Advertisement

Introduction

Chapter
  • 518 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

Tropical cyclones (TCs) are of the most extreme and dangerous weather phenomena on Earth. In the United States, landfalling TCs account for an average of $10 billion in damages annually [50].

Keywords

Vertical Wind Shear Dangerous Weather Phenomenon Dvorak Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bengtsson L, Böttger H, Kanamitsu M (1982) Simulation of hurricane-type vortices in a general circulation model. Tellus A 34:440–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bengtsson L, Hodges K, Esch M, Keenlyside N, Kornblueh L, Luo J-J, Yamagata T (2007) How may tropical cyclones change in a warmer climate? Tellus A 59:539–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bessafi M, Wheeler M (2006) Modulation of South Indian Ocean tropical cyclones by the Madden-Julian oscillation and convectively coupled equatorial waves. Mon Weather Rev 134:638–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broccoli A, Manabe S (1990) Can existing climate models be used to study anthropogenic changes in tropical cyclone climate? Geophys Res Lett 17:1917–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan JCL (1985) Tropical cyclone activity in the Northwest Pacific in relation to the El Nino/Southern Oscillation phenomenon. Mon Weather Rev 113:599–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan JCL (2006) Comment on “Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment”. Science 311:1713b–1713bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan JCL (2008) Decadal variations of intense typhoon occurrence in the western North Pacific. Proc R Soc A 464:249–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chan JCL, Xu M (2009) Inter-annual and inter-decadal variations of landfalling tropical cyclones in East Asia. Part I: time series analysis. Int J Climatol 29:1285–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang E, Guo Y (2007) Is the number of North Atlantic tropical cyclones significantly underestimated prior to the availability of satellite observations? Geophys Res Lett 34:L14801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chauvin F, Royer J-F, Déqué M (2006) Response of hurricane-type vortices to global warming as simulated by ARPEGE-Climate at high resolution. Clim Dyn. 27:377–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis C, Wang W, Dudhia J, Torn R (2010) Does increased horizontal resolution improve hurricane wind forecasts? Weather Forcast 25:1826–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dvorak V (1984) Tropical cyclone intensity analysis using satellite data. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS 11, p 47Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elsner J, Kossin J, Jagger T (2008) The increasing intensity of the strongest tropical cyclones. Nature 455:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Emanuel K (1988) The maximum intensity of hurricanes. J Atmos Sci 45:1143–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Emanuel K (2005) Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature 436:686–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gillet N, Scott P, Santer B (2008) Attribution of cyclogenesis region sea surface temperature change to anthropogenic influence. Geophys Res Lett 35:L09707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldenberg S, Landsea C, Mestas-Nuñez A, Gray W (2001) The recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity: causes and implications. Science 293:474–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gray W (1968) Global view of the origin of tropical disturbances and storms. Mon Weather Rev 96(10):669–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gray W (1984) Atlantic seasonal hurricane frequency. Part I: El Nino and 30 mb quasi-biennial oscillation influences. Mon Weather Rev 112:1649–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall J, Matthews A, Karoly D (2001) The modulation of tropical cyclone activity in the Australian region by the Madden-Julian oscillation. Mon Weather Rev 129:2970–2982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holland G (1997) The maximum potential intensity of tropical cyclones. J Atmos Sci 54:2519–2541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holland G (2007) Misuse of landfall as a proxy for Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. EOS Trans 88:349–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holland G, Webster P (2007) Heightened tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic: natural variability or climate trend? Philos Trans A 365:2695–2716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holland G (2008) A revised hurricane pressure–wind model. Mon Weather Rev 136:3432–3445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holland G, Done J, Bruyere C, Cooper C, Suzuki-Parker A (2010) Model investigation of the effects of climate variability and change on future Gulf of Mexico tropical cyclone activity. OTC Metocean 2010, p 13Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoyos C, Agudelo P, Webster P, Curry J (2005) Deconvolution of the factors contributing to the increase in global hurricane intensity. Science 312:94–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim H-M, Webster P, Curry J (2009) Impact of shifting patterns of Pacific ocean warming on North Atlantic tropical cyclones. Science 325(5936):77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Knapp K, Kruk M (2009) Quantifying inter-agency differences in tropical cyclone best track wind speed estimates. Mon Weather Rev 138:1459–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Knapp K, Kruk M, Levinson D, Diamond H, Neumann C (2010) The international best track archive for climate stewardship (IBTrACS). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Knutson T, Manabe S (1995) Time-mean response over the tropical Pacific to increased CO2 in a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. J Clim 8:2181–2199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Knutson T, Tuleya R, Kurihara Y (1998) Simulated increase of hurricane intensities in a CO2-warmed climate. Science 279:1018–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Knutson T, Sirutis J, Garner S, Held I (2007) Simulation of the recent multidecadal increase of Atlantic hurricane activity using an 18-km-grid regional model. Bull Am Soc 88:1549–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Knutson T, Sirutis J, Garner S, Vecchi G, Held I (2008) Simulated reduction in Atlantic hurricane frequency under twenty-first-century warming conditions. Nat Geosci 1:359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kossin J, Valden C (2004) A pronounced bias in tropical cyclone minimum sea level pressure estimation based on the Dvorak technique. Mon Weather Rev 132(1):165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kossin J, Vimont J (2007) A more general framework for understanding Atlantic hurricane variability and trends. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88(11):1767–1781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Landman W, Seth A, Camargo S (2005) The effect of regional climate model domain choice on the simulation of tropical cyclone-like vortices in the Southwestern Indian ocean. J Clim 18(8):1263–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Landsea C (2007) Counting Atlantic tropical cyclones back to 1900. EOS Trans 88(18):197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liebmann B, Hendon H, Glick J (1994) The relationship between tropical cyclones of the western Pacific and Indian oceans and the Madden-Julian oscillation. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 72(41):401–412Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lighthill J, Holland G, Gray W, Landsea C, Craig G, Evans J, Kurihara Y, Guard C (1994) Global climate change and tropical cyclones. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 75(11):2147–2157Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu K, Chan JCL (2008) Interdecadal variability of western North Pacific tropical cyclone tracks. J Clim 21(17):4464–4476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maddan RA, Julian PR (1972) Description of global-scale circulation cells in the tropics with a 40–50 day period. J Atmos Sci 29:1109–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Maloney ED, Hartmann DL (2000) Modulation of eastern north Pacific hurricanes by the Madden-Julian oscillation. J Clim 13:1451–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maloney ED, Hartmann DL (2000) Modulation of hurricane activity in the Gulf of Mexico by the Madden-Julian oscillation. Science 287(5460):2002–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Manabe S, Holloway J Jr, Stone H (1970) Tropical circulation in a time-integration of a global model of the atmosphere. J Atmos Sci 27:580–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mann M, Emanuel K (2006) Atlantic hurricane trends linked to climate change. EOS Trans 87(24):233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McBride J (1984) Comments on “Simulation of hurricane-type vortices in a general circulation model”. Tellus A 36(1):92–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Murakami H, Sugi M (2010) Effect of model resolution on tropical cyclone climate projections. SOLA 6:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Murakami H, Wang B (2010) Future change of North atlantic tropical cyclone tracks: projection by a 20-km-mesh global atmospheric model. J Clim 23:1699–2721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Oouchi K, Yoshimura J, Yoshimura H, Mizuta R, Kusunoki S, Noda A (2006) Tropical cyclone climatology in a global-warming climate as simulated in a 20 km-mesh global atmosphere model: frequency and wind intensity analysis. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 84(2):259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pielke R Jr, Gratz J, Landsea C, Collins D, Saunders M, Musulin R (2008) Normalized hurricane damage in the United States: 1900–2005. Nat Haz Rev 9(1):29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Saunders M, Lea A (2008) Large contribution of sea surface warming to recent increase in Atlantic hurricane activity. Nature 451(7178):557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sugi M, Murakami H, Yoshimura J (2009) A reduction in global tropical cyclone frequency due to global warming. SOLA 5:164–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Swanson K (2008) Nonlocality of Atlantic tropical cyclone intensities. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 9 doi: 10.1029/2007GC001844
  54. 54.
    Tsutsui J (2002) Implication of anthropogenic climate change for tropical cyclone activity: a case study with the NCAR CCM2. J. Meteorol Soc Jpn 80(1):45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vecchi G, Solden B (2007) Effect of remote sea surface temperature change on tropical cyclone potential intensity. Nature 450(7172):1066–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vecchi G, Swanson K, Soden B (2008) Whither hurricane activity. Science 322(5902):687–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vecchi G, Knutson T (2008) On estimates of historical North Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. J Clim 21(14):3580–3600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Villarini G, Vecchi G, Knutson T, Zhao M, Smith J (2011) North Atlantic tropical storm frequency response to anthropogenic forcing: projections and sources of uncertainty. J Clim doi: 10.1175/2011JCL13853.1
  59. 59.
    Walsh K, Nguyen K–C, McGregor J (2004) Fine-resolution regional climate model simulations of the impact of climate change on tropical cyclones near Australia. Clim Dyn 22(1):47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Walsh K, Fiorino M, Landsea C, McInnes K (2007) Objectively determined resolution-dependent threshold criteria for the detection of tropical cyclones in climate models and reanalysis. J Clim 20(10):2307–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Webster P, Holland G, Curry J, Chang H (2005) Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309:1844–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wu M-C, Yeung K-H, Chang W-L (2006) Trends in western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity. EOS Trans 87(48):537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wu L, Tao L, Ding Q (2010) Influence of sea surface warming on environmental factors affecting long-term changes of Atlantic tropical cyclone formation. J Clim 23(22):5978–5989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Zhang R, Delworth TL (2009) A new model for attributing climate variations over the Atlantic hurricane basin’s main development region. Geophys Res Lett 36:L06701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhao M, Held I, Lin S-L, Vecchi G (2009) Simulations of global hurricane climatology, interannual variability, and response to global warming using a 50-km resolution GCM. J Clim 22(24):6653–6678CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Earth Atmospheric SciencesGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations