C. (2010, January 11). Military is awash in data from drones. New York Times. Google Scholar
  16. Gorman, S., Dreazen, Y. J., & Cole, A. (2009, December 17). Insurgents Hack U.S. Drones. Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126102247889095011.html (consulted 17 July 2011).
  17. Grozel, M., & Moulard, G. (2008). Drones, mystérieux robots volants. Les yeux et le feu du XXIe siècle. Paris: Lavauzelle.Google Scholar
  18. Heyward, K. (2010, June). Unmanned aerial systems: A challenge to European industry?. RUSI Defence Systems, Royal United Services Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmann, M., & Weisberger, M. (2011, May 16). New UAV roles in DoD 30-year air plan. DefenseNews, 26(19).Google Scholar
  20. International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2009, May). The drones of war, IISS Strategic Comments, 15(04).Google Scholar
  21. Kapstein, E. B. (1994). America’s arms-trade monopoly: Lagging sales will starve lesser suppliers. Foreign Affairs, 73(3), 13–19. May–June.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kapstein, E. B. (2002). Allies and armaments. Survival, 44(2), 141–155. Summer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keeney, T., & Cohen E. (Ed.). (1993). Gulf war air power survey (GWAPS) Summary Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  24. Kimmey, P. (2010, February 18). Ravens, reapers, and robots: Unmanned vehicles and the military. Center for Strategic and International Studies (consulted 7 June 2011).Google Scholar
  25. Lambeth, B. S. (2000). The transformation of American air power. Ithaca: Cornel University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Luttwak, E. N. (2007). Les armements peuvent-ils devenir abordables? [“Can armaments become affordable?”]. Politique étrangère, 72(4), 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Page, L. (2009, February). Today’s question: What is value-for-money in defense acquisition?”. In The meaning of value for money, RUSI Defence Systems, London: RUSI.Google Scholar
  28. Paloméros, J.-P., & Joly, F. (2009, June 9). Drones en Afghanistan, la nécessaire complémentarité des vecteurs, Défense nationale et sécurité collective. 720.Google Scholar
  29. Quintana, E. Unmanned systems: Confusing ethics. RUSI commentary. http://www.rusi.org/analysis/commentary/ref:C4DAEB5DD10A7F/ (consulted July 15 2011).
  30. Ranquet, B. (2009). Défense de la technologie: Rendre à la technologie son importance dans le domaine militaire [“Defence of technology: Give the technology back its importance in military field”]. Revue internationale et stratégique, 76, 65–70. winter 2009–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, R. (2007). The utility of force: The art of war in modern world. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  32. Trévidic, B. (juillet 2011). Drones: la France choisit Dassault au détriment d’EADS. Les échos, 2223.Google Scholar
  33. U.S. Department of Defense. (2009). FY2009–2034 Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap, Washington, D.C, www.acq.osd.mil/psa/docs/UMSIntegratedRoadmap2009.pdf
  34. Vandewalle, Y., & Viollet, J.-C. (2009, December). Rapport d’information par la Commission de la Défense nationale et des Forces armées sur les drones, [Parliamentary report on UAVs by the National Defence and Armed Forces Commission]. 2127, Paris: Assemblée nationale.Google Scholar
  35. Wan, W., & Finn, P. (2011, July 4). Global race on to match U.S. drone capabilities. The Washington Post. Google Scholar
  36. Weiner, S. L. (2009). Evolution in the post-cold war air force: Technology, doctrine, and bureaucratic politics. In H. M. Sapolsky, B. H. Friedman, & B. R. Green (Eds.), US military innovation since the cold war. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Zucchino, D. (2010, February 21). Drone pilots have a front-row seat on war, from half a world away. Los Angeles Times.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis-Marie Clouet
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations