Skip to main content

The Weakest Failure Detector to Implement a Register in Asynchronous Systems with Hybrid Communication

  • Conference paper
Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems (SSS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6976))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper introduces an asynchronous crash-prone hybrid system model. The system is hybrid in the way the processes can communicate. On the one side, a process can send messages to any other process. On another side, the processes are partitioned into clusters and each cluster has its own read/write shared memory. In addition to the model, a main contribution of the paper concerns the implementation of an atomic register in this system model. More precisely, a new failure detector (denoted MΣ) is introduced and it is shown that, when considering the information on failures needed to implement a register, this failure detector is the weakest. To that end, the paper presents an MΣ-based algorithm that builds a register in the considered hybrid system model and shows that it is possible to extract MΣ from any failure detector-based algorithm that implements a register in this model. The paper also (a) shows that MΣ is strictly weaker than Σ (which is the weakest failure detector to implement a register in a classical message-passing system) and (b) presents a necessary and sufficient condition to implement MΣ in a hybrid communication system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attiya, H., Bar-Noy, A., Dolev, D.: Sharing Memory Robustly in Message Passing Systems. Journal of the ACM 42(1), 121–132 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Attiya, H., Welch, J.: Distributed Computing: Fundamentals, Simulations and Advanced Topics, 2nd edn., 414 pages. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonnet, F., Raynal, M.: A Simple Proof of the Necessity of the Failure Detector Σ to Implement an Atomic Register in Asynchronous Message-passing Systems. Information Processing Letters 110(4), 153–157 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandra, T., Hadzilacos, V., Toueg, S.: The Weakest Failure Detector for Solving Consensus. Journal of the ACM 43(4), 685–722 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra, T., Toueg, S.: Unreliable Failure Detectors for Reliable Distributed Systems. Journal of the ACM 43(2), 225–267 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R.: Tight Failure Detection Bounds on Atomic Object Implementations. Journal of the ACM 57(4) Article 22, 32 pages (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gifford, D.K.: Weighted Voting for Replicated Data. In: Proc. 7th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles (SOSP 1979), pp. 150–172. ACM Press, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herlihy, M.P.: Wait-Free Synchronization. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 13(1), 124–149 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Herlihy, M.P., Wing, J.L.: Linearizability: a Correctness Condition for Concurrent Objects. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 12(3), 463–492 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Imbs, D., Raynal, M.: The Weakest Failure Detector to Implement a Register in Asynchronous Systems with H ybrid Communication. Tech Report #1792, 11 pages, IRISA, Université de Rennes, France (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamport, L.: On Interprocess communication. Part I: Formalism. Part II: Algorithms. Distributed Computing 1-2(2), 87–103 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lynch, N.A.: Distributed Algorithms, 872 pages. Morgan Kaufmann Pub, San Francisco (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Raynal, M.: Communication and Agreement Abstractions for Fault-Tolerant Asynchronous Distributed Systems, 251 pages. Morgan & Claypool Pub (2010) ISBN 978-1-60845-293-4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Imbs, D., Raynal, M. (2011). The Weakest Failure Detector to Implement a Register in Asynchronous Systems with Hybrid Communication. In: Défago, X., Petit, F., Villain, V. (eds) Stabilization, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems. SSS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6976. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24550-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24550-3_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24549-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24550-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics