Skip to main content

Is Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery the Gold Standard?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer
  • 980 Accesses

Abstract

The last two decades have seen a gradual but shifting enthusiasm for laparoscopic general surgery. A better appreciation of the laparoscopic approach with adaptation of open surgical techniques and improvements in instrumentation has helped this transition. A realization of the patient benefits that can be gained from laparoscopic surgery in benign disease has increased interest in its application in cancer surgery. Colorectal surgery, by its very nature, is challenging for the laparoscopic approach, involving multi-quadrant dissection, manipulation of bulky tissues and a dependency on assistants for retraction. In rectal cancer, the situation is made more difficult by the confines of the bony pelvis, the proximity of vital structures and the precision demanded to achieve complete tumour resection with an intact mesorectum and preservation of pelvic autonomic nerves. For colon cancer, there has been a general recognition for some time that laparoscopic surgery can produce oncological outcomes at least equivalent to open surgery, but with the added advantages of quicker patient recovery and shorter hospital stay. In this chapter, we will explore the evolution of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, with particular emphasis on rectal cancer, and ask whether laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery has acquired the same acceptance as colon cancer to become the new ‘gold standard’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Centre for Clinical Excellence (2000) Technology Appraisal Guidance No 17: Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. www.nice.org.uk. Accessed March 2012

  2. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term end-points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM, for the Medical Research Council Con­ventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Trial Group (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guiloou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92:1124–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. (2006) NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance 105: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. www.nice.org.uk/TA105. Accessed March 2012

  7. LAPCO: National Training Programme in Laparo­scopic Colorectal Surgery. www.lapco.nhs.uk. Acces­sed March 2012

  8. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayatha S, Paraskeva P, Darzi AW, Heriot AG (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13:413–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson C, Uman G, Pigazzi A (2008) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Cancer Surg 34:1135–1142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jayne DG, Thorpe H, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Jayne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jayne, D., Khan, L. (2012). Is Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery the Gold Standard?. In: Valentini, V., Schmoll, HJ., van de Velde, C. (eds) Multidisciplinary Management of Rectal Cancer. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25005-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25005-7_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25004-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25005-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics