Skip to main content

Random Bimatrix Games Are Asymptotically Easy to Solve (A Simple Proof)

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6982))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We focus on the problem of computing approximate Nash equilibria and well-supported approximate Nash equilibria in random bimatrix games, where each player’s payoffs are bounded and independent random variables, not necessarily identically distributed, but with common expectations. We show that the completely mixed uniform strategy profile, i.e. the combination of mixed strategies (one per player) where each player plays with equal probability each one of her available pure strategies, is with high probability a \(\sqrt{\frac{\ln n}{n}}\)-Nash equilibrium and a \(\sqrt{\frac{3\ln n}{n}}\)-well supported Nash equilibrium, where n is the number of pure strategies available to each player. This asserts that the completely mixed, uniform strategy profile is an almost Nash equilibrium for random bimatrix games, since it is, with high probability, an ε-well-supported Nash equilibrium where ε tends to zero as n tends to infinity.

This work has been partially supported by the European Union under contract numbers ICT-2008-215270 (FRONTS), ICT-2009-5-257782 (ABC4Trust), and ERC/StG-210743 (RIMACO).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althöfer, I.: On sparse approximations to randomized strategies and convex combinations. Linear Algebra and Applications 199, 339–355 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bárány, I., Vempala, S., Vetta, A.: Nash equilibria in random games. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2005), pp. 123–131 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, X., Deng, X.: Settling the complexity of 2-player Nash-equilibrium. In: Proceedings of the 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2006 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, X., Deng, X., Teng, S.-H.: Computing Nash equilibria: Approximation and smoothed complexity. In: Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, ECCC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daskalakis, C., Goldberg, P., Papadimitriou, C.: The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2006), pp. 71–78 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daskalakis, C., Papadimitriou, C.: Three-player games are hard. In: Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, ECCC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg, P., Papadimitriou, C.: Reducibility among equilibrium problems. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2006), pp. 61–70 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoeffding, W.: Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 13–30 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemke, C.E.: Bimatrix equilibrium points and mathematical programming. Management Science 11, 681–689 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemke, C.E., Howson, J.T.: Equilibrium points of bimatrix games. J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 12, 413–423 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mehta, A.: Playing large games using simple startegies. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 2003), pp. 36–41 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nash, J.: Noncooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54, 289–295 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papadimitriou, C.H.: On inefficient proofs of existence and complexity classes. In: Proceedings of the 4th Czechoslovakian Symposium on Combinatorics (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Savani, R., von Stengel, B.: Exponentially many steps for finding a nash equilibrium in a bimatrix game. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2004), pp. 258–267 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsaknakis, H., Spirakis, P.G.: An optimization approach for approximate Nash equilibria. In: Deng, X., Graham, F.C. (eds.) WINE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4858, pp. 42–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Panagopoulou, P.N., Spirakis, P.G. (2011). Random Bimatrix Games Are Asymptotically Easy to Solve (A Simple Proof). In: Persiano, G. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6982. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24829-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24829-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24828-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24829-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics