Skip to main content

Risk-Averse Production Planning

  • Conference paper
Book cover Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6992))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1065 Accesses

Abstract

We consider a production planning problem under uncertainty in which companies have to make product allocation decisions such that the risk of failing regulatory inspections of sites - and consequently losing revenue - is minimized. In the proposed decision model the regulatory authority is an adversary. The outcome of an inspection is a Bernoulli-distributed random variable whose parameter is a function of production decisions. Our goal is to optimize the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of the uncertain revenue. The dependence of the probability of inspection outcome scenarios on production decisions makes the CVaR optimization problem non-convex. We give a mixed-integer nonlinear formulation and devise a branch-and-bound (BnB) algorithm to solve it exactly. We then compare against a Stochastic Constraint Programming (SCP) approach which applies randomized local search. While the BnB guarantees optimality, it can only solve smaller instances in a reasonable time and the SCP approach outperforms it for larger instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Facts about current good manufacturing practices (cGMPs), U.S. Food and Drug Administration, http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/Manufacturing/ucm169105.htm

  2. Abrams, C., von Kanel, J., Muller, S., Pfitzmann, B., Ruschka-Taylor, S.: Optimized Enterprise Risk Management. IBM Systems Journal 46(2), 219–234 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beroggi, G.E.G., Wallace, W.A.: Operational Risk Management: A New Paradigm for Decision Making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cypernetics 24(10), 1450–1457 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McNeil, A.J., Frey, R., Embrechts, P.: Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Liebenbergm, A.P., Hoyt, R.E.: The Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence From the Appointment of Chief Risk Officers. Risk Management and Insurance Review 6, 37–52 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frigo, M.L., Anderson, R.J.: A Strategic Framework for Governance, Risk, and Compliance. Strategic Finance 44, 20–61 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen, M.: Corporate Integrity: Strategic Direction for GRC, 2008 GRC Drivers, Trends, and Market Directions (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bamberger, K.A.: Technologies of Compliance: Risk and Regulation in a Digital Age. Texas Law Review 88, 670–739 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elisseeff, A., Pellet, J.-P., Pratsini, E.: Causal Networks for Risk and Compliance: Methodology and Applications. IBM Journal of Research and Development 54(3), 6:1–6:12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pratsini, E., Dea, D.: Regulatory Compliance of Pharmaceutical Supply Chains. In: ERCIM News, no. 60

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muller, S., Supatgiat, C.: A Quantitative Optimization Model for Dynamic risk-based Compliance Management. IBM Journal of Research and Development 51, 295–307 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Silver, E.A., Pyke, D.F., Peterson, R.: Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling, 3rd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graves, S.C.: Manufacturing Planning and Control. In: Resende, M., Paradalos, P. (eds.) Handbook of Applied Optimization, pp. 728–746. Oxford University Press, NY (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mula, J., Poler, R., Garcia-Sabater, J.P., Lario, F.C.: Models for Production Planning Under Uncertainty: A Review. International Journal of Production Economics 103, 271–285 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Laumanns, M., Pratsini, E., Prestwich, S., Tiseanu, C.-S.: Production Planning for Pharmaceutical Companies Under Non-Compliance Risk (submitted) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Acerbi, C.: Coherent Measures of Risk in Everday Market Practice. Quantitative Finance 7(4), 359–364 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Acerbi, C., Tasche, D.: Expected shortfall: A Natural Coherent Alternative to Value at Risk. Economic Notes 31(2), 379–388 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alexander, G.J., Baptista, A.M.: A Comparison of VaR and CVaR Constraints on Portfolio Selection with the Mean-Variance Model. Management Science 50(9), 1261–1273 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D.: Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance 3, 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.P.: Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. The Journal of Risk 2, 21–41 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.P.: Conditional Value-at-Rsk for a General Loss Distribtion. Journal of Banking and finance 26, 1443–1471 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walsh, T.: Stochastic Constraint Programming. In: 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Belotti, P., Lee, J., Liberti, L., Margot, F., Wachter, A.: Branching and Bounds Tightening Techniques, for Non-Convex MINLP. Optimization Methods and Software 24(4-5), 597–634 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Clausen, J.: Branch and Bound Algorithms - Principles and Examples. Parallel Computing in Optimization (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gendron, B., Crainic, T.G.: Parallel Branch-And-Bound Algorithms: Survey and Synthesis. Operations Research 42(6), 1042–1066 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Prestwich, S.D., Tarim, S.A., Rossi, R., Hnich, B.: Evolving Parameterised Policies for Stochastic Constraint Programming. In: Gent, I.P. (ed.) CP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5732, pp. 684–691. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Prestwich, S.D., Tarim, S.A., Rossi, R., Hnich, B.: Stochastic Constraint Programming by Neuroevolution With Filtering. In: Lodi, A., Milano, M., Toth, P. (eds.) CPAIOR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6140, pp. 282–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Craenen, B., Eiben, A.E., Marchiori, E.: How to Handle Constraints with Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Chambers, L. (ed.) Practical Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, pp. 341–361 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kawas, B., Laumanns, M., Pratsini, E., Prestwich, S. (2011). Risk-Averse Production Planning. In: Brafman, R.I., Roberts, F.S., Tsoukiàs, A. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6992. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24873-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24872-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24873-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics