Skip to main content

CoCr Is Not the Same: CoCr-Blanks for Dental Machining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Future Trends in Production Engineering

Abstract

Modern computer-aided technologies for manufacturing of individual prostheses are gaining popularity in the dental technology. The CAD/CAM technology promises a material-oriented processing of the manufactured material blanks. Especially with the cast processing of metals to master the process is essential. The control of the casting process directly affects the material quality and thus the clinical chances of success. Possible errors in the casting process, such as gas cavities, scabs, bubbles and cast stresses lead to a significant deterioration in the quality of the material. With the industrial production of material in blank form and their industrial machining this problem should be avoided. But it was the machining of difficult to machine materials such as cobalt-chromium alloys which presents new challenges.

Due to the increasing cost pressures in the manufacturing of dentures, the milling technology users are forced to reduce milling time and extend tool life. To achieve this, the Institute of Manufacturing Technology and Quality Management of the University of Magdeburg made investigations for a possible optimal machining process. As a first step, mainly in the German market used cobalt-chromium alloys have been analyzed by a crystal structure and EDX analysis as well by a macro-and micro-hardness measurements. Aim is to identify the impact of tools, width and depth of cut, cutting speeds and the used cobalt-chromium alloy on both the manufacturing and the material quality after processing. The investigation raises fundamental questions for process safety, the material removal rate and the tool wear. Machining tests were carried out to determine the impact of different material compositions and how these affect the milling process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Williams DF (eds) (1981) Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials. Vol.I, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. USA, pp 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haynes E (1913) Alloys of cobalt with Cr and other metals. Trans. Am Inst Metall. Pet Eng 44:573–580

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haynes E (1913) Alloys of Cobalt with other Metals. J Ind Eng Chem 5:189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Prange CH (1933) US-Patent 1909008

    Google Scholar 

  5. Prange CH (1938) US-Patent 2135600

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prange CH (1934) US-Patent 1958446

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith-Peterson MN (1939) Arthroplasty of the hip: a new method. J Bone Jt Surg 21:269–273

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis JR, ed. Metallic Materials, Chapter 3, in Handbook of Materials for Medical Devices, ASM International, Materials park, Ohio, USA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pilliar R.M.: Metallic Biomaterials, Chapter 2, in Biomedical Materials, USA, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  10. Park J., Lakes R.S.: Biomaterials: an introduction, Springer, New York, 2007, p.104–105

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ha S.-W., Wintermantel E., ed. Biokompatible Metalle, Chapter 11, in Medizintechnik Life Science Engineering, Springer, Berlin, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hanawa T., ed. Overview of metals and applications, in Metals for biomedical devices, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Oxford, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steinemann S.G., Corrosion of surgical implants – in vivo and in vitro tests, in Evaluation of biomaterials, Winter G.D., Leray J.L., de Groot K. (eds.), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1980, p. 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pilliar R.M., Manufacturing processes of metals: The porcessing and properties of metal implants, in Metal and ceramic biomaterials, 1, Ducheyne P., Hastings G.W. (eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1984, p. 79–105

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lindigkeit J.: Edelmetallfreie Legierungen, Dental-Kompakt 4, 2008, S. 40–42

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stümke M.: Einführung in die Metallkunde, in Zahnärztliche Werkstoffe und ihre Verarbeitung Band 1, Chapter 3, Eichner K., Kappert H. F.(eds.), Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Döring .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karpuschewski, B., Pieper, H.J., Krause, M., Döring, J. (2013). CoCr Is Not the Same: CoCr-Blanks for Dental Machining. In: Schuh, G., Neugebauer, R., Uhlmann, E. (eds) Future Trends in Production Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24491-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24491-9_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24490-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24491-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics