Skip to main content

Computational Technique of Learning Progress Motivation: Diagnosis of Learning and Innovation Status

  • Conference paper
Book cover Theoretical and Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (ICTMF 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 164))

  • 1941 Accesses

Abstract

Learning Progress Motivation (LPM) was developed to intrinsically incent organizational members adapting both exploratory and exploitative learning in innovation processes. LPM was applied on 103 engineers in the experiments which simulated innovation contexts. The computational technique of LPM was developed to dynamically transform learning records to a Learning Progress Characteristic (LPC) curve at real-time base. Through analyzing LPC curve, LPM four-phase cycles and the steady-state condition of LPM innovation process were identified. Engineers are motivated intrinsically and continuously by LPM to pursue maximal learning progress. The learning progress, innovation performance, and steady-state condition can be diagnosed by interpreting LPC curve. Therefore, the visual aided LPC curve is a user-friendly tool for managerial leaders of organizations in diagnosing learning and innovation status in innovation processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1), 71–87 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Oke, A., Munshi, N., Walumbwa, F.O.: The influence of leadership on innovation processes and activities. Organizational Dynamics 38(1), 64–72 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benner, M., Tushman, M.L.: Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28, 238–256 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jansen, J.J.P., Vera, D., Crossan, M.: Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly 20, 5–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. He, Z.L., Wong, P.K.: Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 15, 481–494 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J.: The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47, 209–226 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Reilly, C.A., Tushman, M.L.: The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review 82(4), 74–81 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tushman, M.L., O’Reilly, C.A.: Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38, 8–30 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidhuber, J.: Curious model-building control system. In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 2, IEEE Press, Singapore (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crossan, M., Vera, D., Nanjad, L.: Transcendent leadership: Strategic leadership in dynamic environments. The Leadership Quarterly 19, 569–581 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan, F., Oudeyer, P.Y.: Maximizing learning progress: An internal reward system for development. Embodied Artificial Intelligence 3139, 259–270 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oudeyer, P.Y., Kaplan, F., Hafner, V.V.: Intrinsic motivation systems for autonomous mental development. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 11(2), 265–286 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barto, A., Singh, S., Chentanez, N.: Intrinsically motivated learning of hierarchical collections of skills. In: 3rd International Conference on Development Learn, San Diego, CA, pp. 112–119 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Igari, I., Tani, J.: Incremental learning of sequence patterns with a modular network model. Neurocomputing 72(7–9), 1910–1919 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oudeyer, P.Y., Kaplan, F.: Discovering communication. Connection Science 18(2), 189–206 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Takamukua, S., Arkinb, R.C.: Multi-method learning and assimilation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 55(8), 618–627 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hsu, PS., Chang, TJ. (2011). Computational Technique of Learning Progress Motivation: Diagnosis of Learning and Innovation Status. In: Zhou, Q. (eds) Theoretical and Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science. ICTMF 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 164. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24999-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24999-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24998-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24999-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics