Skip to main content

Query Operators Shown Beneficial for Improving Search Results

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6966))

Abstract

Search engines allow users to retrieve documents with respect to a given query. These provide advanced search options, such as query operators (e.g., +term, term^10). Previous work studied how query operators are employed by end-users. In this paper, we study the extent to which using query operators may lead to improved results, regardless of specific users. We hypothesize that the proper use of query operators improves search results. To validate this hypothesis, we present a methodology relying on standard IR test collections. We applied this methodology to TREC-7 and TREC-8 test collections with five IR models implemented in the Terrier search engine. Experiments show that queries enriched with operators give an improvement in effectiveness up to 35.1% over regular queries. This result suggests that end-users would benefit from using operators more often.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aula, A., Khan, R.M., Guan, Z.: How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? In: CHI 2010: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 35–44. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buckley, C., Voorhees, E.M.: Retrieval System Evaluation. In: Voorhees and Harman [22], ch. 3, pp. 53–75

    Google Scholar 

  3. Croft, W.B., Metzler, D., Strohman, T.: Search Engines: Information Retrieval in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eastman, C.M., Jansen, B.J.: Coverage, relevance, and ranking: The impact of query operators on web search engine results. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 21(4), 383–411 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eastman, C.M., Jansen, B.J.: The appropriate (and inappropriate) use of query operators and their effect on web search results. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 41(1), 274–279 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gospodnetić, O., Hatcher, E.: Lucene in Action. Manning Publications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harman, D.K.: The TREC Test Collections. In: Voorhees and Harman [22], ch. 2, pp. 21–53

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hölscher, C., Strube, G.: Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. Comput. Netw. 33, 337–346 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen, B.J., Pooch, U.: A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(3), 235–246 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jansen, B.J., Spink, A., Saracevic, T.: Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Inf. Process. Manage. 36(2), 207–227 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucas, W., Topi, H.: Form and function: the impact of query term and operator usage on Web search results. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 53(2), 95–108 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogilvie, P., Callan, J.P.: Experiments Using the Lemur Toolkit. In: TREC 2001: Proceedings of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference. NIST, Gaithersburg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ounis, I., Amati, G., Plachouras, V., He, B., Macdonald, C., Lioma, C.: Terrier: A high performance and scalable information retrieval platform. In: OSIR 2006: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2006 Workshop on Open Source Information Retrieval (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Palacio, D., Cabanac, G., Sallaberry, C., Hubert, G.: Measuring Effectiveness of Geographic IR Systems in Digital Libraries: Evaluation Framework and Case Study. In: Lalmas, M., Jose, J., Rauber, A., Sebastiani, F., Frommholz, I. (eds.) ECDL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6273, pp. 340–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Purday, J.: Think culture: Europeana.eu from concept to construction. The Electronic Library 27(6), 919–937 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanderson, M.: Test collection based evaluation of information retrieval systems. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 4(4), 247–375 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Silverstein, C., Marais, H., Henzinger, M., Moricz, M.: Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum 33(1), 6–12 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, M.B.J., Saracevic, T.: Searching the web: the public and their queries. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(3), 226–234 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tukey, J.W.: Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Voorhees, E.M., Harman, D.K.: Overview of the Seventh Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-7). In: TREC-7: Proceedings of the 7th Text REtrieval Conference, pp. 1–23 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Voorhees, E.M., Harman, D.K.: Overview of the Seventh Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8). In: TREC-8: Proceedings of the 8th Text REtrieval Conference, pp. 1–23 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Voorhees, E.M., Harman, D.K.: TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. White, R.W., Morris, D.: Investigating the querying and browsing behavior of advanced search engine users. In: SIGIR 2007: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 255–262. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Williamson, D.F., Parker, R.A., Kendrick, J.S.: The box plot: A simple visual method to interpret data. Ann. Intern. Med. 110(11), 916–921 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hubert, G., Cabanac, G., Sallaberry, C., Palacio, D. (2011). Query Operators Shown Beneficial for Improving Search Results. In: Gradmann, S., Borri, F., Meghini, C., Schuldt, H. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6966. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24469-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24469-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24468-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24469-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics