Skip to main content

Impact of the Initialization in Tree-Based Fast Similarity Search Techniques

  • Conference paper
Similarity-Based Pattern Recognition (SIMBAD 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7005))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many fast similarity search techniques relies on the use of pivots (specially selected points in the data set). Using these points, specific structures (indexes) are built speeding up the search when queering. Usually, pivot selection techniques are incremental, being the first one randomly chosen.

This article explores several techniques to choose the first pivot in a tree-based fast similarity search technique. We provide experimental results showing that an adequate choice of this pivot leads to significant reductions in distance computations and time complexity.

Moreover, most pivot tree-based indexes emphasizes in building balanced trees. We provide experimentally and theoretical support that very unbalanced trees can be a better choice than balanced ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bozkaya, T., Özsoyoglu, Z.M.: Indexing large metric spaces for similarity search queries. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 24(3), 361–404 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brin, S.: Near neighbor search in large metric spaces. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 574–584 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chávez, E., Navarro, G., Baeza-Yates, R., Marroquin, J.L.: Searching in metric spaces. ACM Computing Surveys 33(3), 273–321 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gómez-Ballester, E., Micó, L., Oncina, J.: Some approaches to improve tree-based nearest neighbour search algorithms. Pattern Recognition 39(2), 171–179 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Faloutsos, C., Lin, K.: Fastmap: a fast algorithm for indexing, data-mining and visualization of traditional and multimedia datasets. In: Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD 1995, pp. 163–174. ACM, New York (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman, H.: Boundary encoding and processing. Picture Processing and Psychopictorics, 241–266 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hjaltason, G.R., Samet, H.: Index-driven similarity search in metric spaces. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 28(4), 517–580 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalantari, I., McDonald, G.: A data structure and an algorithm for the nearest point problem. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 9, 631–634 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Doklady Akademii Nauk 163(4), 845–848 (1965)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Merkwirth, C., Parlitz, U., Lauterborn, W.: Fast nearest-neighbor searching for nonlinear signal processing. Physical Review 62, 2089–2097 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Micó, L., Oncina, J., Carrasco, R.C.: A fast branch and bound nearest neighbor classifier in metric spaces. Pattern Recognition Letters 17, 731–773 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Navarro, G., Reyes, N.: Dynamic spatial approximation trees. J. Exp. Algorithmics 12, 1–68 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Noltemeier, H., Verbarg, K., Zirkelbach, C.: Monotonous bisector* trees – a tool for efficient partitioning of complex scenes of geometric objects. In: Monien, B., Ottmann, T. (eds.) Data Structures and Efficient Algorithms. LNCS, vol. 594, pp. 186–203. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Shapiro, M.: The choice of reference points in best-match file searching. Commun. ACM 20, 339–343 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Uhlmann, J.K.: Satisfying general proximity/similarity queries with metric trees. Inf. Process. Lett. 40(4), 175–179 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, R.A., Fischer, M.J.: The string-to-string correction problem. Journal of the ACM 21(1), 168–173 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yianilos, P.N.: Data structures and algorithms for nearest neighbor search in general metric spaces. In: Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 311–321 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zezula, P., Amato, G., Dohnal, V., Batko, M.: Similarity Search: The Metric Space Approach. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Serrano, A., Micó, L., Oncina, J. (2011). Impact of the Initialization in Tree-Based Fast Similarity Search Techniques. In: Pelillo, M., Hancock, E.R. (eds) Similarity-Based Pattern Recognition. SIMBAD 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24471-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24471-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24470-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24471-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics