Power Shift? Power in International Relations and the Allegiance of Middle Powers

  • Enrico FelsEmail author
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)


Within the last two decades, China has been the most seriously debated emerging power seen by academics, politicians and large parts of the public alike to be able to effectively challenge the dominant position of the United States of America (US) in global as well as Asian-Pacific affairs. Indeed, after having enjoyed a brief moment of global unipolarity following the demise of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, Washington’s current situation has changed remarkably. Some points are particularly worthy to be mentioned. To begin with, the world’s former hyperpuissance (Hubert Védrine) has to recover from the worst global economic crisis since 1929. The US unemployment rate is up to almost 10% (far away from the 4% in 2000), its federal budget deficit is estimated to reach 1.4 trillion USD in 2011 (Younglai 2011) and total outstanding public debt skyrocketed to 14.7 trillion USD in September 2011 (US Treasury 2011). Secondly, the US continues to be heavily engaged in large military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The military missions in these two war-torn countries do not only continue to cost US tax payers much money and account for the death of hundreds of US soldiers and local civilians, but – more important from a strategic perspective – have bogged down the US military for some years to come. Finally, Washington is confronted with an increasingly assertive and economically rising China in Asia-Pacific, a region that according to high-ranking US politicians has “become more closely interlinked than ever before” (Obama 2009) with the fortune of America, “is a key driver for global economic growth” (Kirk 2009) and a place, “where much of the history of the 21st century will be written” (Clinton 2010).


International Relation Great Power International Affair Soft Power Card Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abeysinghe, T., & Lu, D. (2003). China as an economic powerhouse: Implications on its neighbors. China Economic Review, 14(1), 164–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amirov, V. B. (2010). Russia’s posture and policy towards Northeast Asia. In S. Blan (Ed.), Russia’s prospects in Asia (pp. 1–28). Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Aoi, C. (2004). Asserting civilian power or risking irrelevance. In S. N. Katada, H. W. Maull, & T. Inoguchi (Eds.), Global Governance. Germany and Japan in the international system (pp. 111–126). Aldershot & Burlington: Asgate.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Government. (2009). Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century. Force 2030. Defence White Paper, Commonwealth of Australia, 2009.
  5. Babbage, R. (2011). Australia’s strategic edge in 2030. Kokoda Papers, No. 15, February 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, D. A. (1985). Economic statecraft. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin, D. (2000). Power and international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Eds.), The handbook of international relations (pp. 177–191). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Buzan, B., & Waever, O. (2008). Regions and powers. The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, D. (1998). Why fight: Humanitarism, principles, and post-structuralism. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 21, 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, E. H. (1964). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919–1939. An introduction to the study of international relations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  11. Casetti, E. (2003). Power shifts and economic development: When will China overtake the USA? Journal of Peace Research, 40(6), 661–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CGS Forschungsgruppe Wissensmacht. (2011). Sind die BRIC-Staaten aufstrebende Wissensmächte? Herausforderungen für die deutsche Wissenspolitik. CGS-Discussion Paper, No. 3, January 2011.
  13. Chapnick, A. (1999). The middle power. Canadian Foreign Policy, 7(2), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chase-Dunn, C. (1989). Global formation: Structures of the world-economy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Christensen, C. (1978). Structural power and national security. In K. Knorr & F. N. Trager (Eds.), Economic issues and national security. Lawrence: Regents Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  16. Christensen, T. J. (2006). Fostering stability of creating a monster? The rise of China and U.S. policy toward East Asia. International Security, 31(1), 81–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clegg, S. R. (1994). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Cline, R. S. (1977). World power assessment. A calculus of strategic drift. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  19. Clinton, H. R. (2010). Speech of US Secretary of State at Honolulu, 28th Oct 2010.
  20. Cook, M., et al. (2010). Power and choice: Asian security futures. Report of the Lowy Institute for International Policy, 2010.
  21. Cooper, A. F., Higgott, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. Vancouver: UBS.Google Scholar
  22. Cox, R. W. (1989). Middlepowermanship, Japan, and the future world order. International Journal, 44(4), 822–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dahl, R. A. (1991). Modern political analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Danilovic, V. (2002). When the stakes are high. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  26. de Glazebrook, G. T. (1947). The middle powers in the United Nations system. International Organization, 1(2), 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deng, Y., & Moore, T. G. (2004). China views globalization: Toward a new great-power politics? The Washington Quarterly, 27(3), 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dewitt, D. B., & Kirton, J. (1983). Canada as a principal power. Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Dibb, P. (1986). Review of Australia’s defence capabilities. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  30. Digeser, P. (1992). The fourth face of power. Journal of Politics, 54, 977–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drysdale, P. (2010a). Preparing for the rise and rise of Asia. East Asia Forum, 19th July 2010a.
  32. Drysdale, P. (2010b). China and Japan in landmark shift in Asian economic power?. East Asia Forum, 6th Sept 2010b.
  33. Fawn, R. (2009). ‘Regions’ and their study: Wherefrom, what for and whereto? Review of International Studies, 35, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fels, E. (2009). Assessing Eurasia’s powerhouse: An inquiry into the nature of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. Bochum: Winkler.Google Scholar
  35. Fels, E. (2011a). Inde: Entre partenariat et concurrence avec l’Europe. In L.-M. Clouet & A. Marchetti (Eds.), L’Europe et le monde en 2020. Essai de prospective franco-allemande (pp. 129–144). Villeneuve d’Ascq: Septentrion.Google Scholar
  36. Fels, E. (2011b). Middle power allegiance and power shift in Asian-Pacific security affairs – the case of Australia. In Paper presented at 52nd Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Montreal (Canada).Google Scholar
  37. Friedberg, A. L. (2005). The future of U.S.-China relations. Is conflict inevitable? International Security, 30(2), 7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gaullier, G., Lemoine, F., & Ünal-Kesenci, D. (2007). China’s emergence and the reorganisation of trade flows in Asia. China Economic Review, 18(2), 209–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gelb, L. H. (2009). Power rules. How common sense can rescue American foreign policy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  40. Gelber, L. (1946). Canada’s new stature. Foreign Affairs, 24(2), 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gill, B. (2007). Rising star – China’s new security diplomacy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  42. Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goh, E. (2004). The US-China relationship and Asia-Pacific security: Negotiating change. Asian Security, 1(3), 216–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gu, X. (2010). Soft, hard and structural power and global power shift. ZEI discussion paper, No. 198, 2010.Google Scholar
  45. Guizzini, S. (2000). The use and misuse of power analysis in international relations. In R. Palan (Ed.), Global political economy: Contemporary theories (pp. 55–67). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Hatch, T. (2009). Japan, the middle power. Why it’s acting like smaller states, Newsweek, 3 rd Oct 2009.
  47. Heinrichs, R. (2011). Relying on a great power for defence is foolhardy, Canberra Times, 19th Feb 2011, p. 23.Google Scholar
  48. Holbraad, C. (1984). Middle powers in international politics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Huntington, S. (1999). The lonely superpower. Foreign Affairs, 78(2), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). (2010). The military balance 2010.Google Scholar
  51. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2011). World economic outlook tensions from the two-speed recovery: Unemployment, commodities, and capital flows. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  52. Kelly, P. (2010). US debt a threat to security. The Australian, 17th July 2010.Google Scholar
  53. Keohane, R. O. (1969). Liliputians’ dilemmas: Small states in international politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Keohane, R. O. (1986). Theory of world politics: Structural neorealism and beyond. In R. O. Keohane (Ed.), Neorealism and its critics (pp. 158–202). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Kirk, R. (2009). Speech of US Trade Representative Ambassador at the US-Korea Business Council, 5th November 2009.
  56. Krasner, S. (1985). Structural conflict: The third world against global liberalism. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kugler, J., & Arbetman, M. (1989). Choosing among measures of power: A review of the empirical record. In R. J. Stoll & M. D. Ward (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 49–77). Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  58. Kugler, J., & Tammen, R. L. (2004). Regional challenge: China’s rise to power. In J. Rolfe (Ed.), The Asia-Pacific: A region in transition (pp. 33–53). Honolulu: Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  59. Lebel, L. (2006). Reflections on power. USER Weekly Research Updates No. 125. Unit for Social Environmental Research, Chiang Mai.
  60. Levin, M. L. (2008). The next great clash – China and Russia vs. the United States. Westport (Connecticut)/London: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  61. Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Lyon, P. V., & Tomlin, B. W. (1979). Canada as an international actor. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Mattern, J. B. (2008). The concept of power and the (un)discipline of International Relations. In C. Reus-Smit & D. Snidal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international relations (pp. 691–698). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Maull, H. W. (1990). Germany and Japan: The new civilian powers. Foreign Affairs, 69(5), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mayer, M. (2011). Chine: l’affirmation d’une puissance. In L.-M. Clouet & A. Marchetti (Eds.), L’Europe et le monde en 2020. Essai de prospective franco-allemande (pp. 129–144). Paris: Septentrion.Google Scholar
  66. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  67. Medeiros, E. S. (2005). Strategic hedging and the future of Asia-Pacific stability. The Washington Quarterly, 29(1), 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Merrit, R. L., & Zinnes, D. A. (1989). Alternative indexes of national power. In R. J. Stoll & M. D. Ward (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 11–28). Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  69. Morgenthau, H. J. (1954). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  70. Nation, R. C. (2010). Russia in East Asia: Aspirations and limitations. In S. Blank (Ed.), Russia’s prospects in Asia (pp. 29–62). Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  71. National Priorities Project. (2011). Cost of war to the United States. September 2011.
  72. Neack, L. (1995). Linking state type with foreign policy behaviour. In L. Neack et al. (Eds.), Foreign policy analysis: Continuity and change in its second generation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  73. Nolte, D. (2006). Macht und Machthierarchien in den internationalen Beziehungen. Ein Analysekonzept für die Forschung über regionale Führungsmächte. Working Paper at the German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), No. 29.
  74. Nolte, D. (2007). How to compare regional powers: Analytical concepts and research topics. In Paper prepared for delivery at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Helsinki, 7–12th May 2007.Google Scholar
  75. Noya, J. (2005). The symbolic power of nation. Working Paper at the Real Instituto Elcano de Estudios Internacionales y Estratégicos, No. 35.
  76. Nye, J. S. (1990a). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  77. Nye, J. S. (1990b). Soft power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  79. Obama, B. (2009). Speech of US President at Suntory Hall (Tokyo, Japan), 14th November 2009.
  80. Office of the Secretary of Defence. (2010). Military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. Annual report to Congress.
  81. Power, J. (2005). The so-called rise of China – Asia’s power game. International Herald Tribune, 8 April 2005.
  82. Pratt, C. (1990). Has middle power internationalism a future? In C. Pratt (Ed.), Middle power internationalism: The north south dimension. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Riddell, R. G. (1948). The Role of Middle Powers in the United Nations, Statements and Speeches, Canadian Department of External Affairs, 48, 40 Google Scholar
  84. RIA N. (2010). Medvedev concerned by falling population numbers in Russia’s Far East, news report, 3rd July 2010.
  85. Ross, R. S. (2006). Balance of power politics and the rise of China: Accommodation and balancing in East Asia. Security Studies, 15(3), 355–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rozman, G. (2010). Russian repositioning in Northeast Asia: Putin’s impact and current prospects. In S. Blank (Ed.), Russia’s prospects in Asia (pp. 63–96). Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  87. Samuels, R. J. (2007). Securing Japan: The current discourse. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 33(1), 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Scholvin, S. (2011). Emerging non-OECD countries: Global shifts in power and geopolitical regionalization. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 6(1), 19–43.Google Scholar
  89. Schörnig, N. (2010). The roo and the dragon. Australia's foreign policy towards China during the Rudd era. PRIF Report, No. 99, Frankfurt/M., 2010.
  90. Shambaugh, D. (2004/05). China Engages Asia – Reshaping the regional order. International Security, 29(3), 64–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Shambaugh, D. (Ed.). (2005). Power shift – China and Asia’s new dynamics. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  92. Sprout, H., & Sprout, M. (1965). The ecological perspective on human affairs: With special reference to international politics. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  93. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2011). Explanation of the TIV tables.
  94. Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  95. Strange, S. (1989). Toward a theory of transnational empire. In E.-O. Czempiel & J. N. Rosenau (Eds.), Global changes and theoretical challenges: Approaches for the world politics of the 1990s (pp. 161–176). Massachusetts/Toronto: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  96. Taber, C. S. (1989). Power capability indexes in the third world. In R. J. Stoll & M. D. Ward (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 29–48). Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  97. Tellis, A., et al. (2000). Measuring national power in the postindustrial age. Analyst’s handbook. RAND Corporation report.
  98. Treverton, G. F., Jones, S. G. (2005). Measuring national power. RAND Corporation report.
  99. United Nations (UN). (2011). Regional and national trends in the human development index 1970–2010.
  100. US Treasury. (2011). The daily history of the debt results, Result for 2nd September 2011.
  101. Vaughn, B., Morrison, W. M. (2006). China–Southeast Asia relations: Trends, issues, and implications for the United States. Congressional research service report for Congress, 4 April 2006.
  102. Virmani, A. (2005). Global power from the 18th to 21st century: Power potential (VIP2), strategic asses & actual power (VIP). In Working paper at the Indian Council for research on international economic relations, No. 175, Nov 2005.Google Scholar
  103. Wagener, M. (2010). The US military presence and the future of security partnerships, paper presented at the 5th Berlin Conference on Asian Security (BCAS), organized by Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP, Berlin), German Federal Ministry of Defences and Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS, Jakarta), Oct 2010, p. 6.
  104. Wagener, M. (2011). Die aufgeschobene Konfrontation: Warum die USA mit China (noch) kooperieren. In Internationale Politik, Nr. 2 (pp. 112–119).Google Scholar
  105. Wallerstein, I. (1986). Walter Rodney: The historian as a spokesperson for historical forces. American Ethnologist, 12(2), 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  107. Waltz, K. N. (1986). Reflections on theory of international politics: A response to my critics. In R. O. Keohane (Ed.), Neorealism and its critics (pp. 322–346). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Waltz, K. N. (1993). The emerging structure of international politics. International Security, 18(2), 44–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  110. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. White, H. (2005). The limits of optimism: Australia and the rise of China. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 59(4), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. White, H. (2010). Power shift: Australia’s future between Washington and Beijing. Quarterly Essay, 39, 1–74.Google Scholar
  113. Wight, M. (1978). Power politics. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Wikileaks. (2011a). Cable 77562, 9/8/2006 6:10, 06CANBERRA1366.Google Scholar
  115. Wikileaks. (2011b). Cable EO 12958, 28/03/2009 02:24, STATE 030049.Google Scholar
  116. Wood, B. (1988). The middle powers and the general interest. Ottawa: The North–South Institute.Google Scholar
  117. Wrong, D. H. (1979). Power. Its forms, bases and uses. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  118. Yoshihide, S. (2009). Comments at the 2009 Japan-US future leaders policy dialogue.
  119. Younglai, R. (2011). Economist list US budget deficit as No. 1 worry. Reuters, 28th Feb 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Global StudiesUniversity of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations