Skip to main content

An Alternative Definition for Timed Automata Composition

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6996))

Abstract

Due to the complexity and time-based aspects of modern systems, compositional verification and abstraction-based verification techniques have been proposed to deal with these issues by considering the verification of system components separately (composition) and working on more abstract structures (refinement). In this paper, we propose a revised definition of the product of timed automata (TA) and give a compositional semantics based on individual timed transition system (TTS) semantics. Moreover, we establish a new compositional refinement property where the refinement of timed systems composition is given by the refinement of each component. For this purpose, starting from the basic timed transition systems, we introduce an original composition operator endowed with good properties (associativity, trace inclusion, etc) and supporting communications via shared variables and synchronization of actions. Thereafter, we instantiate this framework for timed automata where we show how to associate such a TTS with two-levels static priority (committedness) to a TA and establish the compositionality theorem introduced by [5] with the mentioned refinement property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, A.: Finite transition systems: semantics of communicating systems. Prentice Hall International Ltd., Hertfordshire (1994), Translator-Plaice, John

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Behrmann, G., David, A., Larsen, K.G.: A Tutorial on Uppaal. Department of computer science, Aalborg university (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bengtsson, J., Wang, Y.: Timed automata: Semantics, algorithms and tools. In: Desel, J., Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) Lectures on Concurrency and Petri Nets. LNCS, vol. 3098, pp. 87–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bensalem, S., Bozga, M., Sifakis, J., Nguyen, T.H.: Compositional verification for component-based systems and application. In: Cha, S(S.), Choi, J.-Y., Kim, M., Lee, I., Viswanathan, M. (eds.) ATVA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5311, pp. 64–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Berendsen, J., Vaandrager, F.: Compositional Abstraction in Real-Time Model Checking. In: 6th International Conference on Formal Modelling and Analysis of Timed Systems, Saint Malo, France, pp. 233–249 (September 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berthomieu, B., Bodeveix, J., Filali, M., Garavel, H., Lang, F., Peres, F., Saad, R., Stoecker, J., Vernadat, F., Gaufillet, P., Lang, F.: The syntax and semantics of FIACRE. LAAS Laboratory, University of Toulouse (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bornot, S., Gößler, G., Sifakis, J.: On the construction of live timed systems. In: Graf, S. (ed.) TACAS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1785, pp. 109–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bouyer, P., Markey, N., Reynier, P.A.: Robust model-checking of linear-time properties in timed automata. In: Correa, J.R., Hevia, A., Kiwi, M. (eds.) LATIN 2006. LNCS, vol. 3887, pp. 238–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke, E.M., Long, D.E., McMillan, K.L.: Compositional model checking. In: LICS 1989, pp. 353–362 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coq, Technical report, INRIA, http://coq.inria.fr

  11. David, A., Hakansson, J., Larsen, K.G., Pettersson, P.: Model checking Timed Automata with Priorities Using DBM Subtraction, pp. 128–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Henzinger, T.A., Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Timed transition systems (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen, H.E., Larsen, K.G., Skou, A.: Scaling up UPPAAL:automatic verification of real-time systems using compositionality and abstraction. In: Joseph, M. (ed.) FTRTFT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1926, p. 19. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Larsen, K.G., Pettersson, P., Wang, Y.: UPPAAL in a nutshell. Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfert (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall Ltd., Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bodeveix, JP., Boudjadar, A., Filali, M. (2011). An Alternative Definition for Timed Automata Composition. In: Bultan, T., Hsiung, PA. (eds) Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis. ATVA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6996. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24372-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24372-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24371-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24372-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics